Flow-Vise in FP1
Any signs of flow separation? I don't trust my judgement.diffuser wrote: ↑24 May 2024, 22:39Flow-Vise in FP1
https://cdn-8.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... tin-a.webp
https://cdn-8.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... tin-a.webp
https://cdn-4.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... -amr2.webp
yep - but at Monaco that's not a disastrous thing, you can have a surprising amount of separation on a wing before it's at peak downforce. It's just quite draggy.jrdls wrote: ↑25 May 2024, 04:27Any signs of flow separation? I don't trust my judgement.diffuser wrote: ↑24 May 2024, 22:39Flow-Vise in FP1
https://cdn-8.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... tin-a.webp
https://cdn-8.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... tin-a.webp
https://cdn-4.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... -amr2.webp
Rolling stones lips beam wingAshwinv16 wrote: ↑20 Jun 2024, 22:33New Beam Wing and likely underfloor (beam wing now more surface area than the one in Monaco, but with more gradual of angle of attack(so less loaded)) (New rear wing hidden? (old wing in garrage)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GQgkl-CWwAA ... ame=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GQg5_z8X0AA ... ame=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GQgkksfW4AA ... ame=medium
Not sure if there are changer anywhere else
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GQgklR_XAAA ... ame=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GQgkj6iWMAI ... ame=medium