Seems like the result is more important than the action.
I know "turn one" and that Lewis wasn't punished in the sprint, but Checo's "torpedo", as Sainz called it, should have some consequence. There is nuance, tightly packed cars, everyone trying to make the corner and carrying a little bit too much speed I can see some wiggle. But Checo blitzing down the inside, nearly collecting three/four cars, going way off track, then rejoining into faster cars, should probable get something. Worse again, Checo is the main benefactor to Sainz's penalty.

 I'm happy to continue with this topic if you do, start a dedicated topic since here it's off topic. As for veto, it was informal and was granted on the basis of Ferrari using V12 in 80s when FIA wanted to mandated V10 that British teams were using (Ford Cosworth, I think). It only became a formal veto right in 2005 - when rules were already changed to prevent Ferrari running races as 3-4 stints of qualifying laps.
 I'm happy to continue with this topic if you do, start a dedicated topic since here it's off topic. As for veto, it was informal and was granted on the basis of Ferrari using V12 in 80s when FIA wanted to mandated V10 that British teams were using (Ford Cosworth, I think). It only became a formal veto right in 2005 - when rules were already changed to prevent Ferrari running races as 3-4 stints of qualifying laps.

