I have to agree, but a solution is to add armco at all corners. If you are unwilling because it makes it unsafe for MotoGP then I am sure some other 'car damaging' solution can be found!
I have to agree, but a solution is to add armco at all corners. If you are unwilling because it makes it unsafe for MotoGP then I am sure some other 'car damaging' solution can be found!
600mm of grass on the out side of all of the corners for me
Pls understand FIA and drivers lobbying for rules that have a bias for defending driver. This is the DRS era when the defending driver is helpless, in most cases it is a blow past. If that does not happen and it gets stretched to the braking zone, I totally understand the current rules favoring defending driver both when they are on the inside or outside.dialtone wrote: ↑22 Oct 2024, 16:10Here’s an interesting reddit post with all the rule changes instigated by Max’s behavior:
https://reddit.com/r/formula1/comments/ ... rstappens/
I will point out the driving off track from the 2021 brazil incident that clearly wasn’t applied here but is spot on applicable but stewards forgot it exists.
This is not how FIA/FOM reason. They introduced this new formula with the explicit intent to make it easier to follow closely and still kept DRS. They want more overtakes and more battles. If the car overtaken is fast, when they will get DRS post passing they can pass back again. Making it easier to pass is the whole point of these rules.FW17 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2024, 02:47Pls understand FIA and drivers lobbying for rules that have a bias for defending driver. This is the DRS era when the defending driver is helpless, in most cases it is a blow past. If that does not happen and it gets stretched to the braking zone, I totally understand the current rules favoring defending driver both when they are on the inside or outside.
Rules are understandable when the overtaking driver already such a huge advantage.
Intent statements are pc statement, wordings are the actual intent.dialtone wrote: ↑23 Oct 2024, 03:38This is not how FIA/FOM reason. They introduced this new formula with the explicit intent to make it easier to follow closely and still kept DRS. They want more overtakes and more battles. If the car overtaken is fast, when they will get DRS post passing they can pass back again. Making it easier to pass is the whole point of these rules.FW17 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2024, 02:47Pls understand FIA and drivers lobbying for rules that have a bias for defending driver. This is the DRS era when the defending driver is helpless, in most cases it is a blow past. If that does not happen and it gets stretched to the braking zone, I totally understand the current rules favoring defending driver both when they are on the inside or outside.
Rules are understandable when the overtaking driver already such a huge advantage.