Indeed. Something stinks..poz wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 19:26https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGPNy-7X0AA ... =4096x4096
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGZIE6DXEAA ... me=900x900
it doesn't look the same inlet
Indeed. Something stinks..poz wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 19:26https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGPNy-7X0AA ... =4096x4096
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGZIE6DXEAA ... me=900x900
it doesn't look the same inlet
#2 would be epicly hilarious.Henk_v wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 19:19There are 2 options here;
-Team red Bull is rolling on the ground laughing because they purposely leaked pictures of a bullshit car the internet can dissect.
-Team red Bull is rolling on the ground laughing because they will kick MB ass in a '22 MB, while MB is driving a '24 RB..
Any way you slice it they are having fun
Pardon my ignorance, but it doesn't make sense to me, how this is going to route the boundary layer to go and hit the radiators inside the sidepod, without suffering serious losses. If it is going to be 'almost a slit' it has to be a horizontal letterbox under the overbite. Shifting the entry by 90 (especially with a massive thin-profile horizontal plane-wing forming the overbite) to deliver sufficient cooling AND a clean undercut flow, isn't too clever.
I have never seen a team block off a radiator inlet completely. Isn't it possible there is both an s-duct and a horizontal inlet?vorticism wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 19:31>It was cold during shake down
>They knew it was going to be cold during shake down
>They blocked off the inlets with sidepod fronts they'd never use later and ran the car using only centerline cooling
>It's a testing troll
Okay maybe not and I'll still wager they're letterbox, but the vertical inlet concept may have one advantage: easier adaptation of inlet size, track to track, similar to how their louvers last year were simple & serial and easy/cheap to alter per event.
Who said it’s zero pods??LM10 wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 18:53This is by no means Mercedes’ zeropod concept.AMG.Tzan wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 18:46WowAR3-GP wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 18:36https://preview.redd.it/9526zbzntric1.p ... 79c3b893fb
https://preview.redd.it/a4vcr1dqtric1.p ... a7b1929a09
Floor and sidepod area have been darkened...
Nose, sidepod inlets and engine cover bulges same as Mercedes last year!
Probably Newey is trying to ridicule Mercedes by dominating with their own concept…
Was just joking. Too off topic so I deleted it. Either Newey was throwing chaff or they had other more different concepts they were evaluating, although that seems a little unlikely to me considering the bodywork regs are so restrictive now. I'm not seeing the value of an S-duct. I have my doubts about how useful the concept is. You want outwash maxxing so why redirect air from that area.
With the little windtunnel time that they have, they would not have spent any of it building decoys.
Would be pretty cheap to slap on a vertical piece of carbon for those blurry studio shots if the actual inlet is letterbox shaped below that apparent wing on top of the sidepod. But who knows whats going on here.AR3-GP wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 19:52With the little windtunnel time that they have, they would not have spent any of it building decoys.
If any, the RB20 we're seeing on the low quality pictures looks more like the launch spec W14 with an upper lip and a vertical inlet - of course if it's true that the RB20 actually has vertical inlets.