Sorry that's lost on me, could you explain please?De Jokke wrote:We can become 3rd which means next year: return of the RED Five (mansell => hamilton)
If McLaren finish 3rd in the constructors then their cars will be numbered 5 and 6. Number 1 and 2 follow the drivers champion, 3 and 4 go to second in the constructors championship, 5 and 6 to 3rd, etc.richard_leeds wrote:Sorry that's lost on me, could you explain please?De Jokke wrote:We can become 3rd which means next year: return of the RED Five (mansell => hamilton)
That WCC table is looking tight, the points lost in Oz and Monza might turn out too be expensive mistakes. I heard that the garages will be smaller next year to fit in more teams. McL are in danger of getting a very small garage next year if they finish too far down the table.
Number 5 is also the second number with most wins in F1, having been surpassed by 1 only recently (200x, with schumacher). The list of drivers to have won races with number 5 is mighty impressive. I think Senna is one of the few greats that haven't actually won races with nº 5.myurr wrote:5, in red lettering, was Nigel Mansell's famous number when at Williams.
Miguel wrote:Number 5 is also the second number with most wins in F1, having been surpassed by 1 only recently (200x, with schumacher). The list of drivers to have won races with number 5 is mighty impressive. I think Senna is one of the few greats that haven't actually won races with nº 5.myurr wrote:5, in red lettering, was Nigel Mansell's famous number when at Williams.
I remember when, but I don't know why (although it is logical, as numbers reflect previous year results) - the changed happened between 1995 and 1996.CMSMJ1 wrote:I don't recall when the process changed and numbers issued equated to the constructors position. Anybody know when and why this was changed?
I followed very little of that era. Although my father did watch F1 before, and I have memories of McLarens driven by Prost and Senna going down Mirabeau, I only started following F1 actively in 1994 (I was 13 back then).CMSMJ1 wrote:I am sure you are enough of a veteran to remember when the only number change was between the championship winning team and the previous champions. The "winningest" numbers, I guess, will be 1,2,5,6,27,28,11,12 as this was when McLaren, Williams, Lotus and Ferrari were sharing all the wins and when the titel was decied one of the teams swapped numbers.
Ferrari used to be 11 and 12. At least Gilles drove Ferrari nº 12 when Jody Scheckter won his WDC. Alan Jones won in 1980, and so Williams got 1 and 2 and Ferrari got 27 and 28.Hence Tyrell were 3+4 for ever and Ferrari were 27+28, until Prost took the no1 and left McLaren with then 27+28, which then swapped back @ Suzuka with Senna taking Prost out.
I don't recall when the process changed and numbers issued equated to the constructors position. Anybody know when and why this was changed?
The question should be: will fisichella do enough to score some points to prevent Mclaren from finishing third?Miguel wrote:I followed very little of that era. Although my father did watch F1 before, and I have memories of McLarens driven by Prost and Senna going down Mirabeau, I only started following F1 actively in 1994 (I was 13 back then).CMSMJ1 wrote:I am sure you are enough of a veteran to remember when the only number change was between the championship winning team and the previous champions. The "winningest" numbers, I guess, will be 1,2,5,6,27,28,11,12 as this was when McLaren, Williams, Lotus and Ferrari were sharing all the wins and when the titel was decied one of the teams swapped numbers.
Ferrari used to be 11 and 12. At least Gilles drove Ferrari nº 12 when Jody Scheckter won his WDC. Alan Jones won in 1980, and so Williams got 1 and 2 and Ferrari got 27 and 28.Hence Tyrell were 3+4 for ever and Ferrari were 27+28, until Prost took the no1 and left McLaren with then 27+28, which then swapped back @ Suzuka with Senna taking Prost out.
I don't recall when the process changed and numbers issued equated to the constructors position. Anybody know when and why this was changed?
However, what I had in mind when I mentioned nº 5 was Jim Clark in a british racing green lotus. Back then, teams didn't have allocated numbers, and even changed between races. I've read that sometimes the organisers gave the numbers according to inscription order. I desperately wish that Ferrari holds to 3rd place, so that maybe Alonso will have nº 5 next year (kinda childish, I know).
Back on topic, I don't expect such a strong showing by McLaren in Suzuka. By no means do I expect the "suckage" seen in Silverstone, and Lewis might sneak into the podium, but I expect them to be around 6-8th place. KERS plus a strong engine will certainly help between Spoon and Turn 1 (senna versus prost corner). The esses in sector 1 will probably be troublesome.
Finally, I am astonished by the number of upgrades McLaren have introduced to fix their car throughout the year.