Cs98 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 23:24
Mosin123 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 23:09
Cs98 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 22:58
4-5 laps being the faster tyre, yes. I'm sure he would've had decent pace later too, but not as good as a fresh medium or hard.
But those in front was on old mediums, not new. old mediums that had been sliding around all over the shop..... they was worn, highly worn, you could tell, because LH was catching them with the hard tyre, and GR caught them extremly easy on his mediums. Softs would have been the tyre if that was Redbull, ill be shocked if Horner doesnt mention it some time, just for a dig at Toto.
George was in front of him on new mediums! How is this so hard to grasp? New softs behind new mediums makes no sense, you'd waste the best part of the tyre chasing your own teammate and then by the time you are supposed to overtake the McLarens you've already used up the best performance. Now if you only view it from the perspective of Hamilton (which I know most in this thread always do), then maybe you'd want the softs just to have a better chance of getting a shot of passing George in those first laps. But from a team perspective it doesn't make sense to adopt such a strategy since they don't care about the order between teammates, and wouldn't want them losing time fighting each other anyways.
All these issues for Lewis can be explained by one thing, track position due to poor quali.
Was, wasnt a head for long though was he.
your entilted to your opinion, thats fine. here is mine - and that is that the softs should have been on to go for the race win. you say life 4 - 5 laps, Pirelli says 17 - 23.......... Ill go with what Pirelli says, these are the ones who inspect the tyres after each session, have data, made the tyre. what they say holds way more weight.
Mercades was just protecting its new team leader. They made it obvious.