I can't tell if this is implying it'll be earlier or later than Silverstone...
From the writing he seems to just be tempering that Ferrari won’t be 1s/lap faster in silverstone just because of the suspension, and/or that there’s no firm date for it.ScuderiaLeo wrote:I can't tell if this is implying it'll be earlier or later than Silverstone...
Are they doing a stream tonight? I assume they'll drop a new article early next week?ScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 19:41I can't tell if this is implying it'll be earlier or later than Silverstone...
Yea, reading it, it sounds like the same news as before, floor in Canada or Austria, suspension in silverstone but dont expect ferrari to suddenly be at mclaren's leveldialtone wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 19:44From the writing he seems to just be tempering that Ferrari won’t be 1s/lap faster in silverstone just because of the suspension, and/or that there’s no firm date for it.ScuderiaLeo wrote:I can't tell if this is implying it'll be earlier or later than Silverstone...
Quite the contrary. I did not say he is inferior.El_KaPpa wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 18:50It’s always curious how the so-called balanced takes start with “I’m a fan, but...” and then go on to describe the driver as outdated, instinctively inferior and basically past it. Sounds less like fandom and more like an excuse to downgrade a 7-time world champion under the cover of objectivity.ringo wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 18:18Fred himself said there was something wrong.Space-heat wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 15:45
More likely is that Lewis complained about a loose rear or lack of front grip during an early stint, and the team adjusted his FW in the pit stop. I want Lewis to succeed as much as anyone, but can we accept the adjustment is going to be longer than we all hoped? Unless Fred says they messed up the settings then it's all hearsay. AR reported there were no issues with Charles' or Lewis' car.
I have seen a lot of people say that Lewis' driving style doesn't suit the GE cars. I dunno if this is another one of those "the car is designed around x driver" myths or it might be age catching up, but hopefully with the rules reset next year, he can find a better pace.
He wont say what it is. They made changes to relieve something but probably didnt ask how much to change.
I think they assume Lewis doesn't know the car so they know how much clicks to put in anyway so why ask. That didn't work out.
The other issue is possibly floor damage.
I think generally Lewis is outdated in terms of driving technique. I say that as a fan.
The same goes for Alonso and Hulk.
Lewis will do well once the car's rear is planted and be unbeatable. The problem is when the rear is not planted. The younger drivers do not need to drive as much on feeling or feedback. They can push and throw the car more with less hesitation because theyre likely not waiting for a feedback. That's my observation. The stiffer platform and the low profile tyre just requires a technique that Hamilton does not possess by instinct. When you are not driving by instinct you are going to lose some milliseconds per corner.
In the grand scheme Lewis' problem is noticable but very minor given the circumstances.
His points gap to Charles is norrowest teammate gap on the grid second only to Oscar and Lando; both in the same car for over 2 years. I have not checked it, but i suspect Carlos was not this close on points at race 9 either. Even worse when he just joined Ferrari.
Charles was not this close to Vettel at race 9 when he just joined etc.
So Lewis is not doing bad. Doing a decent job. But there is a lot of noise, and he is judged unfairly because of the attention he brings, the media pundits who are envious, and generally fans waiting decades for some kind of downfall or unravelling.
He wont improve in this generation's car. Only if it drives at the limit where the feeling does not fluctuate as much so he doesnt have guess what's going to happen.
I don't know why his 2023 was so good. Or if it was that George was having a bad year.
If Lewis is truly struggling, it’s in a car not designed around him, with limited input so far and still the gap to Leclerc is minimal. That says more about Hamilton’s level than any theory about instinct or generational driving styles.
McLaren’s level is simply not attainable this year, but regardless they just need to get the car within a tenth and let the drivers work out the rest, but not sure if they can even do that.Luscion wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 20:24Yea, reading it, it sounds like the same news as before, floor in Canada or Austria, suspension in silverstone but dont expect ferrari to suddenly be at mclaren's leveldialtone wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 19:44From the writing he seems to just be tempering that Ferrari won’t be 1s/lap faster in silverstone just because of the suspension, and/or that there’s no firm date for it.ScuderiaLeo wrote:
I can't tell if this is implying it'll be earlier or later than Silverstone...
It is breathtaking to see you complain about a perceived lack of objectivity from other posters, after that extremely subjective, baseless post you made a page or two back.El_KaPpa wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 18:50It’s always curious how the so-called balanced takes start with “I’m a fan, but...” and then go on to describe the driver as outdated, instinctively inferior and basically past it. Sounds less like fandom and more like an excuse to downgrade a 7-time world champion under the cover of objectivity.ringo wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 18:18Fred himself said there was something wrong.Space-heat wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 15:45
More likely is that Lewis complained about a loose rear or lack of front grip during an early stint, and the team adjusted his FW in the pit stop. I want Lewis to succeed as much as anyone, but can we accept the adjustment is going to be longer than we all hoped? Unless Fred says they messed up the settings then it's all hearsay. AR reported there were no issues with Charles' or Lewis' car.
I have seen a lot of people say that Lewis' driving style doesn't suit the GE cars. I dunno if this is another one of those "the car is designed around x driver" myths or it might be age catching up, but hopefully with the rules reset next year, he can find a better pace.
He wont say what it is. They made changes to relieve something but probably didnt ask how much to change.
I think they assume Lewis doesn't know the car so they know how much clicks to put in anyway so why ask. That didn't work out.
The other issue is possibly floor damage.
I think generally Lewis is outdated in terms of driving technique. I say that as a fan.
The same goes for Alonso and Hulk.
