data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afb03/afb03370336282f5311efdd637a3a0f268eaa00b" alt="Applause =D>"
jofs89 wrote: ↑06 Mar 2024, 00:24I think this is a bit catastrophising after one race after one race. Alonso was 3.5 tenths off pole, that is not even taking into account possible track evolution of up to 1 tenth (as we're in hypothetical land) then apparently he made a mistake on the last corner which which cost him 1.5 tenths... So damn, the Aston was only 1 tenth slower than the Red Bull!!xReVo wrote: ↑05 Mar 2024, 21:18For your information, the gap in the flying lap between Aston, Ferrari and Redbull was almost 4 tenths (taking Leclerc's time in Q2 as a reference), which is a lot. And this happened in Bahrain which is not a motor track, in other tracks such as Baku, Monza but also Arabia itself, potentially in the flying lap he will take 1 second of gap. (without thinking about the race pace which will be even worse). Do you understand my concerns now? This is why I keep saying that the first race was fundamental, but it's gone now. And don't expect McLaren-style improvements, because I remember they had them after the proprietary wind tunnel.OnEcRiTiCaL wrote: ↑05 Mar 2024, 17:57
If Aston wouldn't be fast at 1lap I would worry also, because last year after Canada this happened. But this year actually Aston was fast on 1lap and in all sector! Anyway if you check the Q3 times from 23vs24 ,then they made a huge step at winter,just of course others made also. I think in the car have potential to fight against Ferrari,Mercedes and McLaren. I would wait at least more 2 race.
Thought I would restore some balance in hypothetical land.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afb03/afb03370336282f5311efdd637a3a0f268eaa00b" alt="Applause =D>"