2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
LurkingMostly
LurkingMostly
9
Joined: 22 Feb 2024, 15:53

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Italian journalist Franco Nugnes seems convinced that the car's main weakness is the lack of downforce, but I don't get that impression reading this forum. I know the guy has his connections in the F1 world, so does he have a point? Or is he talking nonsense after all?

SoulPancake13
SoulPancake13
1
Joined: 24 Feb 2023, 18:49

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

LurkingMostly wrote:
11 Mar 2024, 23:22
Italian journalist Franco Nugnes seems convinced that the car's main weakness is the lack of downforce, but I don't get that impression reading this forum. I know the guy has his connections in the F1 world, so does he have a point? Or is he talking nonsense after all?
Could be in relation to Red Bull, which is likely true but still, we are pretty good in the high speed corners, typically not a sign of lack of downforce.

f1316
f1316
82
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

LurkingMostly wrote:
11 Mar 2024, 23:22
Italian journalist Franco Nugnes seems convinced that the car's main weakness is the lack of downforce, but I don't get that impression reading this forum. I know the guy has his connections in the F1 world, so does he have a point? Or is he talking nonsense after all?
I guess it may depend on your point of view ie Fred said something different, that they were not great in a straight line and from that you would infer a lack of efficiency (not outright downforce) to be the problem. But then, they had more outright downforce in Jeddah because they were running a larger, draggier rear wing. So that is partially to compensate for downforce not being produced by the floor.

All that said, I don’t think it’s as simple as either of those explanations. There seems to be a lot of downforce on both circuits in certain types of high speed corners. And when running the same type of wing as RB, I believe I’m correct in saying top speed numbers are not an issue. It seems to be more a question of traction and how they reach the top speed, so I think it’s a more complicated combination of overall car balance.

KimiRai
KimiRai
257
Joined: 10 Aug 2022, 20:08

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

LurkingMostly wrote:
11 Mar 2024, 23:22
Italian journalist Franco Nugnes
No! I too once trusted him.... one day you'll understand :D

Now seriously, well, sometimes he gets it right. Sometimes. But Ive yet to see an apology for the many times he has gotten it wrong. Most recent case, he said Mercedes and Aston would retain pullrod rear suspension. I had to learn the hard way :lol: , but you that are still innocent I advise reading his words with massive caution.

User avatar
Vanja #66
1572
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

AmateurDriver wrote:
11 Mar 2024, 22:46
So, in your opinion (and loosely speaking, in a few words), what has worked as the main enabler of big performance gain for McL and Aston? I seem to understand something different from the Ferrari concepts. Maybe an imitation of Red Bull sculpted floor top that gives one always the best compromise though never the peak available downforce?
Both McLaren and AMR had a lot of room to improve and this was mostly related to their floor performance. Both had to adapt their sides as well, to improve undercut outwash generation which they did. Ferrari was leading the grid in terms of floor performance in pre-TD39 period of 2022 and then lost out by going into unknown with launch SF23. They had their big step last year and they kept improving as much as RB over the winter. They are 2nd force and there are no big steps when you are that high up, there are CFD/WT restrictions, as well as budget cap that lumits development.

LurkingMostly wrote:
11 Mar 2024, 23:22
Italian journalist Franco Nugnes seems convinced that the car's main weakness is the lack of downforce, but I don't get that impression reading this forum. I know the guy has his connections in the F1 world, so does he have a point? Or is he talking nonsense after all?
In the most basic terms, lack of (floor) downforce is the issue for Ferrari right now. Car handles well, there is no more inherit understeer and rear-end instability. In Jeddah they tried something different, but in all likelyhood they would still have lost to Max even if they prioritised low drag instead of higher downforce because they would have lost cornering advantage. If they try lower ride height to gain more floor downforce, car would most likely lose stability or they would have already done that. My impression after two races - they are happy with base setup and can adjust to each track around it, they don't want to ruin that by going too low and messing up other things, so they want to focus on adding floor performance through aero development. That would be almost the exact opposite of early 2023.
AeroGimli.x

And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

DoctorRadio
DoctorRadio
5
Joined: 11 Apr 2021, 16:43

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
12 Mar 2024, 07:45
LurkingMostly wrote:
11 Mar 2024, 23:22
Italian journalist Franco Nugnes seems convinced that the car's main weakness is the lack of downforce, but I don't get that impression reading this forum. I know the guy has his connections in the F1 world, so does he have a point? Or is he talking nonsense after all?
In the most basic terms, lack of (floor) downforce is the issue for Ferrari right now. Car handles well, there is no more inherit understeer and rear-end instability. In Jeddah they tried something different, but in all likelyhood they would still have lost to Max even if they prioritised low drag instead of higher downforce because they would have lost cornering advantage. If they try lower ride height to gain more floor downforce, car would most likely lose stability or they would have already done that. My impression after two races - they are happy with base setup and can adjust to each track around it, they don't want to ruin that by going too low and messing up other things, so they want to focus on adding floor performance through aero development. That would be almost the exact opposite of early 2023.
Nugnes writes the lack of downforce as the reason for which Ferrari didn’t generate tyre temperature at the beginning of the stints, but that can’t be true; when up to tyre temperature, Ferrari was on average a few hundredths faster in S1 than Red Bull and kept the tyres in so good shape that they did the fastest lap at the end (whereas Red Bull was losing tyre temp at the end and had worse deg than Ferrari on the hards).

https://formu1a.uno/gp-arabia-saudita-a ... o-lontane/

This can’t be possible with enough downforce; I’m not saying you are wrong, but Nugnes certainly is in regard to tyre temp issue as due to lack of downforce!

