OnEcRiTiCaL wrote: ↑14 Jan 2024, 22:16
DoctorRadio wrote: ↑14 Jan 2024, 21:48
OnEcRiTiCaL wrote: ↑14 Jan 2024, 21:44
Nobody said Ferrari found 1 second. All sources says 0.6-0.7 sec. At Aston they talking 1sec+ and at Mercedes.
I wasn’t talking about Ferrari (BTW for them it’s reported 7 tenths and wouldn’t be bad at all), on Aston and Mercedes I didn’t read any number for them, would you provide the sources for them?
Thanks.
Of course they don't talking about numbers, but we know how much they was jump last year. So it was 1sec+ and 2023 early December Aston said they don't think os possible the same jump. At 2024 January Aston says the same jump is very possible. So if they just change mind and say so ,then they achieved it . Also coming out news about "Alonso cooking again",and Crack can't wait "nail biting " what other teams did at winter. Just have to read between the lines...
Reading between the lines is fine but please state that you're doing so when you're declaring these numbers all over the forum otherwise it can be misleading for people that may be less familiar
If you're assuming based on Fallows interview that AMR have replicated their 2022->2023 development then why stop at 1s? Their real improvement from '22 to '23 was over 2s/lap.. Right because that would be ridiculous and exposes how silly this exercise is
You say "all sources say 0.6-0.7 sec" and when asked for the source you deflect. Which sources say that?
All we had ahead of 2023 (other than Ashwin's inside info) was that "aston martin's numbers look good", mercedes had fired some employees relating to the wind tunnel operation, and that at least one team had realized halfway through the development that they were going in the wrong direction and started from scratch (which since became clear was McLaren) so that's the scale of info that leaks out at least publicly