This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
according to the AmuS article about it, the PU from Miami will only return for Canada. The problem here was with engine #3, so they went back to the one from Bahrain.
Power isn't as important in Monaco, of course, but it could still partly explain why Leclerc lost ground compared to the sessions before, I guess.
what? even imola one had issues? oh Deer... how come sainz never have these issue? is it that charles more aggressive? I remember seeing that tech video from f1 tv, they showed how leclerc was agressive on the downshift compared to sainz.
according to the AmuS article about it, the PU from Miami will only return for Canada. The problem here was with engine #3, so they went back to the one from Bahrain.
according to the AmuS article about it, the PU from Miami will only return for Canada. The problem here was with engine #3, so they went back to the one from Bahrain.
Power isn't as important in Monaco, of course, but it could still partly explain why Leclerc lost ground compared to the sessions before, I guess.
what? even imola one had issues? oh Deer... how come sainz never have these issue? is it that charles more aggressive? I remember seeing that tech video from f1 tv, they showed how leclerc was agressive on the downshift compared to sainz.
Peter Windsor claims that Ferrari reckon that Leclerc was half a second slower than expected because of the issue in Q3 (something loose near the pedals). Was this confirmed by anyone else ?
according to the AmuS article about it, the PU from Miami will only return for Canada. The problem here was with engine #3, so they went back to the one from Bahrain.
Power isn't as important in Monaco, of course, but it could still partly explain why Leclerc lost ground compared to the sessions before, I guess.
what? even imola one had issues? oh Deer... how come sainz never have these issue? is it that charles more aggressive? I remember seeing that tech video from f1 tv, they showed how leclerc was agressive on the downshift compared to sainz.
Peter Windsor claims that Ferrari reckon that Leclerc was half a second slower than expected because of the issue in Q3 (something loose near the pedals). Was this confirmed by anyone else ?
I can’t really say anything for certain, but I feel like the pedal issue being worth 4-5 tenths is REALLY pushing it. That would mean Sainz was 8 tenths off the pace and that the SF24 is significantly faster than even the W10, despite weighing some 50kg more, with most of that difference being unsprung weight, not to mention the suspension simplification in the current regs.
It isn’t impossible, but I find it highly unlikely to be true.
I’m guessing it was something small like a screw or even like a shoelace in the footwell that might’ve cost Leclerc a tenth or something due to discomfort. But 4-5 seems highly unrealistic with a car that was good enough for pole on the first Q3 lap, let alone the 2nd.
I guess it would be consistent with the incredible pace in FP2 if it was 4-5 tenths, but FP2 was almost surely down to engine mode or just the Leclerc factor, along with just how consistently easy the SF24 seems to be to set up.
according to the AmuS article about it, the PU from Miami will only return for Canada. The problem here was with engine #3, so they went back to the one from Bahrain.
Power isn't as important in Monaco, of course, but it could still partly explain why Leclerc lost ground compared to the sessions before, I guess.
what? even imola one had issues? oh Deer... how come sainz never have these issue? is it that charles more aggressive? I remember seeing that tech video from f1 tv, they showed how leclerc was agressive on the downshift compared to sainz.
Peter Windsor claims that Ferrari reckon that Leclerc was half a second slower than expected because of the issue in Q3 (something loose near the pedals). Was this confirmed by anyone else ?
according to the AmuS article about it, the PU from Miami will only return for Canada. The problem here was with engine #3, so they went back to the one from Bahrain.
Power isn't as important in Monaco, of course, but it could still partly explain why Leclerc lost ground compared to the sessions before, I guess.
what? even imola one had issues? oh Deer... how come sainz never have these issue? is it that charles more aggressive? I remember seeing that tech video from f1 tv, they showed how leclerc was agressive on the downshift compared to sainz.
Peter Windsor claims that Ferrari reckon that Leclerc was half a second slower than expected because of the issue in Q3 (something loose near the pedals). Was this confirmed by anyone else ?
I call BS on this one.
Windsor has no sources inside Ferrari. Duchessa and Donadoni would be screaming from the rooftops if this was true.
Quick question guys, can Charles restart on H if allowed and can he take this race all through the end?
I am sure if tyre changes are allowed someone or all will make this change, this is going to be interesting.
how come sainz never have these issue? is it that charles more aggressive? I remember seeing that tech video from f1 tv, they showed how leclerc was agressive on the downshift compared to sainz.
