AR3-GP wrote: ↑06 May 2025, 00:16
Attemping to copy someone is always a route one can take, but Mercedes has been chasing these regulations in general for the last 4 years. So we don't know how long it will take or if they will even be successful in replicating the brake cooling scheme that Mclaren is doing. I simply think Toto was more useful in his old form. Of course I also criticized him then (lol), but that was for different reasons. Herr Wolff and his bite was an asset to the silver team. He singlehandedly broke Ferrari mid-2022 and they have never really recovered from it. That's the Toto Wolff that Mercedes needs today.
I mean he wanted a uniform solution to the porpoising. That wasn't aimed at Ferrari. Of course he also had the hope any directive would help Mercedes. As intrinsically, they were screwed.
And I completely disagree with Toto being different presently or Merc purportedly needing "the old" one. You look over at Ferrari and the same nonsense surrounding that team has now been banished from Merc.
We were led to believe Toto was asleep at the wheel then, too.
The porpoising phenomena is one of the most complicated to replicate and in no way a direct comparison to a brake cooling innovation. They're 2 very different things that do not stand up to equivalent comparison.
We had the Red Bull team boss make an absolute clown of himself with water in tyres, and a host of other sour comments that had no impact at all. Like Brown said, if you don't like it protest why it's illegal.
Merc are doing the flexiwing stuff (as evidently are Red Bull from Miami videos) so that would leave the brake cooling system as something Toto could whine about. But, why would he if he can't say it's illegal? That's just Horner levels of cope. As I recall, for each issue Toto had evidence of either illegality or a single time with safety concerns for the driver (porpoising).
On what grounds do you want a completely different Toto, to lodge protests about something he can't prove?