It's looking good but we only had 1 run on soft tyres. We are still far from the real potential of these cars with track evolution, setup work, etc.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2024, 13:39One of the few 100% valid laps from 2024 FP1 was Leclerc's lap on Softs. Unfortunately, we can't compare Sainz' 23 and 24 FP1 laps because of these telemetry issues, but both of them were flat 2s quicker than same time last year.
https://i.ibb.co/cFg6Wsf/jpn-lec-23-24.png
Massive time was gained in T2 (exit of Turn 1), Esses and Dunlop curve with the speed carried over, T14 (Spoon exit) and Casio chicane. T2, Dunlop and T14 is where Ferrari gained more than RB did from last year, since RB was 1.6s quicker than last year FP1. Overall, seems like the track was at least 1s quicker in FP1, likely more. Everyone was flying basically, Russell was 2.8s quicker than last year.
Also Ferrari ran higher PU mode last year, being considerably faster even with bigger wing on every straight. Judging by Marko's repeated comments, seems RB can't accept Ferrari finally catching up on low drag car design
Obscene performance difference in the spoon.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2024, 13:39One of the few 100% valid laps from 2024 FP1 was Leclerc's lap on Softs. Unfortunately, we can't compare Sainz' 23 and 24 FP1 laps because of these telemetry issues, but both of them were flat 2s quicker than same time last year.
https://i.ibb.co/cFg6Wsf/jpn-lec-23-24.png
Massive time was gained in T2 (exit of Turn 1), Esses and Dunlop curve with the speed carried over, T14 (Spoon exit) and Casio chicane. T2, Dunlop and T14 is where Ferrari gained more than RB did from last year, since RB was 1.6s quicker than last year FP1. Overall, seems like the track was at least 1s quicker in FP1, likely more. Everyone was flying basically, Russell was 2.8s quicker than last year.
Also Ferrari ran higher PU mode last year, being considerably faster even with bigger wing on every straight. Judging by Marko's repeated comments, seems RB can't accept Ferrari finally catching up on low drag car design
And also not losing any speed in the slow corners, which was one of the strengths of last year's car.CouncilorIrissa wrote: ↑05 Apr 2024, 14:50Obscene performance difference in the spoon.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2024, 13:39One of the few 100% valid laps from 2024 FP1 was Leclerc's lap on Softs. Unfortunately, we can't compare Sainz' 23 and 24 FP1 laps because of these telemetry issues, but both of them were flat 2s quicker than same time last year.
https://i.ibb.co/cFg6Wsf/jpn-lec-23-24.png
Massive time was gained in T2 (exit of Turn 1), Esses and Dunlop curve with the speed carried over, T14 (Spoon exit) and Casio chicane. T2, Dunlop and T14 is where Ferrari gained more than RB did from last year, since RB was 1.6s quicker than last year FP1. Overall, seems like the track was at least 1s quicker in FP1, likely more. Everyone was flying basically, Russell was 2.8s quicker than last year.
Also Ferrari ran higher PU mode last year, being considerably faster even with bigger wing on every straight. Judging by Marko's repeated comments, seems RB can't accept Ferrari finally catching up on low drag car design
Generally speaking, whenever Marko is worried about Ferrari's pace, he means it. Mini race sim looks very strong. Of course who knows the fuel loads, but very promising indeed.Vinlarr89 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2024, 16:11Looking at the very small long run sim done by leclerc and comparing to 2023 race, is it not 1s better off than the best lap of the entire race?! Obviously we don’t know how long that performance could have been sustained with the tyre deg etc, but it’s promising as!
Sainz pitted for 2:30 only after his short run, Leclerc for 3:20. Usually the pit stop time in practice to fully fuel the car is close to 5 minutesSoulPancake13 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2024, 18:18Generally speaking, whenever Marko is worried about Ferrari's pace, he means it. Mini race sim looks very strong. Of course who knows the fuel loads, but very promising indeed.Vinlarr89 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2024, 16:11Looking at the very small long run sim done by leclerc and comparing to 2023 race, is it not 1s better off than the best lap of the entire race?! Obviously we don’t know how long that performance could have been sustained with the tyre deg etc, but it’s promising as!
That would assume that the cars were "empty" when they were sent for the short runs, which is unlikely. So it sounds like they had quite a bit of fuel on board, probably more than others for short runs in that case, which could mean that they didn't need to spend as much time fueling for the long runs. Marko said Ferrari was a second a lap faster on the long runs so RB have some catching up to do but I doubt they will bridge a 1 second margin. Perhaps only rain would thwart Ferrari this weekend.search wrote: ↑05 Apr 2024, 20:28Sainz pitted for 2:30 only after his short run, Leclerc for 3:20. Usually the pit stop time in practice to fully fuel the car is close to 5 minutesSoulPancake13 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2024, 18:18Generally speaking, whenever Marko is worried about Ferrari's pace, he means it. Mini race sim looks very strong. Of course who knows the fuel loads, but very promising indeed.Vinlarr89 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2024, 16:11Looking at the very small long run sim done by leclerc and comparing to 2023 race, is it not 1s better off than the best lap of the entire race?! Obviously we don’t know how long that performance could have been sustained with the tyre deg etc, but it’s promising as!
It's currently 1-1 in qualifying. This is statistically insignificant.
I don't understand this current massive overreaction.