Of course, thank you.
There can be all sorts of reasons that aren't as obvious as many like to leap towards.billamend wrote: ↑19 Jan 2025, 19:35What is almost confirmed is that Key and ~Stella~ Seidl put Peter P “on a closet” and didn’t involve him much on the car design.
Not negating your statement and yes when the team was underperforming they were also underfinaced. We all remeber the bare cars with absolute no sponsors. But i think the main thing was the parity of the engines. Now customers are given the same engines. gone are the days when a customer team had 150 hp less than the works team (just remember when customer teams were given maping with extra hp during a race to defend from their main competitors). We now have a seat at the design table at Merc HPP. That i think was crucial. Even without the cost cap I think that Zak would eventualy build up a budget similar to Fer, Merc, RB and we would be competitive. it would have probably taken quite a lot longer for us to fight for championships, thats for sure.-wkst- wrote: ↑20 Jan 2025, 08:37The most important reason why McLaren wasn't competitive for a long time is just MONEY. Without the budget cap the team would still be nowhere near the top, as others would simply outspend them by a heavy sum of money. Top calibre engineers would have never joined them.
I do not know if this is true or in any way relevant for McLaren.genarro wrote: ↑20 Jan 2025, 11:54But i think the main thing was the parity of the engines. Now customers are given the same engines. gone are the days when a customer team had 150 hp less than the works team (just remember when customer teams were given maping with extra hp during a race to defend from their main competitors). We now have a seat at the design table at Merc HPP. That i think was crucial.
Power Units were always seen as an easy cope-out for people because on the first 2 years of the modern hybrid era, the customers and the works team did not get the same engines.basti313 wrote: ↑20 Jan 2025, 12:50I do not know if this is true or in any way relevant for McLaren.genarro wrote: ↑20 Jan 2025, 11:54But i think the main thing was the parity of the engines. Now customers are given the same engines. gone are the days when a customer team had 150 hp less than the works team (just remember when customer teams were given maping with extra hp during a race to defend from their main competitors). We now have a seat at the design table at Merc HPP. That i think was crucial.
McLaren never had the issue, first with Honda as "works team", then parity with Renault, whom they could beat. The time with Merc started with the party mode ban.
I also do not see the point on the "design table". Was this different to 2022? When Merc repacked the engine, McLaren was clearly again far from optimal with packing and cooling.
A shame really. I liked that McLaren always showed the real car and not just painted a livery onto last years model.bauc wrote: ↑18 Jan 2025, 22:30https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GhfyU6oXwAA ... me=900x900
They will not show the new car untill preseason day 1, this makes me supper happy and worried and the same time![]()
![]()
Money while important won't make you win championships in F1 (see Toyota). What matters is building the right culture in a team to get the most out of the talent you have. Which is what Zak Brown has been so assiduous about since he became CEO. He's made some tough calls to get McLaren where they are.-wkst- wrote: ↑20 Jan 2025, 08:37The most important reason why McLaren wasn't competitive for a long time is just MONEY. Without the budget cap the team would still be nowhere near the top, as others would simply outspend them by a heavy sum of money. Top calibre engineers would have never joined them.
This isn't really true at all. They lacked sponsors, but the few sponsors they had were relatively big money deals, and the Bahrainis pumped cash into the team every year to help make up for it. They were being outspent by Red Bull/Mercedes/Ferrari, sure, but not by a massive amount.-wkst- wrote: ↑20 Jan 2025, 08:37The most important reason why McLaren wasn't competitive for a long time is just MONEY. Without the budget cap the team would still be nowhere near the top, as others would simply outspend them by a heavy sum of money. Top calibre engineers would have never joined them.
What I am saying is that in my opinion (just a guy who likes F1) Mclaren would eventualy get the budget to compete at the front. The main thing was to get the MTC in order and firing on all cylinders. it would just probably take a lot more time. The cost cap did help not just McLaren but the whole sport.-wkst- wrote: ↑20 Jan 2025, 17:54After all money is the most important thing, because it's the base. And that's what they were lacking, when they didn't have success. Without the financial fundament, I can have the best culture or the best team structure, but if the best guys work for other teams and my infrastructure is outdated, I have no chance. Who believes that McLaren would currently drive at the front without the budget cap believes in fairy tales in my opinion.