Yea lewis said multiple times the Mclaren would be too fast for them today after quali and before the race. i dont know why Merc put him on the softs, then didnt listen to him and pitted him early just to add to it
He did.GrizzleBoy wrote: ↑22 Sep 2024, 15:42The only goal of Merc is to not lose face.
Their sharehokders and sponsors would ask questions if the aggregate fastest, highest point scoring driver leaves the team and the driver replacing him has done nothing but put it in the wall after literally 2 laps in F1.
George needs to finish in front.
Of course. Hamilton managed the tyres quite well. He was not holding Russell or Piastri. Russell doing politics as usual whine on the radio to pretend the opposite214270 wrote: ↑22 Sep 2024, 15:55I don’t mind the S start personally, I don’t think that in itself was the problem - it was unnecessarily aggressive maybe but doable. It’s the very early stop that was the undoing; HAM looked comfortable holding a steady lead over PIA & RUS in that 1st stint. Either way, race pace seemed the worst out of the top 4. Hopefully, the Austin updates bring performance.
They didn't have fresh softs i'm sure.Hammerfist wrote: ↑22 Sep 2024, 15:59Imagine they thought gaining positions at the start would be likely at Singapore, with such a short run to turn one. Even Lando was able to keep the lead after lap 1 starting from pole for the first time ever. And to think even new softs would not last enough to make it a half decent strategy choice. But no they put him on used softs. Sorry it smells like sabotage to me.