Albon gave up the ghost a little when watching the Sainz C4 lap saying that it was interesting the the Red Bull and Ferrari don't seem to be affected by wind and can turn when they want.
EDIT: Sainz into the 29's...
2 years later, they seem to be back where they started in terms of understanding the car... Such a shame Vigna meddled with initial SF-23 concept.Xyz22 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2024, 15:43Leclerc confirmed our initial impression.
- Car is a massive step from the SF 23
- The base of the SF 24 is miles better because the car is behaving according to expectations
- They know which direction to follow while last year they had no --- clue
RB is probably ahead in terms of pure pace which was to be expected
Unfortunately we lost 1.5 years of development. This makes me so angry. Imagine if they changed the chassis and gearbox for 2023, they would have been able to focus only on aero performance this winter.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2024, 15:492 years later, they seem to be back where they started in terms of understanding the car... Such a shame Vigna meddled with initial SF-23 concept.Xyz22 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2024, 15:43Leclerc confirmed our initial impression.
- Car is a massive step from the SF 23
- The base of the SF 24 is miles better because the car is behaving according to expectations
- They know which direction to follow while last year they had no --- clue
RB is probably ahead in terms of pure pace which was to be expected
I have to correct myself, part of the blame for 23 struggles falls onto Binotto for cutting 22 development before TD-39 came. I can't remember them mentioning they specifically tested 10mm higher car on purpose in 22, just to see how the floor and diffuser would react. Massive opportunities thrown out the window. I don't think they'd need gearbox changes last year, just chassis.
They didn't set any expectations in terms of performance.