Courtesy of Mercedes
It's all pretty easy to explain, they brought the B chassis to Miami, which solved a lot of the problems with the tires. During the season, there were also updates that allowed the tires to work better.AR3-GP wrote: ↑21 Nov 2024, 20:28What I'm curious about in this saga is the lack of comment from Mclaren. Mclaren have offered a public defense to every other allegation levied against them this year (brake cooling holes around Silverstone, mini-DRS). Unless I missed something, they have not made any comment on this subject. One could choose to read into this in a lot of ways...
Also, as a general comment, Mclaren was still struggling with overheating tires at the beginning of the year and then suddenly, they weren't. I have never heard of a team fixing tire overheating issues within a season.
Mclaren struggled with tyre overheating only until they brought their Miami upgrade package. It is perfectly reasonable to expect such a massive overgrade package to fundamentally change a car's behaviour.
Actually something changed with the Mclaren in China which was before Miami's raft of upgrades. It's possible that they experimented with it then to get a baseline before the aero updates came in. China is notorious for high tire deg and after the safety car, Norris dropped Leclerc like a bad habit.PapayaFan481 wrote: ↑22 Nov 2024, 07:39
Mclaren struggled with tyre overheating only until they brought their Miami upgrade package. It is perfectly reasonable to expect such a massive overgrade package to fundamentally change a car's behaviour.
In the 4 races before Shanghai Ferrari had Mclaren easily under control in race pace, then Mclaren beat Ferrari at Shanghai and never looked back.AR3-GP wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 03:02
Actually something changed with the Mclaren in China which was before Miami's raft of upgrades. It's possible that they experimented with it then to get a baseline before the aero updates came in. China is notorious for high tire deg and after the safety car, Norris dropped Leclerc like a bad habit.
Please point to where there has been any evidence whatsoever that any team actually did use water in their tyres (except Red Bull who admitted they used to do it). All this finger pointing at McLaren ignores that Mercedes were also accused of doing it.stewie325 wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 08:57So McLaren was dominating with a 30s lead, and a few races later they are 30s behind.
Vegas track conditions favouring the Merc aside, I'm now a lot more inclined to believe there was some water trickery.
But it's difficult to understand if that's the only effect, or their mini-DRS rear wing has also been a huge cost. It would have been used at Vegas..
It's the illegal mini DRS wing with a double penalty, without the top speed bonus with Spa wing they had to use Monza wing which cost them a lot of downforce in corners + without using Monza wing previously they only relied on FP3 and simulator to get the setup and balance right and as we saw they didn't get it right. Their overall gap in the race was exaggerated because of this.stewie325 wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 08:57So McLaren was dominating with a 30s lead, and a few races later they are 30s behind.
Vegas track conditions favouring the Merc aside, I'm now a lot more inclined to believe there was some water trickery.
But it's difficult to understand if that's the only effect, or their mini-DRS rear wing has also been a huge cost. It would have been used at Vegas..
Due to the low temperatures as we've seen all year: Canada, Silverstone, Spa, Vegas.
The whole story started because Pirelli found water and watermarks after Singapore in the tires.PapayaFan481 wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 09:46
Please point to where there has been any evidence whatsoever that any team actually did use water in their tyres