Ferrari for pole but second and third is my prediction on Sunday
Ferrari for pole but second and third is my prediction on Sunday
It's 19 wins in 7 seasons, 2017-2023. Far from an awful tally, certainly not deserving of your ridiculous "worst ever" designation. The previous 7 seasons, 2010-2016, Ferrari only scored 14 wins.Xyz22 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 16:50Seems the Teams are quite surprised by the paint applied to the track.
I wonder if that will have a significant impact on performance compared to the simulations run before the WE.
We are talking about Ferrari, therefore the expectations are much higher. Moreover, for the 2022 season Ferrari also had a massive advantage in terms of budget and wind tunnel hours compared to RB.This has nothing to do with Merc so moving it.
I spot 4 race winning cars in there, 5 pole sitting cars, a couple of contendors, and that's before we get to the fact you omitted the SF70H which Binotto oversaw as TD. I don't know what the obsession is with denigrating ex-employees unfairly, just creates a toxic environment.
The reality is that under Binotto Ferrari cars finished P1 14 times in 6 season. To me, that is an absolutely awful result.
What is this nonsense? Budget advantage?Moreover, for the 2022 season Ferrari also had a massive advantage in terms of budget and wind tunnel hours compared to RB.
You dont get a number of pole positions and three race wins with a 'pretty bad' chassis. Come on now. smhCouncilorIrissa wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 17:08SF90 wasn't a bad car when taking the engine into account, but the chassis was pretty bad. Slow-speed corner deficit was simply obscene.
I always have flashbacks to this comparison when people talk about the SF90. Look at the third sector
With the power advantage Ferrari enjoyed in 2019, any remotely competent chassis should've at least been in the championship fight. Given that power advantage was achieved through dodgy means, it paints a pretty grim picture.
This is just such a wild, reaching claim. lolvenkyhere wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 18:29The layout of this chineseGP looks very technical and full of slow corner high traction exits. A track where driver skill can dominate and skill differences between team mates can get amplified. If LeClerc loses to Sainz in this track, without any weather/reliability/crash events being responsible for it ; mentally he will take a severe beating and get disillusioned beyond recovery for the rest of this 2024 season.
Some people think the championships for the next 2 years have been decided already based on the first race weekend of 2023.
What? Ferrari didn't bring any upgrades to the SF 21 outside a modified floor spec after a few races. Red Bull developed the RB16b quite a bit through the year, which had clearly an impact on their overall budget and wind tunnel hours for the 2022 project.Cs98 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 17:55It's 19 wins in 7 seasons, 2017-2023. Far from an awful tally, certainly not deserving of your ridiculous "worst ever" designation. The previous 7 seasons, 2010-2016, Ferrari only scored 14 wins.Xyz22 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 16:50Seems the Teams are quite surprised by the paint applied to the track.
I wonder if that will have a significant impact on performance compared to the simulations run before the WE.
We are talking about Ferrari, therefore the expectations are much higher. Moreover, for the 2022 season Ferrari also had a massive advantage in terms of budget and wind tunnel hours compared to RB.This has nothing to do with Merc so moving it.
I spot 4 race winning cars in there, 5 pole sitting cars, a couple of contendors, and that's before we get to the fact you omitted the SF70H which Binotto oversaw as TD. I don't know what the obsession is with denigrating ex-employees unfairly, just creates a toxic environment.
The reality is that under Binotto Ferrari cars finished P1 14 times in 6 season. To me, that is an absolutely awful result.
What is this nonsense? Budget advantage?Moreover, for the 2022 season Ferrari also had a massive advantage in terms of budget and wind tunnel hours compared to RB.
Well, Merc switched pretty early and Ferrari was much better than them, so are they even worse than the "worst ever"? Odd that.Xyz22 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 18:54What? Ferrari didn't bring any upgrades to the SF 21 outside a modified floor spec after a few races. Red Bull developed the RB16b quite a bit through the year, which had clearly an impact on their overall budget and wind tunnel hours for the 2022 project.Cs98 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 17:55It's 19 wins in 7 seasons, 2017-2023. Far from an awful tally, certainly not deserving of your ridiculous "worst ever" designation. The previous 7 seasons, 2010-2016, Ferrari only scored 14 wins.Xyz22 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 16:50Seems the Teams are quite surprised by the paint applied to the track.
