I don't get the TD from 2023, what was it TD078, has been removed?
It was TD018. And the guidance for flexible front wings has essentially completely shifted for 2024 compared to last year. Last year they tried to heavily police it now it seems that you are free to play in this region more
Wow, only one team was really doing it in 2023. Arguably the FIA sent AMR into a tail spin. Now they reverse their ---. I really dislike when they make changes in-season.organic wrote: ↑05 Jul 2024, 00:22It was TD018. And the guidance for flexible front wings has essentially completely shifted for 2024 compared to last year. Last year they tried to heavily police it now it seems that you are free to play in this region more
By the time TD018 was enforced, Aston Martin was already in a struggle for a couple of races. I think the effect of the flexing-wings is overstated on the Aston Martin. It's far from being their biggest problem. You don't go from fighting for podiums to barely making it out of Q1 just because of that.diffuser wrote: ↑05 Jul 2024, 02:18Wow, only one team was really doing it in 2023. Arguably the FIA sent AMR into a tail spin. Now they reverse their ---. I really dislike when they make changes in-season.
TD018 came in at Singapore properly but AMR had already been told to remove their Flexi wing at Barcelona earlier in the year. That's precisely when everything went wrong in terms of performance and car balanceEmag wrote: ↑05 Jul 2024, 10:03By the time TD018 was enforced, Aston Martin was already in a struggle for a couple of races. I think the effect of the flexing-wings is overstated on the Aston Martin. It's far from being their biggest problem. You don't go from fighting for podiums to barely making it out of Q1 just because of that.
Aston Martin was still really fast in Canada, just one race later. The timeline since 2023 just suggest poor understanding on their part. The flexi-wings are being used as an excuse by people here.organic wrote: ↑05 Jul 2024, 11:38TD018 came in at Singapore properly but AMR had already been told to remove their Flexi wing at Barcelona earlier in the year. That's precisely when everything went wrong in terms of performance and car balanceEmag wrote: ↑05 Jul 2024, 10:03By the time TD018 was enforced, Aston Martin was already in a struggle for a couple of races. I think the effect of the flexing-wings is overstated on the Aston Martin. It's far from being their biggest problem. You don't go from fighting for podiums to barely making it out of Q1 just because of that.
You cracked the Mercedes code! Or should I say Krackedpeewon wrote: ↑05 Jul 2024, 12:00Canada doesn't have long curves. It's mostly slow corners and straights. That's why AM was competitive there.
There is only one team whose innovations never get banned immediately. No matter how much they violate the spirit of the regulations. They always seem to have pre approval for their innovations. That's the team that's using flexy wings now so obviously FIA will approve it now.
FIA went against their own regulations and made racing worse because 1 team couldn't control their porpoising.
This teams drivers also never get penalized and their Team Principal has confidential FIA information before it's been made public.
When asked about the issue with the current car:It's not an improvement or what you call a leap forward, just for this kind of circuit and this kind of fast corner and with the kind of downforce that is needed here it's better. It is not an upgrade as such, it is something very specific for when you use this level of downforce.
The team is working in the wind tunnel on a very precise area because that's really what has to help us. We know what the problem is, we know what the diagnosis is.