yooogurt wrote: ↑15 Oct 2024, 17:23It is known by the acronym 677 or as the “Lewis car”.
https://www.gazzetta.it/motori/ferrari/ ... n-f1.shtml
yooogurt wrote: ↑15 Oct 2024, 17:23It is known by the acronym 677 or as the “Lewis car”.
https://www.gazzetta.it/motori/ferrari/ ... n-f1.shtml
The alienation of CL has already begun.yooogurt wrote: ↑15 Oct 2024, 17:23It is known by the acronym 677 or as the “Lewis car”.
https://www.gazzetta.it/motori/ferrari/ ... n-f1.shtml
I don't think Hamilton's cockpit preference is really a thing. W11 was a ridiculous transoceanic tanker and the cockpit was very far forward because extending rear axle rearwards allowed greater floor area and downforce and I can't remember him ever complaining about cockpit position
Right, the French driver, with a French TP and TD, who just recently had his contract extended, is being alienated by a lighthearted phrase describing next season's car and his (new) 7x WDC winning teammate.Chuckjr wrote: ↑16 Oct 2024, 05:44The alienation of CL has already begun.yooogurt wrote: ↑15 Oct 2024, 17:23It is known by the acronym 677 or as the “Lewis car”.
https://www.gazzetta.it/motori/ferrari/ ... n-f1.shtml
smh.
I'm guessing it's all about the driver sitting central to the CoP of the aero platform, and that the current cars have it farther back then the previous gen because of the lack of barge board freedom.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑16 Oct 2024, 09:34I don't think Hamilton's cockpit preference is really a thing. W11 was a ridiculous transoceanic tanker and the cockpit was very far forward because extending rear axle rearwards allowed greater floor area and downforce and I can't remember him ever complaining about cockpit position
https://cdn11.bigcommerce.com/s-yrkef1j ... 12.jpg?c=2
The idea behind W13 and forward cockpit position was packaging and aligning CoG with expected CoP position. Like Ferrari, Mercedes went the classic route of venturi floor design in 2022 - placing the throat fairly forward and replicating aero foil geometry with the tunnel roof, which places overall CoP more forward than going with Red Bull route. Inwashing and clean rear end was a packaging consequence, because you need to place everything as close to CoG in all directions to reduce inertia of the car.
For a long time now, driver sits ahead of CoG, which is always (more or less, depending on velocity) ahead of CoP along longitudinal X axis. According to 2022-2025 rules, your CoG at all times during Q session needs to be at least 44.6% front and no more than 53.9% rear, ie you have 55mm between both boundary CoG X positions if you maximise the wheelbase to 3600mm. W13 cockpit was 150+ mm ahead of RB cockpit and F1-75 cockpit was 100-110mm ahead of RB cockpit too, obviously all 3 cars were within weight distribution limits.
I believe it's important for Ferrari to check on a demanding track what the Monza package and the Singapore wing are delivering. I don't expect any significant new parts, except for load adjustments (upper flap for downforce). I don't expect Serra to be on track for this triple-header.
He wanted to spend more time in UK after his wife suddenly passed away in March 2016. Ferrari wanted him back in Maranello full time instead and Marchione wanted him there asap. They agreed to part ways in July that year, Allison obviously couldn't leave his children alone in that situation. He was chassis TD since mid-2013 and full TD soon afterwards
Everyone that has reported on Ferrari upgrades has used words like “could” “seem” “I think” “I believe”, very speculative. It seems no one really knows, the team might just be very tightly lipped, which is quite atypical.ScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑16 Oct 2024, 16:05Duchessa (F1.uno)
I believe it's important for Ferrari to check on a demanding track what the Monza package and the Singapore wing are delivering. I don't expect any significant new parts, except for load adjustments (upper flap for downforce). I don't expect Serra to be on track for this triple-header.
Ok, thanks.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑16 Oct 2024, 18:09He wanted to spend more time in UK after his wife suddenly passed away in March 2016. Ferrari wanted him back in Maranello full time instead and Marchione wanted him there asap. They agreed to part ways in July that year, Allison obviously couldn't leave his children alone in that situation. He was chassis TD since mid-2013 and full TD soon afterwards
Next season is going to be absolutely unbearable on driver discussion, good lord.catent wrote: ↑16 Oct 2024, 13:16Right, the French driver, with a French TP and TD, who just recently had his contract extended, is being alienated by a lighthearted phrase describing next season's car and his (new) 7x WDC winning teammate.Chuckjr wrote: ↑16 Oct 2024, 05:44The alienation of CL has already begun.yooogurt wrote: ↑15 Oct 2024, 17:23It is known by the acronym 677 or as the “Lewis car”.
https://www.gazzetta.it/motori/ferrari/ ... n-f1.shtml
smh.
This notion that Leclerc is being alienated, pushed out, or otherwise undermined, is really hard to believe and tremendously premature to be claiming. Just ask the man himself: he's content at Ferrari, feels good about their future prospects, and is reportedly fully supportive of Hamilton's arrival (per Vasseur and Leclerc himself). To claim Leclerc is being alienated by Hamilton's arrival is biased opinion without evidence.
We know you don't like Lewis Hamilton on a (deeply) personal level. We know you think acquiring Lewis Hamilton was a bad idea for Ferrari and disagree with their decision. Naturally, you're biased in a way that will make you inclined to believe the narrative you're suggesting is true (even in the presence of reporting indicating otherwise).
As you say, the person who has been definitive was Fred and I think he would know: https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/ferr ... /10658544/scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑16 Oct 2024, 18:20Everyone that has reported on Ferrari upgrades has used words like “could” “seem” “I think” “I believe”, very speculative. It seems no one really knows, the team might just be very tightly lipped, which is quite atypical.ScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑16 Oct 2024, 16:05Duchessa (F1.uno)
I believe it's important for Ferrari to check on a demanding track what the Monza package and the Singapore wing are delivering. I don't expect any significant new parts, except for load adjustments (upper flap for downforce). I don't expect Serra to be on track for this triple-header.
The only sources that have been definitive in their reports are Corriere & Franco Nugnes. Let's see, I find it strange that Vasseur would say they are bringing new stuff and then don't.
In confirming an update package would be added to the car at the Circuit of the Americas, Vasseur revealed focus is then primarily on next year's machinery.
"We all know that we already started the development of the next car, and we try to do our best to have small upgrades at the next one [race]," he said.
"I think it will be probably the last one for everybody; that will be true for us, but it will be true for the other teams.