basti313 wrote:Well, obviously the upgrade policy changed already and no one is even trying to deny the performance clause being in place -now-.Jurgen von Diaz wrote: ↑16 Jul 2024, 08:50Are you sure that the fresh clauses are for the old contract too (2024) and not just for 2025–2026, when the new contract takes effect?
It is usual for such a contract, that it replaces the old contract immediately. I have never heard of a serial contract elongation in sports.
Well, from everything we know I would not be relaxed as well. But what was the alternative? Not elongate and leave him floating would not have been good for anyone. And with the current performance RedBull could (only?) elongate on terms that benefit RedBull...Jurgen von Diaz wrote: ↑16 Jul 2024, 08:50Red Bull thought the new contract would have a relaxing effect on Pérez, but they were wrong; things went even worse.
I think this year’s performance clauses were there all along. They wouldn't had to make new contract. I highly doubt they downgraded this year’s clauses for Pérez in the middle of the season.
It’s normal to let drivers drive for the contract, not like this when a contract is handed to you even though you are driving like Sargeant. This is all about money, but on the other hand, Red Bull is making itself look foolish to start hesitating with their decisions only a few weeks after they signed an extension with Perez. If they are going to sack Pérez in the summer, it is a continuation of the Horner text scandal and Newey's exit, where the organization is messed up and making poor decisions.