http://www.silverarrows.net/news/merced ... 15-issues/
they know they're missing something, they just don't know what...
Won a race in 2022 and got 2nd in constructors in 23. He doom talk is overblownVaexa wrote: ↑14 Mar 2024, 20:15Like they did in 2022 and 2023?TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑14 Mar 2024, 19:38Mercedes will figure it out at some point in the next few races and they will be right there with Ferrari. Just as McLaren did.
While they finished 2023 second in the constructors, by the time we got to the second half of the 2023 season Mercedes were fourth best and a good distance adrift of both 2nd & 3rd best Ferrari and McLaren.TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 01:37Won a race in 2022 and got 2nd in constructors in 23. He doom talk is overblownVaexa wrote: ↑14 Mar 2024, 20:15Like they did in 2022 and 2023?TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑14 Mar 2024, 19:38Mercedes will figure it out at some point in the next few races and they will be right there with Ferrari. Just as McLaren did.
Did you see where both George Russell and Max Verstappen said that the cars are too low and their spines are being destroyed by bumps? These ground effect cars derive performance from being as low to the ground and as stiffly sprung as possible. Did you also see where the drivers are all saying dirty air is worse?venkyhere wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 06:42Someone help me understand what James Allison is saying https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-w ... /10587033/
I can only see "we can't get this right, how RedBull, Ferrari and McLaren have managed, so please make changes to chassis rules for 2026, so that we can be back in the game" said in a more tech-winded, beating-around-the-bush, manner.
Even taken at face value and good faith, I wonder if he's reconsidering his team's insistence on TD039 that basically made the problem of "ground hugging aero" worse.venkyhere wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 06:42Someone help me understand what James Allison is saying https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-w ... /10587033/
I can only see "we can't get this right, how RedBull, Ferrari and McLaren have managed, so please make changes to chassis rules for 2026, so that we can be back in the game" said in a more tech-winded, beating-around-the-bush, manner.
The solution is quite simple - raise the rear and use softer springs...zibby43 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 07:45Did you see where both George Russell and Max Verstappen said that the cars are too low and their spines are being destroyed by bumps? These ground effect cars derive performance from being as low to the ground and as stiffly sprung as possible. Did you also see where the drivers are all saying dirty air is worse?
Which teams will never implement without FIA intervention.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 12:36The solution is quite simple - raise the rear and use softer springs...zibby43 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 07:45Did you see where both George Russell and Max Verstappen said that the cars are too low and their spines are being destroyed by bumps? These ground effect cars derive performance from being as low to the ground and as stiffly sprung as possible. Did you also see where the drivers are all saying dirty air is worse?
Did you see 2022 season ? How close the fight was for P1 for the first half of the season ? And how cars were able to follow very close ? Just because one team did a good job 'developing' the car from a 'first time right' concept , and others are lagging behind, doesn't make the regulation a failure. The fact that the wake is again dirty now, is because teams have found clever ways to exploit loopholes in the rules and make their cars faster, fallout being following closely is not as easy as 2022.zibby43 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 07:45Did you see where both George Russell and Max Verstappen said that the cars are too low and their spines are being destroyed by bumps? These ground effect cars derive performance from being as low to the ground and as stiffly sprung as possible. Did you also see where the drivers are all saying dirty air is worse?venkyhere wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 06:42Someone help me understand what James Allison is saying https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-w ... /10587033/
I can only see "we can't get this right, how RedBull, Ferrari and McLaren have managed, so please make changes to chassis rules for 2026, so that we can be back in the game" said in a more tech-winded, beating-around-the-bush, manner.
Allison is basically saying you can achieve closer racing by other means, not just ground effect regs that aren't proving to be the greatest thing since sliced bread (for a variety of reasons).
Ferrari and McLaren have got it so right that they'll each finish 250+ points (minimum) behind RB in the WDC and WCC.
venkyhere wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 16:30Did you see 2022 season ? How close the fight was for P1 for the first half of the season ? And how cars were able to follow very close ? Just because one team did a good job 'developing' the car from a 'first time right' concept , and others are lagging behind, doesn't make the regulation a failure. The fact that the wake is again dirty now, is because teams have found clever ways to exploit loopholes in the rules and make their cars faster, fallout being driving in the wake of the car ahead is not as easy as 2022.zibby43 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 07:45Did you see where both George Russell and Max Verstappen said that the cars are too low and their spines are being destroyed by bumps? These ground effect cars derive performance from being as low to the ground and as stiffly sprung as possible. Did you also see where the drivers are all saying dirty air is worse?venkyhere wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 06:42Someone help me understand what James Allison is saying https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-w ... /10587033/
I can only see "we can't get this right, how RedBull, Ferrari and McLaren have managed, so please make changes to chassis rules for 2026, so that we can be back in the game" said in a more tech-winded, beating-around-the-bush, manner.
Allison is basically saying you can achieve closer racing by other means, not just ground effect regs that aren't proving to be the greatest thing since sliced bread (for a variety of reasons).
Ferrari and McLaren have got it so right that they'll each finish 250+ points (minimum) behind RB in the WDC and WCC.
Allisons rant is classic sour grapes.
Maybe Allison has an ulterior motive with his comments but I can’t disagree. These current cars concepts are not what f1 should be about. I even heard Perez complain about bouncing last weekend. So including the best car they all have ride/bouncing issues. Whenever you ride onboard with any driver you can hear the car hitting the ground and the sound it makes is reminiscent of a --- box road car that rattles a lot. This is supposed to be the pinnacle of motor sports ffs.venkyhere wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 16:30Did you see 2022 season ? How close the fight was for P1 for the first half of the season ? And how cars were able to follow very close ? Just because one team did a good job 'developing' the car from a 'first time right' concept , and others are lagging behind, doesn't make the regulation a failure. The fact that the wake is again dirty now, is because teams have found clever ways to exploit loopholes in the rules and make their cars faster, fallout being following closely is not as easy as 2022.zibby43 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 07:45Did you see where both George Russell and Max Verstappen said that the cars are too low and their spines are being destroyed by bumps? These ground effect cars derive performance from being as low to the ground and as stiffly sprung as possible. Did you also see where the drivers are all saying dirty air is worse?venkyhere wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 06:42Someone help me understand what James Allison is saying https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-w ... /10587033/
I can only see "we can't get this right, how RedBull, Ferrari and McLaren have managed, so please make changes to chassis rules for 2026, so that we can be back in the game" said in a more tech-winded, beating-around-the-bush, manner.
Allison is basically saying you can achieve closer racing by other means, not just ground effect regs that aren't proving to be the greatest thing since sliced bread (for a variety of reasons).
Ferrari and McLaren have got it so right that they'll each finish 250+ points (minimum) behind RB in the WDC and WCC.
Allisons rant is classic sour grapes.