Curbstone wrote: ↑19 Aug 2024, 11:19
I Reckon he would know about these tricks. Yes that speculation.
You believe he doesn't know, that's also speculation.
Maybe we should just leave is with that.
Regarding te bald part; 'The thief believes that everybody is like him', have a little faith in the intentions of the personnel (and the deterrent effect of non-disclosure agreements with undoubtedly high fines).
Generally engineers don't do it for the money but, so why discredit your own team...?
Absolutely agree on the first part that disagreement can be had without needing to go into the realms of SILLY RIDICULOUS etc etc. I just know for a fact that Calum does not touch those brakes and that's from the head mechanic of RB. Calum says a lot of things on Twitter, and fair play to him for that, I agree with most of what he posts. But his opinions on matters he is not directly involved with are still opinions.
Regarding the second part of your post I don't agree. It was also not with any nefarious assertions of staff selling secrets. That was not the spirit of my post.
My reasoning is very reductive to the moving parts of a season in F1 and the ratio of IP investment to personnel rotations. You have RB personnel from 2022-3 in Mercedes/Ferrari/McLaren/AT/Alpine/Williams (delete where appropriate) pit garage in 2024.
In a budget cap era we are seeing staff moving at a higher frequency as margin is squeezed.
If your entire assembly team and their backups, including the pit staff know the details of a silver bullet, you will lose that very quickly when just 1 of those staff leave. 70k dollar to 95k dollar pay bump and Merc ferrari etc get details on a design that would cost millions to explore and build.
So why would you tell your entire assembly team when you can reduce your risk by only including the core component (the actual person responsible)?