Lewis' pitstop
Surely it must be.Bill_Kar wrote: ↑21 May 2024, 11:19I also remember Sainz doing a 30.something spent in the pit lane and LH doing a 33.something . I thought it was a timing error.
Some needed clarifications about this matter:mkay wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 16:44On hards, he was absolutely faster. Got the gap down from over 9 seconds to about 3.5 seconds in about 15 laps.
Had HAM not lost 5 seconds going off track, he would have absolutely been in RUS' gearbox. Whether he would have passed him on track, who knows.
RUS did not have good pace on those hards which is why his engineer offered a late pit stop at the cost of track position.
This isn't 'well known', just frequently speculated.atanatizante wrote: ↑21 May 2024, 14:20Some needed clarifications about this matter:
Since the hybrid era, it is well-known that HAM prioritizes race setup rather than the qualy one with RUS doing just the opposite since the ground effect car era and that`s why the latter has a quicker tyre warmup phase and better qualy results in general speaking.
I agree and on top of that I don't think a whole set of engineers are this stupid to choose qualy pace over race if there is a big sacrifice for one of them.Seanspeed wrote: ↑21 May 2024, 15:30This isn't 'well known', just frequently speculated.atanatizante wrote: ↑21 May 2024, 14:20Some needed clarifications about this matter:
Since the hybrid era, it is well-known that HAM prioritizes race setup rather than the qualy one with RUS doing just the opposite since the ground effect car era and that`s why the latter has a quicker tyre warmup phase and better qualy results in general speaking.
I dont really believe it personally. Nobody in this era of F1 is biasing their setup towards qualifying.
Yes. From recollection, Sainz clocked in at ~30.x seconds pit lane time, while Hamilton went up all the way to 33.x
I wont take the bait this week. This speaks for itself.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 21:33Oh. His tyre pressures were fine. But he couldn't manage the pyschological pressure of losing pace hand over fist with a charging 44 car behind him.
If his tyres completely died to the point where they needed to pit him 6-7 laps later, he would have come out behind Sergio.
At that point, Russell's pace was quite stable. He was lapping high 1.20, low 1.21 fairly consistently.
Thats the issue with the cliff. There isnt a huge warning, you just fall off it. And then there was also the chance of a late safety car, which pitting George also covered them from.AR3-GP wrote: ↑22 May 2024, 21:07At that point, Russell's pace was quite stable. He was lapping high 1.20, low 1.21 fairly consistently.
I'm not implying that they were favoring Hamilton. Instead, I think it was a "Mercedes" strategy...one that doesn't make sense on its own. They are known for this... I don't think fastest lap was a primary motivation either. That was coincidence. They were really concerned that Russell couldn't manage 10 more laps with a 30 second lead and that objectively doesn't make sense...It's not the first time Mercedes does a strategy that doesn't make sense.