I wonder if that will have a significant impact on performance compared to the simulations run before the WE.
We are talking about Ferrari, therefore the expectations are much higher. Moreover, for the 2022 season Ferrari also had a massive advantage in terms of budget and wind tunnel hours compared to RB.
The reality is that under Binotto Ferrari cars finished P1 14 times in 6 season. To me, that is an absolutely awful result.
What is this nonsense? Budget advantage?Moreover, for the 2022 season Ferrari also had a massive advantage in terms of budget and wind tunnel hours compared to RB.
RedBull breached the budget cap. What budget advantage for Ferrari are you talking about?
It's psychology. A prediction I am making. The nature of the track places a lot of onus on the driver, compared to a lot of other tracks. And all the teams and drivers know it. Let's revisit (I hope leClerc outguns his team mate this weekend) this point at the end of this season.Seanspeed wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 18:38This is just such a wild, reaching claim. lolvenkyhere wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 18:29The layout of this chineseGP looks very technical and full of slow corner high traction exits. A track where driver skill can dominate and skill differences between team mates can get amplified. If LeClerc loses to Sainz in this track, without any weather/reliability/crash events being responsible for it ; mentally he will take a severe beating and get disillusioned beyond recovery for the rest of this 2024 season.I still believe LeClerc is one level above Sainz in terms of car control.
It's such a long season. Nothing is getting completely decided by the mere 5th race weekend.
Does George Russel in 2023 Bahrain count as 'some people' ?
Sunday may be a different story, but I think Ferrari should take the pole tomorrow and win the sprint race.
If Ferrari takes pole they’ll be favorites for the race win as well. This year the things are the other way around: Ferrari’s race pace is superior to their qualifying pace (as things stand).search wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 19:42Sunday may be a different story, but I think Ferrari should take the pole tomorrow and win the sprint race.
There hasn't been a single weekend this year where Red Bull looked good from day one, and I see no reason why this should change now, on a "new" track with limited practice time.
the qualifying sessions are the other way around as well this year, though .LM10 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 20:10If Ferrari takes pole they’ll be favorites for the race win as well. This year the things are the other way around: Ferrari’s race pace is superior to their qualifying pace (as things stand).search wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 19:42Sunday may be a different story, but I think Ferrari should take the pole tomorrow and win the sprint race.
There hasn't been a single weekend this year where Red Bull looked good from day one, and I see no reason why this should change now, on a "new" track with limited practice time.
Sprint win is not really a true win, just ask McLaren With different parc ferme for Q and R, Red Bull will be fully on top of their setup. They won't make another mistake like Australia, they just don't do thatsearch wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 19:42Sunday may be a different story, but I think Ferrari should take the pole tomorrow and win the sprint race.
There hasn't been a single weekend this year where Red Bull looked good from day one, and I see no reason why this should change now, on a "new" track with limited practice time.
You can if it's achieved through illegal means. And if it was a legitimate grey area, then it's on Binotto again for not getting his way the FIA.Seanspeed wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 18:34You dont get a number of pole positions and three race wins with a 'pretty bad' chassis. Come on now. smhCouncilorIrissa wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 17:08SF90 wasn't a bad car when taking the engine into account, but the chassis was pretty bad. Slow-speed corner deficit was simply obscene.
I always have flashbacks to this comparison when people talk about the SF90. Look at the third sector
With the power advantage Ferrari enjoyed in 2019, any remotely competent chassis should've at least been in the championship fight. Given that power advantage was achieved through dodgy means, it paints a pretty grim picture.
Y'all are acting like Ferrari had like 100hp over the rest of the field or some nonsense. Chassis had weaknesses, but it wasn't awful. Also, you cant just ignore the engine, which also falls under the TD's responsibilities.