I guess you were rooting for Oscar to win, because McLaren ended with a 1-2 still, no reason to celebrate, right?Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 19:36And that is why I believe there is bias. Russell escaped with it. Max does it all the time and escapes with it. I want to see consistency. Here we have another easy 1-2 and instead of celebrating we are sour because of their inconsistent stewarding.
Ground Effect wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 19:46I guess you were rooting for Oscar to win, because McLaren ended with a 1-2 still, no reason not to celebrate, right?Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 19:36And that is why I believe there is bias. Russell escaped with it. Max does it all the time and escapes with it. I want to see consistency. Here we have another easy 1-2 and instead of celebrating we are sour because of their inconsistent stewarding.
Russell's was half the amount on psi. Russell's was with the safety car still running. Russell's wasn't in wet conditions.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 19:36And that is why I believe there is bias. Russell escaped with it. Max does it all the time and escapes with it. I want to see consistency. Here we have another easy 1-2 and instead of celebrating we are sour because of their inconsistent stewarding.
It is a reason to celebrate but decisions from stewards who have had no basic knowledge of the safety cars rules in the past that decide an outcome of a race always leave a sour taste. I as a person when I feel a driver has been wrongfully accused will always mention it.Ground Effect wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 19:46I guess you were rooting for Oscar to win, because McLaren ended with a 1-2 still, no reason to celebrate, right?Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 19:36And that is why I believe there is bias. Russell escaped with it. Max does it all the time and escapes with it. I want to see consistency. Here we have another easy 1-2 and instead of celebrating we are sour because of their inconsistent stewarding.
He broke a rule, entirely different scenario to George/Max @ Canada, we very nearly ended up with a Mugello 2020 again because of it, he's lucky Verstappen had no pace in the conditions to keep a P2, could have easily been a P3Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 19:58It is a reason to celebrate but decisions from stewards who have had no basic knowledge of the safety cars rules in the past that decide an outcome of a race always leave a sour taste.Ground Effect wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 19:46I guess you were rooting for Oscar to win, because McLaren ended with a 1-2 still, no reason to celebrate, right?Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 19:36And that is why I believe there is bias. Russell escaped with it. Max does it all the time and escapes with it. I want to see consistency. Here we have another easy 1-2 and instead of celebrating we are sour because of their inconsistent stewarding.
oh my, the long wait....
Haha don’t waste your time mate, he doesn’t look at facts and just thinks everything and everyone is anti McLarenBen1980 wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 19:46Russell's was half the amount on psi. Russell's was with the safety car still running. Russell's wasn't in wet conditions.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 19:36And that is why I believe there is bias. Russell escaped with it. Max does it all the time and escapes with it. I want to see consistency. Here we have another easy 1-2 and instead of celebrating we are sour because of their inconsistent stewarding.
Over than that, exactly the same.
Lando deserved the penalty in Qatar but the magnitude was ridiculous. Possibly the same here. Wouldn't have impacted the final result much though I don't thinkBen1980 wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 21:41Im a team fan, obviously, I sway Norris again, that's clear.
But if Lando does the same as Oscar, its a penalty. I dont think this is a Red Bull thing at all . I think I saw that in previous laps, Oscar went to 130kph appx. Then this time 60kph. In that weather, with the visibility it was just a daft move.
Penalty was fair. Same as Lando in Qatar.