Is he right? Is it too much drag with the Aston?
The Merc powered teams seem close together with Mclaren being a little better and Mercedes themselves being the slightly worst.
Is he right? Is it too much drag with the Aston?
are piastri, russell and lewis (all in faster cars than aston) all joke as well?Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 09:07I guess people that understand Sainz is a proper teammate benchmark whereas Stroll is a joke?avantman wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 09:07Alonso DOTD, one of the easiest weekends to choose. Outperformed three significantly faster cars driven by very strong drivers and destroyed his teammate in the same car totally. Incredibly performance again, congrats! The level of understanding of modern fans voting for Leclerc, who got comfortably beaten by his teammate and finished P4 in clearly and easily 2nd fastest car, is just pathetic. Who are all these people?
Charles drove an excellent race to make up lots of positions from starting in P8 due to quali team mishaps and bring the car home in literally the best position that was available to him.avantman wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 09:07Alonso DOTD, this was of the easiest weekends to chose one. Outperformed three significantly faster cars driven by very strong drivers and destroyed his teammate in the same car totally. Incredibly performance again, congrats! The level of understanding of modern fans voting for Leclerc, who got comfortably beaten by his teammate and finished P4 in clearly and easily 2nd fastest car, is just pathetic. Who are all these people?
Excuses. Russell pitted first both times, which meant he got an undercut to open the gap but Hamilton had the fresher tyres to close the gap in the stints. Still, his pace wasn't good enough to catch George. He completely stalled in the middle stint between 3-4s and was not going to get even close to George in the final stint if not for the Alonso train. George was just faster straight up. But fair on Lewis for letting him go, he didn't need to do that.GrizzleBoy wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 09:07He gained about 10s total on pace to George after the first stops, before George joined that fight with Piastri and Alonso.
Having g to be the second car to stop each stint is what hurt him.
If he hadn't been slower in the first stint and let George by, he'd have had the better pit strategy and would've been 10s ahead of where George finished in this race, based on his relative pace to George through each stint.
But....shoulda woulda coulda etc...
I was wondering during the race with now all the teams basically converging on the same aero design whether we need to start asking questions of the Mercedes engine power output/efficiency etc.
The difference between Merc and Aston was marginal at best post upgrades, only skewed by the lack of performance from Stroll. That being said Alonso drove a great race and certainly beat the faster Piastri. But Leclerc gaining 4 positions and jumping Norris was perhaps even better.avantman wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 09:09are piastri, russell and lewis (all in faster cars than aston) all joke as well?Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 09:07I guess people that understand Sainz is a proper teammate benchmark whereas Stroll is a joke?avantman wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 09:07Alonso DOTD, one of the easiest weekends to choose. Outperformed three significantly faster cars driven by very strong drivers and destroyed his teammate in the same car totally. Incredibly performance again, congrats! The level of understanding of modern fans voting for Leclerc, who got comfortably beaten by his teammate and finished P4 in clearly and easily 2nd fastest car, is just pathetic. Who are all these people?
Albon has always had poor judgement to go on the outside in places where it's dangerous. Some times he made it and on others, he has eaten humble pie.Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 07:32Ricciardo was keeping the position whether he moved over or not, that's not a place you pass on the outside from half a car length back. Albon's decision making is not good here, from the standpoint of taking a big risk without any real reward. That doesn't mean he is technically at fault for the crash, it just means it was a bad decision to put himself in a risky position.Spacepace wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 07:26If Ricciardo did this on purpose you'd be looking at this differently but he didn't so he gets a pass. He was desperate to not lose another place to Stroll and he f'd upCs98 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 07:16
That's not a clear pass opportunity, that's a crash trap. He's always going to get squeezed there when he isn't fully alongside. He's putting himself in bad positions and the team can't afford it. How much money has this guy thrown down the drain in a team that needs every penny?
Russell caught up because He didnt have to slow down through the Sargent crash because the sector was green flagged. while Piastri and Alonso did.
The difference is there and it is clear, both in quali (even based on fastest sector times, aston was 5th fastest car) and even more so on race pace. Fernando Alonso makes the difference look slimmer than it is. You might be too young, but I saw Alonso finishing P2 in Suzuka 2011, in front of Vettel, Webber, and 23 seconds in front of Hamilton *- all in faster cars than Ferrari.Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 09:16The difference between Merc and Aston was marginal at best post upgrades, only skewed by the lack of performance from Stroll. That being said Alonso drove a great race and certainly beat the faster Piastri. But Leclerc gaining 4 positions and jumping Norris was perhaps even better.
It's not clear at all after these upgrades, quali was super close between several teams and Alonso was managing his pace in that final stint, just keeping Piastri within DRS. Being a superfan and remembering good performances from 10+ years isn't evidence of anything. I can equally bring up 2007 and use that to make my case, but that's equally disingenuous.avantman wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 09:31The difference is there and it is clear, both in quali (even based on fastest sector times, aston was 6th fastest car) and even more so on race pace. Fernando Alonso makes the difference look slimmer than it is. You might be too young, but I saw Alonso finishing P2 in Suzuka 2011, in front of Vettel, Webber, and 23 seconds in front of Hamilton - all in faster cars than Ferrari.Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 09:16The difference between Merc and Aston was marginal at best post upgrades, only skewed by the lack of performance from Stroll. That being said Alonso drove a great race and certainly beat the faster Piastri. But Leclerc gaining 4 positions and jumping Norris was perhaps even better.
He keeps doing what he does all his career- beats faster cars driven by great drivers. He is that good. and yeah, even in his 40s he is both faster and better overall than Sainz.
*Of course all of them are slow, and Ferrari was just as fast as Red bull and Mclaren at the end of 2012. No need to mention this. You are surely free to believe what you want to believe...