Bro needs to get out of his own head and keep it clean in Q3 and the win is his
Just pointing out obvious reality. Only people denying it are you guys.Balalu wrote: ↑30 Jul 2025, 13:28Salty Ferrari fan ^Seanspeed wrote: ↑30 Jul 2025, 00:31Miami occurred well before halfway into the season. Meaning the Mclaren was the clear best car for the vast majority of the season.mwillems wrote: ↑28 Jul 2025, 05:21
Your reality lol
The car was not the best car over the season, but since Miami. It was too much to close the gap. But it should have been much closer. Outside of some on Reddit and some certain threads in here, this appears to be the concesus.
Anyway, that was last year.
Nobody agrees with you except sad Mclaren and Norris fans who dont want to accept reality.
LOL WUT. I'm as pro McLaren as it gets but it's ludicrous to claim Massa didn't do a good job in 2008Seanspeed wrote: ↑02 Aug 2025, 00:41
Just pointing out obvious reality. Only people denying it are you guys.
I'm not incapable of being objective just cuz I'm a Ferrari fan. I totally recognize that we lost the 2008 and 2018 F1 titles cuz our drivers weren't good enough, for instance(though I'd say in 2018, it wasn't that Ferrari had the best car, more just that it was competitive enough to win the title if one of our drivers had a good enough season).
There's nothing ludicrous about suggesting that Felipe Massa was in a whole lower class of driver compared to somebody like Lewis Hamilton. Which was proven out quite well when Massa was annihilated by Fernando Alonso.Macklaren wrote: ↑02 Aug 2025, 01:13LOL WUT. I'm as pro McLaren as it gets but it's ludicrous to claim Massa didn't do a good job in 2008Seanspeed wrote: ↑02 Aug 2025, 00:41
Just pointing out obvious reality. Only people denying it are you guys.
I'm not incapable of being objective just cuz I'm a Ferrari fan. I totally recognize that we lost the 2008 and 2018 F1 titles cuz our drivers weren't good enough, for instance(though I'd say in 2018, it wasn't that Ferrari had the best car, more just that it was competitive enough to win the title if one of our drivers had a good enough season).
No info on that for the moment. I recon Stella saying if the drivers will keep this approach to have different suspensions, this may be a logistic headache for Mclaren in the second part of the season (considering also the spare parts needed for each GP).
If it helps Norris and has no impact on Piastri then I see no reason not to force him to use it.Waz wrote: ↑02 Aug 2025, 11:28A logistic headache they created by bringing a new front suspension that was designed to accommodate 1 driver's preferences.
It's not a performance upgrade in any way except allowing Norris to be more comfortable in the car.
If Piastri doesn't think it's better, I highly doubt Webber will be letting McLaren force him on to it
I don’t think he ever ran it in practise.
The car has improved a little more relative to our competitors. But also Lando is making less mistakes in Q.BMMR61 wrote: ↑02 Aug 2025, 13:43Dominance of McLaren just seems to get baked in more as the season progresses. They really have a handle on this car, only exception was Canada. They looked so strong again in FP3, Max doesn't look like a threat for qualifying, Charles best of the rest. Not too worried whether Oscar has the new front suspension tbh.
As they should in a prototype series. Don't see the logistics problem tbh anyway. Both drivers usually keep out of trouble, so needing new parts for broken suspensions isn't going to be a problem.