Mercedes W15

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Venturiation
Venturiation
98
Joined: 04 Jan 2023, 19:48

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

Better front


AR3-GP
AR3-GP
364
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

The sidepod inlet almost looks like the W13 inlet turned on it's side:
Image

HungarianRacer
HungarianRacer
35
Joined: 25 Jun 2019, 12:26

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

Venturiation wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 00:00
Better front

Some water spray rolling off the 4th front wing flap around the pseudo-Y250 generating area:

Image

EDIT: GIF framerate increased.
Last edited by HungarianRacer on 15 Feb 2024, 01:08, edited 2 times in total.

mantikos
mantikos
35
Joined: 02 Mar 2011, 17:35

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

HungarianRacer wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 00:36
Venturiation wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 00:00
Better front

Some water spray rolling off the 4th front wing flap around the pseudo-Y250 generating area:

https://i.imgur.com/PXNzcBx.gif
I believe those are reflections of the markings from the track surface, probably too slow for something to be that apparent

User avatar
vorticism
323
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

I dub it the string wing.
𓄀

shady
shady
24
Joined: 07 Feb 2014, 06:31

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

Good luck, HidePods never really took off..

User avatar
DiogoBrand
73
Joined: 14 May 2015, 19:02
Location: Brazil

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 00:15
The sidepod inlet almost looks like the W13 inlet turned on it's side:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pP6T1comENg/maxresdefault.jpg
Perhaps they just have one stencil to draw the inlet so they had to improvise.

patrik
patrik
9
Joined: 28 Mar 2013, 00:59

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

HungarianRacer wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 00:36

Some water spray rolling off the 4th front wing flap around the pseudo-Y250 generating area:

https://i.imgur.com/tDjTpaX.gif

EDIT: GIF framerate increased.
Those are reflections from the track paint

auem123
auem123
1
Joined: 14 Feb 2024, 06:47

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

HungarianRacer wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 00:36
Venturiation wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 00:00
Better front

Some water spray rolling off the 4th front wing flap around the pseudo-Y250 generating area:

https://i.imgur.com/tDjTpaX.gif

EDIT: GIF framerate increased.
Hello, is it because of the angle of the shot( in the gif) or the second element of the front wing is quite narrow? It was not like that in the render....
Last edited by auem123 on 15 Feb 2024, 07:04, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
atanatizante
115
Joined: 10 Mar 2011, 15:33

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

Luscion wrote:
14 Feb 2024, 19:30

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGUIDZxW8AA ... name=small

Very bulggy driver upper cockpit area resemble Alpine from a couples of years ago... not so good for the CoG... did they placed stuff above the car just to have a big undercut?
"I don`t have all the answers. Try Google!"
Jesus

Matt2725
Matt2725
9
Joined: 02 Mar 2023, 13:12

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

atanatizante wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 09:35
Luscion wrote:
14 Feb 2024, 19:30

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGUIDZxW8AA ... name=small

Very bulggy driver upper cockpit area resemble Alpine from a couples of years ago... not so good for the CoG... did they placed stuff above the car just to have a big undercut?
I don't think it's really any bulkier than last year's car. Less so perhaps in some respects.

Also worth nothing the angle upon which this photo was taken, is from above likely on a gantry or bridge. That "bulk" is sloping down towards the rear of the ca rather than all being sat up high.

User avatar
chrisc90
41
Joined: 23 Feb 2022, 21:22

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

Kyle’s Analysis.


f1316
f1316
80
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

One thought occurred to me: with this front wing, you are sacrificing some actual surface area (and hence downforce) for this vortex generation. I know that conventional wisdom is that this is a fine trade off but I wonder if, with this generation of cars and the large diffuser/rearwards downforce centre, other teams haven’t followed this route purely for a question of balance?

Part of the reason this occurred to me is because it seems so simple that I’m surprised no one thought of it before (including Mercedes given, as shown here, they essentially exploited a similar trick in the past anyway).

Owen.C93
Owen.C93
177
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

f1316 wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 16:44
One thought occurred to me: with this front wing, you are sacrificing some actual surface area (and hence downforce) for this vortex generation. I know that conventional wisdom is that this is a fine trade off but I wonder if, with this generation of cars and the large diffuser/rearwards downforce centre, other teams haven’t followed this route purely for a question of balance?

Part of the reason this occurred to me is because it seems so simple that I’m surprised no one thought of it before (including Mercedes given, as shown here, they essentially exploited a similar trick in the past anyway).
They aren't really front end downforce limited in the current regs. There's plenty of scope to increase front wing angle of attack for more front load. The current wings are optimised for flow structure and efficiency.

So worst case they become a bit less efficient on the front end. But I don't think it's going to make an understeery car with no scope to resolve it.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

User avatar
scuderiabrandon
102
Joined: 11 Feb 2023, 08:42

Re: Mercedes W15

Post

HungarianRacer wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 00:36
Venturiation wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 00:00
Better front

Some water spray rolling off the 4th front wing flap around the pseudo-Y250 generating area:

https://i.imgur.com/tDjTpaX.gif

EDIT: GIF framerate increased.
that's reflections from the armco barrier.

The supposed vortex you are pointing out here way too far inset from the shedding edge on the front wing and I doubt you'd see it roll over at 30mph.