Perez had a 0.0 advantage so that does not make a car dominant. A car and driver are yes. Eeking the pole out and converting that to a dominant win.
Again with this no sense narrative. Perez is significantly slower than all the drivers who made the top 10 minus Piastri and Stroll.
With managing, in free air Max was 0.6 to 0.8s faster than Sainz. Even correcting 0.1-0.2s for Leclerc this RB20 seems very dominant in the race. No weaknesses anymore.AR3-GP wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 22:33Considering that the typical big upgrade package of a team can be worth 3 tenths, then 3 tenths is not enough for a team to be out of reach over a season. Especially not when you consider both an upgrade package and track to track favoritism.
That is why I put the dominant gap at 5 tenths or more. You are dominant when you are still leading after another team brings a big upgrade package and you didn't change your car. It's incredibly rare to see a 5 tenths upgrade package which is why it's a good number.
He should have thought of winning, why didn’t he? Is he stupid?
Leclerc has historically been between 0.25s and 0.35s quicker than Sainz in Bahrain. We don't know with this car yet, of course.Cassius wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 22:55With managing, in free air Max was 0.6 to 0.8s faster than Sainz. Even correcting 0.1-0.2s for Leclerc this RB20 seems very dominant in the race. No weaknesses anymore.AR3-GP wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 22:33Considering that the typical big upgrade package of a team can be worth 3 tenths, then 3 tenths is not enough for a team to be out of reach over a season. Especially not when you consider both an upgrade package and track to track favoritism.
That is why I put the dominant gap at 5 tenths or more. You are dominant when you are still leading after another team brings a big upgrade package and you didn't change your car. It's incredibly rare to see a 5 tenths upgrade package which is why it's a good number.
You really shouldn’t be talking about narrative when all your posts are. And if they make any sense, well, what is the sense of trying to deny Max’ talent. It’s an ABC to me xyz.
Verstappen is the best driver in Formula 1. No one is denying any of his incredible talent. In fact, i didn't say that Hamilton or whoever would outperform him with the RB20.Sieper wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 23:04You really shouldn’t be talking about narrative when all your posts are. And if they make any sense, well, what is the sense of trying to deny Max’ talent. It’s an ABC to me xyz.
I’m glad we’re joking, for a moment I thought you were serious.
RedBull at the same time has the best designer and car in history, but also a driver that overcomes the car being otherworldly to win races while carrying the car on his back.Xyz22 wrote:Verstappen is the best driver in Formula 1. No one is denying any of his incredible talent. In fact, i didn't say that Hamilton or whoever would outperform him with the RB20.
On the other hand, you are implying that Perez is either as fast or faster than the top 10 drivers minus Stroll and Piastri. Okay then.
Most importantly they have a thinking driver.dialtone wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 23:10RedBull at the same time has the best designer and car in history, but also a driver that overcomes the car being otherworldly to win races while carrying the car on his back.Xyz22 wrote:Verstappen is the best driver in Formula 1. No one is denying any of his incredible talent. In fact, i didn't say that Hamilton or whoever would outperform him with the RB20.
On the other hand, you are implying that Perez is either as fast or faster than the top 10 drivers minus Stroll and Piastri. Okay then.