Proper analysis from you, Vanja !
Personally I really care more about the fact the RBR could well follow the McL, but I agree with the issue of the FIA inconsistency and dumb/blunt reasoning.
right of review is pointless for clearing what is allowed and what not because before getting to that point of merit, you need to show new evidence for the case, which is always a fail for the requester
"We were surprised, but positively surprised," Marko said afterwards in the paddock of Jeddah about the race pace. "Compared to Bahrain, we have made a lot of progress, although this circuit also suits us better. Here you have a lot more fast corners and different asphalt, which helped us," Marko acknowledges
"We are making steps and trying to make the car more predictable. We are also working on giving the car a larger window." "We are taking small steps. "I think we should be in a position around Imola where we have the speed to beat the McLarens," Marko said quite optimistically
Finally, some optimism, the upgrades looked like they worked which is hopefully giving the team more confidence that the step by step updates in MIA and IMO are going to work too."Well, fortunately the race is not around lunch and normally the sun goes down. We have to see how it goes there and if we can find more performance, but I normally think we can be competitive there as well."
Also, this quote from Horner was interesting, it was just 1 track in JED but the correlation/setup was good for the 1st time in a long time, the team wasn't lost in FP1 and FP2.Horner has already explained that Red Bull did not know how to find that in Bahrain, making the picture look particularly bad, and that the optimal window prior to qualifying in Jeddah has been found for that circuit.
Amazing analysis that completely destroys all the rubbish being said about this. Get ready for Verstappen to do this consistently now, can't wait to hear the reasoning if they then punish him.langedweil wrote: ↑22 Apr 2025, 03:50Proper analysis from you, Vanja !
Personally I really care more about the fact the RBR could well follow the McL, but I agree with the issue of the FIA inconsistency and dumb/blunt reasoning.
https://twitter.com/aerotechvh/status/1 ... 00AXBCFwjw
I am really unsure. There just was no use for a gap at the end so Piastry might have just played it smart and took no risk. Even Vestappen conceded some of his gap at certain races previous years.
Piastri got held up by the back runners based on what he said on his broadcasted radio (didn't check his onboard), then the gap dropped from high 4s to low 3sHenk_v wrote: ↑22 Apr 2025, 12:34I am really unsure. There just was no use for a gap at the end so Piastry might have just played it smart and took no risk. Even Vestappen conceded some of his gap at certain races previous years.
There is just little point in wallhugging or curb smashing with aging tyres when the win is obvious. Georges tyres fell of a cliff and even desintegrated. Piastry may have just played it safe. Destroying your tires with 2 Laps to go is a sore loss.
I have to change my stance from Max was wrong to Max was robbed I guessRikhart wrote: ↑22 Apr 2025, 11:53Amazing analysis that completely destroys all the rubbish being said about this. Get ready for Verstappen to do this consistently now, can't wait to hear the reasoning if they then punish him.langedweil wrote: ↑22 Apr 2025, 03:50Proper analysis from you, Vanja !
Personally I really care more about the fact the RBR could well follow the McL, but I agree with the issue of the FIA inconsistency and dumb/blunt reasoning.
https://twitter.com/aerotechvh/status/1 ... 00AXBCFwjw
14 points if you consider Oscar as his main rival, which seems very likely at this point.
Yeah good catch. It was a 14 point swing.