I think I get it.Henri wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 13:39I was corrected the guy saying McLaren has the same value to charge Mercedes rates.. Mercedes f1 the team is more profitable than McLaren automotive. And Mercedes was spending 1 billion and making profit before the budget capmwillems wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 13:08Right, and the conversation was about how older Mclaren sponsors signed on smaller rates are expiring and being replaced with much better deals for the team. Nobody mentioned the number of sponsors, I think, conversation was only about the increasing value of Mclaren sponsorship as a result of success.
McLaren are a great historic team but no if a team can't attract a title sponsor than no. I mean McLaren was saved by the budget cap. Redbull Mercedes and Ferrari didnt care. McLaren hadcto sell there headquarters because of finance struggles and no sponsorsCjC wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 20:58I think I get it.Henri wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 13:39I was corrected the guy saying McLaren has the same value to charge Mercedes rates.. Mercedes f1 the team is more profitable than McLaren automotive. And Mercedes was spending 1 billion and making profit before the budget capmwillems wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 13:08
Right, and the conversation was about how older Mclaren sponsors signed on smaller rates are expiring and being replaced with much better deals for the team. Nobody mentioned the number of sponsors, I think, conversation was only about the increasing value of Mclaren sponsorship as a result of success.
Do you mean because Mercedes don’t necessarily need sponsorship to run the team they can ‘demand’ a higher rate off any new sponsor?
Where as McLaren need sponsorship to run the race team so will lower their rate for a new sponsor?
If so, it’s a valid point you make, however I did initially say if we just value the teams on the current ground effect era results then McLaren are more than a match in value as Mercedes, if either Lando or Oscar had won the 2024 WDC as well then in my opinion McLaren would be a more attractive proposition to sponsors than Mercedes.
I can tell you that my arguments were the same as I was younger, but history doesn't pay your bills, as happened to McLaren in 2020. Williams is anyway irrelevant for many, many years now. As McLaren would be result-wise without the cap.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 16:40Henri I don't want to sound disrespectful but Mclaren as a name is as high as Ferrari. Mercedes and Red Bull are nowhere near Mclaren in terms of history and an F1 name. F1 doesn't exist without Ferrari, Mclaren or Williams while nobody will care if Red Bull or Mercedes leave F1. It was always like this and it will always be like this. These 3 teams are F1. As for sponsors Mercedes who was dominant during 2014 to 2021 are nothing 3 years now and actually lost sponsors. Mclaren who was nothing during 2014 to 2021 and empty of sponsors are now on top and trying to find space in the car to put sponsors. Even Ferrari who used to be on top from 1999 to 2007 were insignificant 16 years now both in titles and sponsors (only recently they got HP and never had a good sponsor since Vodafone) and needed Hamilton to be on the spotlight. Things change and evolve and you should not take things for granted.
Sponsors don't care about F1 history. They care about the return for their investment. Most of them do at least.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 16:40Henri I don't want to sound disrespectful but Mclaren as a name is as high as Ferrari. Mercedes and Red Bull are nowhere near Mclaren in terms of history and an F1 name. F1 doesn't exist without Ferrari, Mclaren or Williams while nobody will care if Red Bull or Mercedes leave F1. It was always like this and it will always be like this. These 3 teams are F1. As for sponsors Mercedes who was dominant during 2014 to 2021 are nothing 3 years now and actually lost sponsors. Mclaren who was nothing during 2014 to 2021 and empty of sponsors are now on top and trying to find space in the car to put sponsors. Even Ferrari who used to be on top from 1999 to 2007 were insignificant 16 years now both in titles and sponsors (only recently they got HP and never had a good sponsor since Vodafone) and needed Hamilton to be on the spotlight. Things change and evolve and you should not take things for granted.
This has nothing to do with what is being said.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 16:40Henri I don't want to sound disrespectful but Mclaren as a name is as high as Ferrari. Mercedes and Red Bull are nowhere near Mclaren in terms of history and an F1 name. F1 doesn't exist without Ferrari, Mclaren or Williams while nobody will care if Red Bull or Mercedes leave F1. It was always like this and it will always be like this. These 3 teams are F1. As for sponsors Mercedes who was dominant during 2014 to 2021 are nothing 3 years now and actually lost sponsors. Mclaren who was nothing during 2014 to 2021 and empty of sponsors are now on top and trying to find space in the car to put sponsors. Even Ferrari who used to be on top from 1999 to 2007 were insignificant 16 years now both in titles and sponsors (only recently they got HP and never had a good sponsor since Vodafone) and needed Hamilton to be on the spotlight. Things change and evolve and you should not take things for granted.
I think you're the one who is overestimating the budget McLaren was working with. Once Honda departed, McLaren were struggling with severe financial issues. They were on the brink of bankruptcy in 202090feet wrote: ↑26 Jan 2025, 01:45You guys are really massively underestimating the kind of budget McLaren had in previous years. They weren't at the top, sure, but they weren't far behind those top teams. The lack of sponsors on the car was a bit misleading; a big part of that decline was because Ron was inflexible about the deals he'd accept and would only sign sponsors who paid like it was 2007. Zak has solved that problem in large part by being willing to accept a lot of smaller deals.-wkst- wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 17:52I can tell you that my arguments were the same as I was younger, but history doesn't pay your bills, as happened to McLaren in 2020. Williams is anyway irrelevant for many, many years now. As McLaren would be result-wise without the cap.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 16:40Henri I don't want to sound disrespectful but Mclaren as a name is as high as Ferrari. Mercedes and Red Bull are nowhere near Mclaren in terms of history and an F1 name. F1 doesn't exist without Ferrari, Mclaren or Williams while nobody will care if Red Bull or Mercedes leave F1. It was always like this and it will always be like this. These 3 teams are F1. As for sponsors Mercedes who was dominant during 2014 to 2021 are nothing 3 years now and actually lost sponsors. Mclaren who was nothing during 2014 to 2021 and empty of sponsors are now on top and trying to find space in the car to put sponsors. Even Ferrari who used to be on top from 1999 to 2007 were insignificant 16 years now both in titles and sponsors (only recently they got HP and never had a good sponsor since Vodafone) and needed Hamilton to be on the spotlight. Things change and evolve and you should not take things for granted.
Regardless, the idea that McLaren was chronically underfunded and had to be rescued by the budget cap is simply not correct. McLaren's turnaround is a result of putting the right people and the right leadership positions and more efficiently using the resources they had always had at their disposal.
Who is MLP?