This was masked by Red Bull having a 20kg overweight car at the start of 2022 and a few technical gremlins!Cs98 wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:30Interesting theory but we can all recall how this era started, that is with Ferrari just as fast if not faster than RB. In other words, RB gained this advantage through superior development during the CC era. Others can gain it back the same way.dialtone wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:21It is OT here... So this is my last message on this:AMG.Tzan wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:10
Not really!
2014-2016 the championship goes down to the last race of the season 2 times and ends just 3 races from the end in 2015!
2017-2018 Ferrari shows up with a faster car yet Hamilton bleaches them!
2019-2020 were dominant seasons by Mercedes yet we got a ton of Mercedes vs Ferrari battles all through 2019 and some Red Bull battles at the end!
2020 ended up like that because of COVID but it was half a season with multiple new exciting circuits like Mugello and some new winners (Gasly, Perez)
2021 we got the greatest duel ever
So I wouldn’t say 2014-2021 were boring! 2011 and 2013 were far more boring…
2014-16 nobody but mercedes fans care that it came down to last race.
2017-18 nope, Ferrari was slower, the worse engine didn't allow to capitalize on a good car, and these were also the first years where the engine freeze was removed (so kinda proving my point). the way ham passed vettel in spa in 2017 still haunts me.
after 6 years on the formula we're finally getting some competition in 2019-20 and after removing engine freeze 3 years earlier and finally having Honda catch up and allowing at least RBR to properly race.
No one in good faith can argue that budget caps or freezes at the START of a formula help competition. Whoever nails the formula has won the era.
Every car had weight issues, RB didn't weigh 20kgs more than the Ferrari. The technical gremlins didn't stop us from seeing the fact that the Ferrari was faster in Bahrain and MUCH faster in Australia, the two races Max DNFd. Besides, shedding weight costs money under the cap too.AMG.Tzan wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:37This was masked by Red Bull having a 20kg overweight car at the start of 2022 and a few technical gremlins!Cs98 wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:30Interesting theory but we can all recall how this era started, that is with Ferrari just as fast if not faster than RB. In other words, RB gained this advantage through superior development during the CC era. Others can gain it back the same way.dialtone wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:21
It is OT here... So this is my last message on this:
2014-16 nobody but mercedes fans care that it came down to last race.
2017-18 nope, Ferrari was slower, the worse engine didn't allow to capitalize on a good car, and these were also the first years where the engine freeze was removed (so kinda proving my point). the way ham passed vettel in spa in 2017 still haunts me.
after 6 years on the formula we're finally getting some competition in 2019-20 and after removing engine freeze 3 years earlier and finally having Honda catch up and allowing at least RBR to properly race.
No one in good faith can argue that budget caps or freezes at the START of a formula help competition. Whoever nails the formula has won the era.
Had they started 2022 at the weight limit it would have been 2023 all over again…
Then TD39 came and the whole concept went bust and wasted a year on fixing it, definitely on Ferrari this last one but still... Reiterate it's OT here. We should reopen that other thread so we can chat about this there as it's more fun than the season we're about to see.Cs98 wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:46Every car had weight issues, RB didn't weigh 20kgs more than the Ferrari. The technical gremlins didn't stop us from seeing the fact that the Ferrari was faster in Bahrain and MUCH faster in Australia, the two races Max DNFd. Besides, shedding weight costs money under the cap too.
I have asked politely about the possibility, keeps the team/race threads more on topic....and of course saves moderation and deleted posts.dialtone wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:48Then TD39 came and the whole concept went bust and wasted a year on fixing it, definitely on Ferrari this last one but still... Reiterate it's OT here. We should reopen that other thread so we can chat about this there as it's more fun than the season we're about to see.Cs98 wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 19:46Every car had weight issues, RB didn't weigh 20kgs more than the Ferrari. The technical gremlins didn't stop us from seeing the fact that the Ferrari was faster in Bahrain and MUCH faster in Australia, the two races Max DNFd. Besides, shedding weight costs money under the cap too.
That’s valid but not representative imho. Max had time to charge the car and did his lap on the 2nd of brand new softs while everyone else was on hards except PER who had SAI within 2s and couldn’t really spend time charging.sport777 wrote:If we add up the best sectors of all the leading pilots in the race, we get a picture just for a general understanding, so:
Perez - 1:34.0;
Leclerc - 1:33.9;
Hamilton - 1:34.0;
Alonso - 1:34.0 (late pit stop);
Norris - 1:34.3;
Piastri - 1:34.4;
and the absurdity of Verstappen - 1:32.6!
Just to think about it, Perez lost by 1.4 seconds on the same soft tyres.
Still with 18 laps of fuel on board too! Practically a quali lap with 1/3 tank of fuel and doing a stint afterwards.sport777 wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 20:41If we add up the best sectors of all the leading pilots in the race, we get a picture just for a general understanding, so:
Perez - 1:34.0;
Leclerc - 1:33.9;
Hamilton - 1:34.0;
Alonso - 1:34.0 (late pit stop);
Norris - 1:34.3;
Piastri - 1:34.4;
and the absurdity of Verstappen - 1:32.6!
Just to think about it, Perez lost by 1.4 seconds on the same soft tyres.
Verstappen was only seen today at the start of the race for 1.5 laps and that’s it, he simply flew away, instead of Perez, let’s see Hamilton in RB or Alonso, Leclerc and it could have been much different, at the race pace Perez is a clear averagechrisc90 wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 20:49Still with 18 laps of fuel on board too! Practically a quali lap with 1/3 tank of fuel and doing a stint afterwards.sport777 wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 20:41If we add up the best sectors of all the leading pilots in the race, we get a picture just for a general understanding, so:
Perez - 1:34.0;
Leclerc - 1:33.9;
Hamilton - 1:34.0;
Alonso - 1:34.0 (late pit stop);
Norris - 1:34.3;
Piastri - 1:34.4;
and the absurdity of Verstappen - 1:32.6!
Just to think about it, Perez lost by 1.4 seconds on the same soft tyres.
I do suppose the tyre choices, and lack of a late SC today meant that there was no real other chance for anyone to try and beat it.