2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
FW17
170
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

Vappy wrote:
14 Dec 2024, 14:27
FW17 wrote:
13 Dec 2024, 13:35
wuzak wrote:
13 Dec 2024, 12:50


They will be very fast at accelerating - that's where the maximum ERS deployment will be used the most.



It will be like the LMP1s from the 2010s. Though, perhaps, without the speed plateauing very early on the straight.

Like the porsche 919 evo
What a machine. You could hear that bad boy clear as day when it fully deployed
Look at the deployment strategy by Porsche engineers. It would be similar to F1 race, battery need not be fully charged, Electrical energy regenerated and used at every instance.


User avatar
bananapeel23
9
Joined: 14 Feb 2023, 22:43
Location: Sweden

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

Seanspeed wrote:
12 Dec 2024, 23:53
bananapeel23 wrote:
12 Dec 2024, 23:03
They will just be really slow under acceleration, like laughably slow, but that is a large part of why they will produce good racing.
That's not actually good for overtaking. It means a stronger concertina effect that means it'll be farther down the straight before the car behind starts going faster than the car ahead, meaning there's a shorter distance to actually get alongside.

I think we'll be clamoring for DRS back again before too long. DRS got a bad rap, but it was so often poorly balanced in terms of how much of it was allowed on a given track, and was especially bad when it was given to cars on back-to-back longer straights.
Stronger concertina, but more time on the straight and the ability to deploy a ton of ERS for the following car, leading to similar speed deltas, but at the cost of losing a bunch of deployment on the following lap, allowing reovertaking.

User avatar
bananapeel23
9
Joined: 14 Feb 2023, 22:43
Location: Sweden

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

wuzak wrote:
13 Dec 2024, 12:50
bananapeel23 wrote:
12 Dec 2024, 23:03
They will just be really slow under acceleration, like laughably slow, but that is a large part of why they will produce good racing.
They will be very fast at accelerating - that's where the maximum ERS deployment will be used the most.

It will be like the LMP1s from the 2010s. Though, perhaps, without the speed plateauing very early on the straight.
I don't think they will be able to deploy the full 350KW in traction zones. They will still be slower under acceleration, even if that is where they will lose the least (apart from the end of straight due to the loss of drag).

User avatar
bananapeel23
9
Joined: 14 Feb 2023, 22:43
Location: Sweden

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

deadhead wrote:
13 Dec 2024, 01:44
Tell me we will be able to avoid this sort of monstrosity?

https://ibb.co/3pc22Dg
Monstrosity?

It's beautiful and functional! The bargeboards were an engineering marvel.

User avatar
Holm86
247
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

FW17 wrote:
14 Dec 2024, 15:02
Vappy wrote:
14 Dec 2024, 14:27
FW17 wrote:
13 Dec 2024, 13:35



Like the porsche 919 evo
What a machine. You could hear that bad boy clear as day when it fully deployed
Look at the deployment strategy by Porsche engineers. It would be similar to F1 race, battery need not be fully charged, Electrical energy regenerated and used at every instance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQmSUHhP3ug
They're not gonna be anyway near the 919 Evo.
The maximum harvest per lap is 8.5 MJ, thats 24 seconds of full power per lap.
And the maximum charge of the ES at any given moment is 4 MJ, meaning that you can only run full power for a maximum 11.5 seconds at the time.

I doub't these engines will run at full power very often. And full power from the new 2026 engines will be around 750kw = 1006 hp, at a maximum. The 919 Evo had a combined HP output of 1160hp

User avatar
organic
1056
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

Looks like diffuser strakes have been allowed with issue 10 of the rules, along with increased freedom with dimensions of diffuser sidewalls



Also from Qvist_Designs
Image

Feels like the aerodynamics of the new ruleset are going more complicated again after the relative simplicity of 2022-

Seanspeed
Seanspeed
5
Joined: 20 Feb 2019, 20:12

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

bananapeel23 wrote:
16 Dec 2024, 11:39
Seanspeed wrote:
12 Dec 2024, 23:53
bananapeel23 wrote:
12 Dec 2024, 23:03
They will just be really slow under acceleration, like laughably slow, but that is a large part of why they will produce good racing.
That's not actually good for overtaking. It means a stronger concertina effect that means it'll be farther down the straight before the car behind starts going faster than the car ahead, meaning there's a shorter distance to actually get alongside.

I think we'll be clamoring for DRS back again before too long. DRS got a bad rap, but it was so often poorly balanced in terms of how much of it was allowed on a given track, and was especially bad when it was given to cars on back-to-back longer straights.
Stronger concertina, but more time on the straight and the ability to deploy a ton of ERS for the following car, leading to similar speed deltas, but at the cost of losing a bunch of deployment on the following lap, allowing reovertaking.
Less time on the straight given the general lower drag nature of these newer cars, actually. This will actually make it worse.

Slower initial acceleration, but once they do get up to speed, that low drag aspect is gonna shorten the distance from that point on to the braking point. It's literally going to exacerbate the concertina effect in terms of making it super hard for the following car to get a chance. Especially out of any slower corners.

Vappy
Vappy
0
Joined: 14 Mar 2024, 20:09

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

organic wrote:
19 Dec 2024, 22:13
Looks like diffuser strakes have been allowed with issue 10 of the rules, along with increased freedom with dimensions of diffuser sidewalls



Also from Qvist_Designs
https://i.imgur.com/Znxpghb.jpeg

Feels like the aerodynamics of the new ruleset are going more complicated again after the relative simplicity of 2022-
Looking at that floor and diffuser, I suspect teams will want to put the rear ride height up nice and high like in previous generations to create an effectively larger diffuser?

User avatar
FW17
170
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

Holm86 wrote:
17 Dec 2024, 00:17
FW17 wrote:
14 Dec 2024, 15:02
Vappy wrote:
14 Dec 2024, 14:27


What a machine. You could hear that bad boy clear as day when it fully deployed
Look at the deployment strategy by Porsche engineers. It would be similar to F1 race, battery need not be fully charged, Electrical energy regenerated and used at every instance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQmSUHhP3ug
They're not gonna be anyway near the 919 Evo.
The maximum harvest per lap is 8.5 MJ, thats 24 seconds of full power per lap.
And the maximum charge of the ES at any given moment is 4 MJ, meaning that you can only run full power for a maximum 11.5 seconds at the time.

I doub't these engines will run at full power very often. And full power from the new 2026 engines will be around 750kw = 1006 hp, at a maximum. The 919 Evo had a combined HP output of 1160hp
Engines have not been developed since 2021, Max power from engine could be around 450 KW

4MJ limit is the maximum allowed discharge at a time, They can recharge and deploy multiple time during the lap.

User avatar
FW17
170
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

organic wrote:
19 Dec 2024, 22:13

Also from Qvist_Designs
Image

Feels like the aerodynamics of the new ruleset are going more complicated again after the relative simplicity of 2022-
Why is the gearbox represented like this? wouldn't they follow current size of if not even slimmer?
Image

If the idea of the rule set is to have airflow straight or inwash at the entrance of the floor near the cockpit, why is the floor plank step curved like in the current rule set?
Image
Image
Last edited by FW17 on 23 Dec 2024, 18:44, edited 1 time in total.

DDopey
DDopey
0
Joined: 02 Nov 2022, 09:54

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

So with all this more complicated aero, will that create more air disturbance ? And if then also power deployment becomes an issue, will there be any overtaking at all ?