

Pics of rear upright seem to pretty much confirm separate fwd and aft links on upper “wishbone”, as detailed here:SilviuAgo wrote: ↑17 Apr 2025, 20:28More pics tks to Autoracer.it
https://autoracer.it/wp-content/uploads ... x1364.webp
https://autoracer.it/wp-content/uploads ... x1364.webp
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/19128195 ... me=900x900
Yes, true, also in Bahrain test days they tried this RW configuration, and in Melbourne only on Lando's car, in FP1 just to revert on FP2 to the RW config used for the rest of the weekend. As you said, influenced by the incoming weather.
Would that reduce "scrub" under full-ish compression aero load situation ?ing. wrote: ↑18 Apr 2025, 06:00Pics of rear upright seem to pretty much confirm separate fwd and aft links on upper “wishbone”, as detailed here:SilviuAgo wrote: ↑17 Apr 2025, 20:28More pics tks to Autoracer.it
https://autoracer.it/wp-content/uploads ... x1364.webp
https://autoracer.it/wp-content/uploads ... x1364.webp
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/19128195 ... me=900x900
https://x.com/engdesigning/status/19086 ... 5rN71eTA2g
Although this could be used to create a more outboard “virtual” upper pivot, or joint, I don’t expect this will change either camber gain or scrub characteristics. The latter are mostly influenced by roll center (or instant center) height and wishbone effective lengths.Farnborough wrote: ↑18 Apr 2025, 09:14Would that reduce "scrub" under full-ish compression aero load situation ?ing. wrote: ↑18 Apr 2025, 06:00Pics of rear upright seem to pretty much confirm separate fwd and aft links on upper “wishbone”, as detailed here:SilviuAgo wrote: ↑17 Apr 2025, 20:28More pics tks to Autoracer.it
https://autoracer.it/wp-content/uploads ... x1364.webp
https://autoracer.it/wp-content/uploads ... x1364.webp
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/19128195 ... me=900x900
https://x.com/engdesigning/status/19086 ... 5rN71eTA2g
Thank you for the explanation and thought on this.ing. wrote: ↑18 Apr 2025, 13:29Although this could be used to create a more outboard “virtual” upper pivot, or joint, I don’t expect this will change either camber gain or scrub characteristics. The latter are mostly influenced by roll center (or instant center) height and wishbone effective lengths.Farnborough wrote: ↑18 Apr 2025, 09:14Would that reduce "scrub" under full-ish compression aero load situation ?ing. wrote: ↑18 Apr 2025, 06:00
Pics of rear upright seem to pretty much confirm separate fwd and aft links on upper “wishbone”, as detailed here:
https://x.com/engdesigning/status/19086 ... 5rN71eTA2g
I expect they used the separate link design to accommodate the somewhat extreme divergent angles of the fwd and aft arms.
On the front suspension—with steering involved—the virtual joint (lower in this case) may be useful in reducing steering loads and kickback:
An artificial post-edit by someone, highlighting the shapes.
Also I just noticed, this is not from this year. The marshall’s shirt says MiamiSilent Storm wrote: ↑20 Apr 2025, 21:00Mclaren floor
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Go_91NUWMAA ... name=large
Good catch, I was so excited to see that Mclaren floor that I missed the background.Emag wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025, 15:34Also I just noticed, this is not from this year. The marshall’s shirt says MiamiSilent Storm wrote: ↑20 Apr 2025, 21:00Mclaren floor
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Go_91NUWMAA ... name=large![]()