The same guy that says the car has pace for podiums Clown63
The same guy that says the car has pace for podiums Clown63
venkyhere wrote: ↑21 Apr 2024, 05:57motorsport.com :So who is LYING ?"The drivers chose to go in pretty different directions to support our learning process, but it clearly didn’t work for us today on a single lap" Toto Wolff
“We made massive changes going into qualifying,” he said. “We just wanted to experiment. So George [Russell] decided to go one way, much different to what we had because we worked pretty much with the same before."
Russell's assessment was slightly different, stating that there was "a small difference, but directionally very similar between the two of us", although conceded that the team had overall made wide-reaching changes from the sprint in a bid to evoke an improvement in lower-speed performance. Either way, those changes did not appear to work out; Russell could only manage eighth in qualifying - over a tenth behind the Ferraris as the rear end of the Mercedes did not appear to connect particularly well with the front.
Let's settle the driver debate: team principal Toto Wolff stated that "the drivers chose to go in pretty different directions to support our learning process, but it clearly didn’t work for us today on a single lap."
The Reichmarshall (who wants to protect the First Lieutenant)
OR
The Second Lieutenant (who wants to expose the First Lieutenant's shortcomings)
The medium stint was wild...literally couldnt catch up to the Alpine.Luscion wrote: ↑21 Apr 2024, 10:56Looking at the lap times Lewis was losing around 2-4 tenths in the slow corners and then gaining it all back in the others, pretty much got stuck behind Ocon before he pitted and Piastri, dipping in and out of drs range before the detection point despite him having damage because of it, Russell didn't seem to have the same issues.
Agree. There’s setup differences and Lewis ballsed it up. His mistake. Having said that, Russell is basically playing safe, going with the trusted baseline, and seems happy achieving P6 to P8 most weekends, and beating Lewis reinforces that approach.
Well he said he's never doing that again but he also said the same thing in Japan, next GP is also a sprint weekend so let's seeDGP123 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2024, 11:08Agree. There’s setup differences and Lewis ballsed it up. His mistake. Having said that, Russell is basically playing safe, going with the trusted baseline, and seems happy achieving P6 to P8 most weekends, and beating Lewis reinforces that approach.
He will do the same again. Its pathetic from someone of calibre like him. Always on the radio complaining about the car while Russell just gets on with it. It no wonder Wolf can't be asked with him and as a fan, his professionalism and mentality is poor.Luscion wrote: ↑21 Apr 2024, 11:10Well he said he's never doing that again but he also said the same thing in Japan, next GP is also a sprint weekend so let's see
I trust Toto anyday over George Russell.venkyhere wrote: ↑21 Apr 2024, 05:57motorsport.com :So who is LYING ?"The drivers chose to go in pretty different directions to support our learning process, but it clearly didn’t work for us today on a single lap" Toto Wolff
“We made massive changes going into qualifying,” he said. “We just wanted to experiment. So George [Russell] decided to go one way, much different to what we had because we worked pretty much with the same before."
Russell's assessment was slightly different, stating that there was "a small difference, but directionally very similar between the two of us", although conceded that the team had overall made wide-reaching changes from the sprint in a bid to evoke an improvement in lower-speed performance. Either way, those changes did not appear to work out; Russell could only manage eighth in qualifying - over a tenth behind the Ferraris as the rear end of the Mercedes did not appear to connect particularly well with the front.
Let's settle the driver debate: team principal Toto Wolff stated that "the drivers chose to go in pretty different directions to support our learning process, but it clearly didn’t work for us today on a single lap."
The Reichmarshall (who wants to protect the First Lieutenant)
OR
The Second Lieutenant (who wants to expose the First Lieutenant's shortcomings)
"Never doing that again" doesnt mean you wont make changes. He likely means not taking the route they took.Luscion wrote: ↑21 Apr 2024, 11:10Well he said he's never doing that again but he also said the same thing in Japan, next GP is also a sprint weekend so let's see
Exactly!!DGP123 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2024, 11:08Agree. There’s setup differences and Lewis ballsed it up. His mistake. Having said that, Russell is basically playing safe, going with the trusted baseline, and seems happy achieving P6 to P8 most weekends, and beating Lewis reinforces that approach.
Come on, Binotto said there was nothing stopping Ferrari from winning all the remaining races in the season So Toto isn't alonekc_f1 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2024, 11:40Weekend after weekend...just embarrassing.
Other drivers/teams including Ferrari, Mclaren and Redbull have been in 4th/5th fastest in the past..but never heard any of them crib publicly about setup directions or any other reason.
On top of that there's Toto who doesn't feel ashamed when he claims that "the car had the pace to fight for podiums".
Classic overpromise and underdeliver situation.
That's an odd sentiment! Mercedes GP is a solid mid-pack team and they have a solid-pack car. That seems entirely on course for their development.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑21 Apr 2024, 11:30This year is a write off and means nothing unless they can get the car into a state where it can finish 2nd in the championship.
PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑21 Apr 2024, 11:25If there is any time when the car can legitimately outpace Ferrari and McLaren we know who is to be thanked for that (by carrying out the experiments and developing the car in the vein of the great Schumacher).