"Are you saying that the battery is used in the same way during overtaking/defending and the regular laps?DoctorRadio wrote: ↑23 Sep 2024, 23:17Are you saying that the battery is used in the same way during overtaking/defending and the regular laps?mwillems wrote: ↑23 Sep 2024, 22:40Was Lando not using his battery??DoctorRadio wrote: ↑23 Sep 2024, 22:04
It’s you who see what you want to see; you take the laps in free air as an absolute point of reference for pace on Hards, when in some of those laps the car that has executed the overtake recharges the battery and the tyres have overheated because of the overtake and need to cool down.
Really, I will say that Mclaren was untouchable even by Leclerc in an hypothetical head to head, if that’s what pleases you.
As I've now stated a multitude of times. That .2s was when neither driver was overtaking or in traffic. It is a real and representative example of the pace of the two cars on the same compound. Leclerc was nowhere near his rivals for the bulk of the Hard stint. He was racing for many laps in the same conditions as Lando. He was .2s faster on average, a number that is less than the 6 lap delta and on tyres needing to do 6 laps less and so can be pushed more.
The Ferrari was not on Mclarens pace yesterday.
That’s news to me.
My last post here, I’ll go down to your logic and compare lap 43-48, both in free air, 0,5s/lap advantage Leclerc (62.5s gap on lap 43, 60s on lap 48).
Lap 51-56, after Leclerc had to overtake Hamilton (overheated tyres in dirty air, depleted battery for 1-2 subsequent laps), gap went down 0.4s/lap.
Accounting for the race time he lost with Alonso and the 2 Mercedes I have 0,6s, so it’s more or less that.
And you have 0.2s, so I give up.
I reiterate I have never said Leclerc was fastest, but he would have pressured Norris, I’ve no doubt on that.
That’s news to me."
No, you made specific mention of recharging the battery. When and how they use the battery doesn't change how much they recharge, both cars will recharge the same.
He breezed by Hamilton and was barely impacted, Sainz let him by, he breezed past Alonso, something he couldn't do on mediums because amongst other reasons, the car was not performing as well on mediums. The idea his tyres had overheated with each overtake is fabricated, because he went straight by all but Russell. After overtaking Hamilton to go into clean air, the delta was much lower. After Hamilton Charles did not get the same pace that you cherry picked out from his hard stint. From his hard stint to near where he caught Russell, he was .166s a lap faster than Lando. You can clearly see in the chart that he was minimally impacted by the overtakes
Better we give up, it does seem like you very much want introduce all sorts of "assumed" factors as to why the Ferrari was just being held up, when in reality, it was very far from being held up on the hards. He just wasn't as fast as you seem to suggest.
You've no doubt he'd have pressured Lando, but he could barely pressure Alonso and Hulkenberg let alone mount a credible challenge on softs.