Federico Albano wrote his usual analysis, he thinks it’s nothing to do with downforce and more with mechanical settings of the rear suspension that was innovated this year, where Ferrari has a learning curve to do to exploit it better.









I think you are right that Ferrari has to add performance, but going through data Ferrari had the downforce available as seen when the tyres had generated the correct temperature (fastest race pace on average in S1 and best deg on hards); you are perfectly right that they have to improve aero efficiency through the floor as that would enable to use less rear wing and improve top speed accordingly.
At the same time, Ferrari had double better deg than Red Bull, so they had margin to use less rear wing with hindsight and have better aero efficiency than shown; maybe there is less difference in efficiency than we think when the car is set up properly and aggressively, race pace from lap 28 would show exactly that, 2-3 tenths to Ver in that phase was a very honest gap, that coupled with the higher downforce wing, there is easily one less tenth when you factor a lower downforce rear wing and adjust the set up to put more temperature in the tyres (the aero-mechanical set up they went for improved massively deg compared to Red Bull (even too much, as they arrived at the end of the race with the tyres in too perfect shape) and hindered them in quali and beginning of the stints).
I guess they are fine in being conservative at this stage of the season as Red Bull isn’t attackable anyway and they are in no man’s land.

User avatar
Vanja #66
1572
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

DoctorRadio wrote:
12 Mar 2024, 08:32
Nugnes writes the lack of downforce as the reason for which Ferrari didn’t generate tyre temperature at the beginning of the stints, but that can’t be true; when up to tyre temperature, Ferrari was on average a few hundredths faster in S1 than Red Bull and kept the tyres in so good shape that they did the fastest lap at the end (whereas Red Bull was losing tyre temp at the end and had worse deg than Ferrari on the hards).
That's a different matter and I agree with you, what Nugnes wrote was incorrect. If anything, we can make a case they may have had too much for this track and asphalt, they may not have had any issues with sliding in these fast corners, which would have heated up the tyres more quickly. This is a very nice article and I will bring up a few quotes:

https://www-formulapassion-it.translate ... r_pto=wapp

In the specific case of Saudi Arabia, Charles Leclerc complained of greater driving difficulties once with new tires fitted, a dynamic which however cannot be attributed to a temperature setting problem.
***
The race confirmed the difficulties on new tyres, with a more grumpy car at the start of the stint: “ We struggled all the time at the start of the stints , whether it was on the medium or hard ones. We struggled to turn them on. Then towards the end of the stints we went quite well." The dynamics also explains the reason for the times recorded in the first sector. Despite the greater level of aerodynamic downforce, on new tires Leclerc accumulated a delay in the initial qualifying snake from the Red Bull duo, only to then manage to equalize their times in the race once the tires had stabilised.

Pirelli's explanation

An interesting interpretation of the incident is that offered by Simone Berra, Chief Engineer of Pirelli, who commented on the episode to Formula Passion in the usual pre-race meeting : " In our opinion it doesn't depend on the temperature setting ", explains Berra. “Jeddah is a very different circuit from Bahrain also from the asphalt point of view. With this track design and this asphalt, we noticed that exploiting the potential of the softer compound is very difficult. You have to hit the right window of use. We don't tie it so much to heating, but rather to having both axes perfectly balanced in terms of temperatures. It's really a question of extracting the peak of grip. The soft rubber has a high peak grip, but limited to a very narrow range.”

“In Q3 Leclerc made an attempt preceded by two preparation laps, but then he wasn't particularly fast. This is a further indication that it was not a heating problem. The tire was ready, it was up to temperature , but having this very narrow grip range, Leclerc was unable to stabilize its performance. In the next attempt he only did one preparation lap and, although the temperatures were not in the optimal window for use, he actually managed to go faster. This is a clear indication that it wasn't a problem with the temperature setting, but with the grip itself of the tire."

Used tires, on the other hand, offered a lower peak grip than new ones, but dispersed over a wider range of use and therefore more easily exploitable. Adds Berra: “During qualifying we saw that using used tire is easier because it is already stabilised. It seems that after having undergone a thermal cycle, the tire gives more confidence because it is able to work on a wider range of temperatures".

The peculiarity of Jeddah

The Pirelli engineer goes into detail about why in Saudi Arabia it was particularly complex to exploit the peak grip of the tyre: “It is a very complicated practice and also linked to the characteristics of the asphalt. The one in Bahrain was very wrinkled and tended to emphasize the hysteresis and mechanical grip characteristics. In Jeddah, however, the characteristics of adhesive grip are emphasised , being a smoother road surface, which reaches a very high level".