Lewis will do well once the car's rear is planted and be unbeatable. The problem is when the rear is not planted. The younger drivers do not need to drive as much on feeling or feedback. They can push and throw the car more with less hesitation because theyre likely not waiting for a feedback. That's my observation. The stiffer platform and the low profile tyre just requires a technique that Hamilton does not possess by instinct. When you are not driving by instinct you are going to lose some milliseconds per corner.
In the grand scheme Lewis' problem is noticable but very minor given the circumstances.
His points gap to Charles is norrowest teammate gap on the grid second only to Oscar and Lando; both in the same car for over 2 years. I have not checked it, but i suspect Carlos was not this close on points at race 9 either. Even worse when he just joined Ferrari.
Charles was not this close to Vettel at race 9 when he just joined etc.
So Lewis is not doing bad. Doing a decent job. But there is a lot of noise, and he is judged unfairly because of the attention he brings, the media pundits who are envious, and generally fans waiting decades for some kind of downfall or unravelling.
He wont improve in this generation's car. Only if it drives at the limit where the feeling does not fluctuate as much so he doesnt have guess what's going to happen.
I don't know why his 2023 was so good. Or if it was that George was having a bad year.
If Lewis is truly struggling, it’s in a car not designed around him, with limited input so far and still the gap to Leclerc is minimal. That says more about Hamilton’s level than any theory about instinct or generational driving styles.
… why aren’t Ferrari putting more focus on him [Hamilton] instead? And I’m not saying Leclerc is a bad driver, he’s fast.. for sure, but if they keep developing the car with his preferences in mind, they’ll just keep getting the same outcome.. no real title shot. If Leclerc is truly as adaptable as people claim then he should be able to adjust.
Because it's completely inconceivable that somebody could be a fan of somebody while also being objective and acknowledging they are simply not as good as they used to be?El_KaPpa wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 18:50It’s always curious how the so-called balanced takes start with “I’m a fan, but...” and then go on to describe the driver as outdated, instinctively inferior and basically past it. Sounds less like fandom and more like an excuse to downgrade a 7-time world champion under the cover of objectivity.
If Lewis is truly struggling, it’s in a car not designed around him, with limited input so far and still the gap to Leclerc is minimal. That says more about Hamilton’s level than any theory about instinct or generational driving styles.
Fair enough. I’ll leave it at that.catent wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 23:14It is breathtaking to see you complain about a perceived lack of objectivity from other posters, after that extremely subjective, baseless post you made a page or two back.El_KaPpa wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 18:50It’s always curious how the so-called balanced takes start with “I’m a fan, but...” and then go on to describe the driver as outdated, instinctively inferior and basically past it. Sounds less like fandom and more like an excuse to downgrade a 7-time world champion under the cover of objectivity.ringo wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025, 18:18
Fred himself said there was something wrong.
He wont say what it is. They made changes to relieve something but probably didnt ask how much to change.
I think they assume Lewis doesn't know the car so they know how much clicks to put in anyway so why ask. That didn't work out.
The other issue is possibly floor damage.
I think generally Lewis is outdated in terms of driving technique. I say that as a fan.
The same goes for Alonso and Hulk.
Lewis will do well once the car's rear is planted and be unbeatable. The problem is when the rear is not planted. The younger drivers do not need to drive as much on feeling or feedback. They can push and throw the car more with less hesitation because theyre likely not waiting for a feedback. That's my observation. The stiffer platform and the low profile tyre just requires a technique that Hamilton does not possess by instinct. When you are not driving by instinct you are going to lose some milliseconds per corner.
In the grand scheme Lewis' problem is noticable but very minor given the circumstances.
His points gap to Charles is norrowest teammate gap on the grid second only to Oscar and Lando; both in the same car for over 2 years. I have not checked it, but i suspect Carlos was not this close on points at race 9 either. Even worse when he just joined Ferrari.
Charles was not this close to Vettel at race 9 when he just joined etc.
So Lewis is not doing bad. Doing a decent job. But there is a lot of noise, and he is judged unfairly because of the attention he brings, the media pundits who are envious, and generally fans waiting decades for some kind of downfall or unravelling.
He wont improve in this generation's car. Only if it drives at the limit where the feeling does not fluctuate as much so he doesnt have guess what's going to happen.
I don't know why his 2023 was so good. Or if it was that George was having a bad year.
If Lewis is truly struggling, it’s in a car not designed around him, with limited input so far and still the gap to Leclerc is minimal. That says more about Hamilton’s level than any theory about instinct or generational driving styles.
… why aren’t Ferrari putting more focus on him [Hamilton] instead? And I’m not saying Leclerc is a bad driver, he’s fast.. for sure, but if they keep developing the car with his preferences in mind, they’ll just keep getting the same outcome.. no real title shot. If Leclerc is truly as adaptable as people claim then he should be able to adjust.
T2 will be the SF25 biggest issue, if they can minimize the time lost to the other top 3, we will go well.Farnborough wrote: ↑06 Jun 2025, 11:41The attributes in mechanical setup this chassis is currently "levelled" at will be useful at Canada circuit to likely make a more rounded performance from them.
Staccato track radius generally, shorter corners, less time at peak lateral, curb "acceptance" all should suit this current iteration.
Accepting their acknowledged limitations in mechanical, if observed and built towards, rather than trying to make it do what it really doesn't accept because of those limitations, the way to maximise for both driver performance.
Ahead of the Canadian Grand Prix, where Ferrari is planning on introducing a new floor and rear suspension, the team doesn’t want to keep its hopes up. Even in Maranello, the SF-25 is branded a ‘bad car’, and the next updates are expected to improve the situation without actually turning it around.