Verstappen had a 3.5 second stop as well.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑22 Oct 2023, 22:39If Hamilton had a quick 2s stop he would have caught up to Verstappen.
He had 3.3s stop.
If Hamilton hadn't locked up costing him 3s on the first stint he'd have won. We can spend all day looking at the what ifs
I know.AR3-GP wrote: ↑22 Oct 2023, 22:40Verstappen had a 3.5 second stop as well.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑22 Oct 2023, 22:39If Hamilton had a quick 2s stop he would have caught up to Verstappen.
He had 3.3s stop.
And they still won't say out loud that he's the number one driver for some reason.
Hallucinating or something?
At least .5 secondsAMG.Tzan wrote: ↑22 Oct 2023, 22:44Hallucinating or something?
He may have lost 0,3 out of that! It was Lando that lost 1+ second by doing the same mistake!
GrizzleBoy wrote: ↑22 Oct 2023, 22:34He was under 2s behind Lando before the stops.
They gave him extra 7s to make up before he could even get to think fighting for the win.
Merc is definitely not a complete team in terms of drivers, pit wall, strategy, development or anything. They're kind of just blowing in the wind. Sometimes it's good, sometimes it's bad, but they don't seem to be in control.
At the same time Russell P7 so far behind...GrizzleBoy wrote: ↑22 Oct 2023, 22:43And they still won't say out loud that he's the number one driver for some reason.
ALSO, Liam Lawson would've finished much higher than P17.......such a shame he's not in a car.
I'll look at the laptimes later but I'm convinced it cost more than that and you could see it on the intervals
Charles and Lando are in on it. I wouldn't be surprised if the CIA had a drone ready to take him out if he got the lead. for LH.