Bahrain's was one of the most abrasive asphalts in the world championship, emphasizing the mechanical adhesion of the tyre, the grip associated with the mechanical interlocking of the rubber between the roughness of the road surface. The Saudi circuit, on the other hand, has a particularly smooth road surface, which highlights the adhesive grip, associated with the chemical adhesion of the rubber to the asphalt. “The difference here is how to extract the most from a soft tyre, which already has a lot of adhesive grip , on an asphalt that gives the same,” comments Berra.

“Using the optimal peak grip as soon as the tire is new can make the difference. We have seen many riders who have improved with used tyre: when the tire stabilizes, you are able to exploit it in a wider temperature range and you have more performance. Here the stability of the car and the confidence in the vehicle are really important , not seeing the exit in many corners."
So what Pirelli's expert Simone Berra is saying - Ferrari wasn't stable and balanced enough in terms of using peak adhesive grip on Softs in Qualifying. They believed heating up the tyres would bring more performance so first time they spent two laps heating them up and as a result they reduced adhesive grip (by stripping the top layers of the tyre). Due to low mechanical grip and higher adhesive grip ratio on this track, Leclerc managed to have his best time even when tyres were not fully up to temperature by exploiting adhesive grip fully with the fresh tyre. This is a new level of insight we are getting! :D

Berra suggested having both axles fully temperature-balanced on the first lap would offer the absolute peak mechanical and adhesive grip and it seems he suggest Leclerc didn't quite achieve that in his best Q3 lap. I think this may have happened in the race as well, but probably with even more pronounced trouble of heating up Hard tyres. This happened last year as well and Ferrari now actually have "gentle" suspension compared to Red Bull, in both races they had lower degradation than RB.

Definitely they have some more room to dial out these smaller setup issues and get closer to Max, but overall more downforce is needed to fight Red Bull for wins.
AeroGimli.x

And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
Vanja #66
1572
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

High praise for Bearman from Jock Clear, now the head of FDA.

https://www.racefans.net/2024/03/12/bea ... demy-head/

The thing I’m most proud of from him is that it’s very easy – especially when Charles is a bit ahead of you and you know this car will go quicker, there’s a bit more potential – just to overstretch yourself and make a mistake. And those last 10 laps with Lando and Lewis bearing down on you with a new set of soft tyres, you think ‘this is where he’s just going to lock up into turn one, it’s all going to get messy’

But he didn’t. He just kept the rhythm, he kept going and actually got quicker and quicker towards the end of the race. And I think his best lap was on the penultimate lap.
AeroGimli.x

And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

Xyz22
Xyz22
123
Joined: 16 Feb 2022, 20:05

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
12 Mar 2024, 10:53
High praise for Bearman from Jock Clear, now the head of FDA.

https://www.racefans.net/2024/03/12/bea ... demy-head/

The thing I’m most proud of from him is that it’s very easy – especially when Charles is a bit ahead of you and you know this car will go quicker, there’s a bit more potential – just to overstretch yourself and make a mistake. And those last 10 laps with Lando and Lewis bearing down on you with a new set of soft tyres, you think ‘this is where he’s just going to lock up into turn one, it’s all going to get messy’

But he didn’t. He just kept the rhythm, he kept going and actually got quicker and quicker towards the end of the race. And I think his best lap was on the penultimate lap.
Deserved praise.
He did a very good job.

https://formu1a-uno.translate.goog/ferr ... r_pto=wapp

According to Formu1a.uno something minor will arrive for Suzuka, but the first big upgrade package (sidepods, bodywork and floor) will arrive in time for Imola

CaribouBread
CaribouBread
101
Joined: 29 Mar 2022, 08:37

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Yelistener does it again with a very interesting video on driver's neck strength in fast corners!

Bearman's head wobbled like a pendulum in Jeddah high-speed corners

Xyz22
Xyz22
123
Joined: 16 Feb 2022, 20:05

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

So Ferrari will follow RB 2023 development path according to Formu1a.uno at least regarding the side pods.

Watto
Watto
4
Joined: 10 Mar 2022, 15:12

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

CaribouBread wrote:
12 Mar 2024, 11:51
Yelistener does it again with a very interesting video on driver's neck strength in fast corners!

Bearman's head wobbled like a pendulum in Jeddah high-speed corners
The footage shows it nice and clear. Helps show I think why his drive was impressive

User avatar
chrisc90
41
Joined: 23 Feb 2022, 21:22

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Mess with the Bull - you get the horns.

User avatar
bluechris
9
Joined: 26 Jun 2019, 20:28
Location: Athens

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

chrisc90 wrote:
12 Mar 2024, 14:18
Lol Marko... it never gets old :)

CaribouBread
CaribouBread
101
Joined: 29 Mar 2022, 08:37

Re: 2024 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

chrisc90 wrote:
12 Mar 2024, 14:18
...
I have faith in Vasseur to ensure a young driver's future. He's got enough experience in that front.