Forecast is very unpredictable at the moment, Confidence Grade C but as of this very moment the radar would suggest heavy rain on Wednesday (today) and low chance of rain throughout the weekend. Quite the opposite of what it was 3 days ago.
You would basically make a zero-pod intake with mid-wing whcih McLaren has already done.AR3-GP wrote: ↑02 Apr 2024, 20:14I butchered one of Vorticism's drawings to show how a double sidepod could pass the 2 section test:
https://i.postimg.cc/cCLNfjfM/image.png
https://i.postimg.cc/MK4m2Q3z/image.png
However, I don't know if the radiator inlet is permitted to be so far backwards so I still don't think such an idea could be legal.
Lefty8 wrote: ↑02 Apr 2024, 21:22what would this achieve other than create a lot of drag?De Wet wrote: ↑01 Apr 2024, 13:36vorticism:
RB20 development speculation: Suzuka spec sidepods.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GKBl-axWcAI ... me=900x900
In that respect, the RB19 and RB20 are similar, albeit on the face of it the cars are different. So why did Red Bull choose such a considerable difference in concept in 2024, when they were so successful in 2023?
"Our aerodynamics team has done a fantastic job," praised Wache. "They have developed the new package in such a way that ultimately there is more freedom to further develop the car within the current concept.
"Therefore, we don't see the current concept as the ultimate version, but we have created further development possibilities. In addition, it is nice to see that everything works well with this concept and that the correlation between the simulations and the track also match exactly."
https://racingnews365.com/red-bull-high ... -admissionHe added: "In fact, when we make changes to make the tyres work better, you know that you also have to give up something in the car. It always comes at the expense of something when you try to save the tyres.
"You can see that in qualifying, for example, where we are not the best team. Sometimes we pay the price for that by not understanding something, I'm sure, because then we have to choose to set up more for race pace, but by doing so we sacrifice qualifying a bit.
"So if we understood that aspect of the car better, we could be good in both qualifying and the race. However, we still lack some information to make that happen."
Let's hope that some users here will come round again.Wouter wrote: ↑02 Apr 2024, 21:27https://formu1a.uno/en/red-bull-to-intr ... panese-gp/
.Red Bull will not change to the ‘zeropod’ concept, despite what was previously suggested.
...
We're used to Max Verstappen and GP communicating over the F1 Team Radio. Now the reigning World Champion is joined
by his Race Engineer for a lap of the Suzuka Circuit on @EASPORTSF1 ahead of this weekend's Japanese GP.
The pair study the circuit with the help of the @Oracle dashboard.
Motorsport ItalyMax Verstappen: "The brake problem wasn't a real failure, but we clearly had to work on it to make sure it can't happen again. We decided to change some procedures to make sure it doesn't happen again."
Like every single team on the grid?chrisc90 wrote:Thats why this team is the sharpest on the grid.
There was a issue, it was investigated, and not a countermeasure has been put in place to ensure it doesnt happen again.
Wouldnt go that far. Some clearly dont learn from mistakes.
Like who? Bottas pit stops aside.chrisc90 wrote:Wouldnt go that far. Some clearly dont learn from mistakes.