RB20 speculation

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
BlueCheetah66
BlueCheetah66
33
Joined: 13 Jul 2021, 20:23

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

People should keep in mind that it looked as though they brought their updated sidepod inlet shape to their shakedown last year and only rolled it out later in the season. May end up the same way

Cs98
Cs98
33
Joined: 01 Jul 2022, 11:37

Re: RB20 speculation

Post


Conclusion: Scarbs is not Newey. OR, trickery?
Last edited by Cs98 on 13 Feb 2024, 23:36, edited 1 time in total.

delsando53
delsando53
3
Joined: 16 Feb 2023, 14:58

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

Image

User avatar
organic
1048
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

Cs98 wrote:
13 Feb 2024, 23:35

Conclusion: Scarbs is not Newey. OR, trickery?
Maybe it's not exactly what they'll run

Yes or there's something that's not visible from the pics so far that makes it viable

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
362
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

I don't understand what Scarbs thinks is negative about the design (other than negative connotations because of a differenct car)

BlueCheetah66
BlueCheetah66
33
Joined: 13 Jul 2021, 20:23

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
13 Feb 2024, 23:51
I don't understand what Scarbs thinks is negative about the design (other than negative connotations because of a differenct car)
I guess the whole development path with the downwashing sidepods has been in maximising the undercut and flow into that region. An 'overbite' inlet would seemingly backpedal on that development, and I would be surprised if that is what the design actually is. It seems that people have just seen Dr Obbs theorize that its this design and people have just accepted it

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
362
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

organic wrote:
13 Feb 2024, 11:31

Rear view suggestive of waterslides to me. Also can't see a floor edge wing.
https://i.imgur.com/vFZQorV.jpeg
Do you still think that is missing in the newer footage?

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
362
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

BlueCheetah66 wrote:
13 Feb 2024, 23:56
AR3-GP wrote:
13 Feb 2024, 23:51
I don't understand what Scarbs thinks is negative about the design (other than negative connotations because of a differenct car)
I guess the whole development path with the downwashing sidepods has been in maximising the undercut and flow into that region. An 'overbite' inlet would seemingly backpedal on that development, and I would be surprised if that is what the design actually is. It seems that people have just seen Dr Obbs theorize that its this design and people have just accepted it
I personally drew my own conclusion that it was overbite based on the photos.

This is very convincing:

Image

I'm also confused by why you think the overbite does not support downwash.
Last edited by AR3-GP on 14 Feb 2024, 00:00, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
yinlad
27
Joined: 08 Nov 2019, 20:10

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

This generation of car have always done this. Here's a picture from Silverstone 2022

Image
MVRC - Panthera

Venturiation
Venturiation
98
Joined: 04 Jan 2023, 19:48

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

f1rules wrote:
13 Feb 2024, 23:22
Lol rb just never dissapoints, they always deliver something interesting, that most of the time work
It's the W14 with RB livery and chassis

marcel171281
marcel171281
27
Joined: 22 Feb 2020, 12:08

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

If you look at the little video of the car being pushed backwards into the box, you can see the mechanic on the RHS sticking a cooler into the top of the sidepod near the mirror. You can see it sticking out while the car is pushed back as well. That wouldn't work when the inlet is on the underside.

Approx at 2 minutes:

f1rules
f1rules
594
Joined: 11 Jan 2004, 15:34
Location: Denmark

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

Dream on

Venturiation wrote:
14 Feb 2024, 00:02
f1rules wrote:
13 Feb 2024, 23:22
Lol rb just never dissapoints, they always deliver something interesting, that most of the time work
It's the W14 with RB livery and chassis

Venturiation
Venturiation
98
Joined: 04 Jan 2023, 19:48

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
13 Feb 2024, 23:51
I don't understand what Scarbs thinks is negative about the design (other than negative connotations because of a differenct car)
The negative is because everyone said aero on the W14 was the worst and didn't make sense, and now they are surprised RB are using the same

BlueCheetah66
BlueCheetah66
33
Joined: 13 Jul 2021, 20:23

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
13 Feb 2024, 23:57
BlueCheetah66 wrote:
13 Feb 2024, 23:56
AR3-GP wrote:
13 Feb 2024, 23:51
I don't understand what Scarbs thinks is negative about the design (other than negative connotations because of a differenct car)
I guess the whole development path with the downwashing sidepods has been in maximising the undercut and flow into that region. An 'overbite' inlet would seemingly backpedal on that development, and I would be surprised if that is what the design actually is. It seems that people have just seen Dr Obbs theorize that its this design and people have just accepted it
I personally drew my own conclusion that it was overbite based on the photos.

This is very convincing:

https://i.postimg.cc/k4gN7ps2/image.png

I'm also confused by why you think the overbite does not support downwash.
I'll admit I'm wrong. This is the first photo I've seen that shows a hint of an overbite inlet

f1rules
f1rules
594
Joined: 11 Jan 2004, 15:34
Location: Denmark

Re: RB20 speculation

Post

I still think it has underlip and intake at the top,

marcel171281 wrote:
14 Feb 2024, 00:04
If you look at the little video of the car being pushed backwards into the box, you can see the mechanic on the RHS sticking a cooler into the top of the sidepod near the mirror. You can see it sticking out while the car is pushed back as well. That wouldn't work when the inlet is on the underside.

Approx at 2 minutes: