f1jcw wrote: ↑05 Mar 2024, 01:47
dans79 wrote: ↑05 Mar 2024, 00:45
If true, I could see this being what started the war.
https://www.formulapassion.it/motorspor ... o-red-bull
According to what was gathered by FormulaPassion.it , an authoritative source familiar with the matter has reconstructed the genesis of the disagreements so bitter that they split the team, with Horner on one side and the Austrians on the other.
In fact, it seems that in 2023 Christian Horner would have presented himself to the Yoovidhya family with an offer from financiers in the British area, with the aim of acquiring - in whole or in part - the Formula 1 team from the company. Thus covering that leading role - 'Wolff-style' - which he has been whispered about in many quarters in recent months.
All this was unaware of the Austrians, who would not have welcomed - to put it mildly - this move by the team principal. From here the clear rift between Horner and Fuschl's headquarters
was born , even before the scandal that emerged in recent weeks.
Naturally the conditional is a must in such a complex and multifaceted matter, but we can confirm that it is a strong indiscretion , which would help to rebuild the relationships that have been so tense in the team for over a year.
I heard this several weeks ago from a British twitter user who lives or used to live in Austria and gets the reports from Austria
Certainly seems its been simmering a while.
And while I tend to think no matter what it should have ended in Horners removed if true, I wonder if the leaks have tried to create a very very one sided picture of what happened - perhaps why Horner doesn't deny them
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/26328654 ... gues-sext/
It was also reported that the woman at the centre of the sexts storm has struck up a close friendship with another senior figure in Horner’s Red Bull team.
This may well be selective to try and discredit the woman involved think there is PR 101 about that kinda think for RB.
But, still working in the role where she still has to deal in some part with Horner even in a reduced capacity is she 'okay' with how things are at RBR, an office fling gone wrong is CH/RBR address the issues re the harassment she is happy to move on - obviously very very hypothetical on my part there.
Also Horner is threatening to sue F1 magazine on their story
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/formula-1/2 ... cusations/
Christian Horner threatens F1 magazine with legal action over ‘inaccurate’ fresh accusations
Red Bull claimed the article caused ‘serious harm’ to its team principal with their lawyers demanding its removal
Robert Mendick ; Tom Morgan and Tom Cary 4 March 2024 • 6:44pm
Related Topics
Christian Horner, Red Bull Racing, Formula 1 Grand Prix
Red Bull Racing team principal Christian Horner arrives at the grid before the start of the Bahrain Formula One Grand Prix at the Bahrain International Circuit in Sakhir on March 2, 2024
Christian Horner was cleared of 'controlling behaviour' against a female employee last week Credit: Getty Images/Andrej Isakovic
Christian Horner is threatening legal action against a Formula One magazine that named the female employee with whom he allegedly shared lewd messages.
The magazine’s website crashed on Monday under the weight of internet traffic following publication of a lengthy article on the case. It prompted Horner’s lawyers at Harbottle & Lewis to fire off two legal letters accusing the magazine of publishing an “unlawful” article that was defamatory but also preached privacy and data protection rights.
Horner’s lawyers demanded the article’s removal, which it said had caused serious harm to Horner, the chief executive of Red Bull Racing.
Horner, 50, was cleared of ‘controlling behaviour’ last Wednesday following an investigation by an independent barrister on behalf of Red Bull’s parent company. But a day later flirty and occasionally lewd WhatsApp messages purportedly between Horner and a female employee at Red Bull were sent via an anonymous email account to journalists as well as team principals and senior officials in F1.
The magazine, which is available only online, identified the woman at the centre of the controversy as well as making a number of claims relating to events at Red Bull.
Horner, who is married to Geri Horner (nee Halliwell), 51, a former member of the Spice Girls, denies any wrongdoing and was photographed with her at the Bahrain Grand Prix on Saturday in a public show of support from his famous wife.
Team chief Christian Horner (R) of Red Bull Racing and his wife Geri Halliwell arrive before the Formula One Bahrain Grand Prix, at Bahrain International Circuit in Sakhir, Bahrain,
Geri (left) and Christian Horner were in attendance together at last weekend's Bahrain Grand Prix Credit: Shutterstock/Ali Haider
The magazine article began to circulate on Sunday in preview form. The article was then published online at midnight but by lunchtime on Monday it had become inaccessible because of the volume of traffic until the afternoon. It charges a subscription of £205 a year.
The magazine, which is published monthly, is normally viewed by just 50 people a day who pay a subscription for it, its editor said.
The legal letters were sent by Harbottle & Lewis to Tom Rubython, the magazine’s 68-year-old editor and author of the article. On his Wikipedia page, it says of Mr Rubython: “he has enjoyed a controversial journalistic career and has reputedly been sued for libel more times than any other British journalist.”
A Red Bull spokesman said: “The piece is littered with inaccuracies and is subject to legal complaint.”
Mr Rubython confirmed he had received legal warnings from lawyers representing Horner. However, he insisted Horner and Red Bull would have to seek a court injunction before he would agree to take the article down.
“We’ve actually said to them, we’re not taking the article down from our website... if they want that to happen, they have got to seek an injunction,” he said.
When asked about the extent of contact he had with Red Bull and Horner in advance of publication, Rubython said: “We talked to Red Bull, we didn’t talk to Christian. We didn’t talk to Christian because we knew we would immediately get ....the worst thing anybody can have is pre-publication is an injunction. We knew what would happen immediately. I spoke to him yesterday and immediately I got the ‘You must speak to my lawyer’.”
The editor added that the website had crashed on Monday due to intense interest worldwide in his story. “The website is overwhelmed with thousands of people trying to access the report.... it is designed for 50 or so users a day.”