Some thoughts from AR.
https://autoracer.it/it/analisi-miami-q ... i-mercedes
The U.S. trip witnessed the worst Ferrari of the season, rivaling only Saturday in Melbourne. Adjustments made by the engineers shifted the balance more towards the front, showing improvement in fast corners and traction compared to the Sprint Shootout lap. Yet this wasn't enough, with a half-second gap from pole position—potentially seven-tenths if Norris had assembled a clean lap. The SF-25 lacks aerodynamic downforce, with balance deficiencies causing huge losses in slow sections—a well-known issue this weekend in Miami. Raising the car compared to the Sprint caused substantial performance losses: a severe judgment in this car generation, where generating downforce across a broad ride-height range is crucial. Additionally, both drivers pushed to the limit, and the car's potential matched the result. Lewis Hamilton exited in Q2, and Charles Leclerc advanced only thanks to a tow in the final sector worth nearly one-tenth (70 milliseconds). Realistically, Ferrari would have had both drivers close and eliminated in Q2, highlighting a very disappointing qualifying.
Intrinsic problems with this project continue to severely limit Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton, especially the SF-25's inability to exploit peak tire performance. Compared to Sprint Qualifying, the gap increased, and Williams slotted in ahead, pushing Leclerc down further, while Hamilton struggled again with the car's lack of feel. Currently, the SF-25 has a weak rear end: a more "neutral" balance in the Sprint led to understeer, prompting a front-biased approach for the weekend’s second half, resulting in oversteer and total rear grip loss—particularly penalizing the seven-time world champion. Drivers are at their limit, delivering seemingly good laps only to find themselves P8 and half a second behind. Urgent corrections, solutions, and upgrades are required. Until then, barring extraordinary situations like the Sprint Race, Ferrari remains a modest car, aiming at the gap between top teams and midfield, unless miracles occur from the drivers. Red Bull's example shows improvements can happen quickly with sensitive cars, but updates are essential to salvage an otherwise highly insufficient and unacceptable season given the significant Constructors' Championship deficit.
Xyz22 wrote: ↑04 May 2025, 02:32
That was a mistake by the translators. Vasseur said they are expecting a big shower tomorrow, not that they are hoping for rain.
In any event, his other statements don't make any sense.
Thank you for the clarification, I didn't realize it was a mistranslation. That makes a lot more sense.
Seems like it will rain and maybe even thunder, so wish or not we're getting it.