Hmm.. I don't think that's right. Have you looked at the telemetry? Or followed how eagerly anticipated the Singapore and COTA upgrades were to the Alpha Tauri car - not dissimilar to McLaren's anticipation for Austria? The car made a big step forward in terms of pure performance with that upgrade that wasn't seen until COTATFSA wrote: ↑31 Oct 2023, 01:48Don't get your hopes up for AT. They still won't be able to copy the Red Bull aero design.CHT wrote:In fact, if RB19 technology made its way to AT for the 2024 season, we may see AT in the fight for the best of rest.
This weekend was just a one-off. I've of the things AT nailed this weekend was the cooling - they found an exact tradeoff between that and performance, which gave them an aero advantage.
If a team has found advantage from optimal cooling compared to other packages that would, I think you'll agree, manifest either in superior drag coefficient, or maybe they can extract more potential from the PU meaning time gains made under acceleration and down the straights
However if we look at Ricciardo in qualifying @ Mexico that isn't what we see at all.. We see a car that is as quick as the RB everywhere but the straights - better on the brakes but slightly slower in the high speed. Over 2 tenths are lost on the start-finish straight and he finishes less than 2 tenths behind Max.
I think while Mexico clearly suits the car, it's not just a good cooling configuration.. The car has legitimately a fair bit of downforce now - not on the level of Merc/McLaren/Ferrari/RB but on the level of Alpine
But the elephant is in the room - they've not stopped upgrading and have been chucking parts on all season. A basic car for the beginning of 2023 is one reason but another is that they've not focused on '24 as much as others. They could feel the pain next year