Emag wrote: ↑23 Aug 2025, 14:39Its funny, coming from Fallows, whose team failed to develop the AMR23 so badly they actually regressed with each upgrade.mwillems wrote: ↑19 Aug 2025, 17:26All hes saying is there's plenty of time left on the table. Considering the concensus was that we are very much into diminishing returns, it was an interesting statement, suggesting that there is a considerable chunk yet to find.
It was the start of last year when some suggested the development curve would flatten noticeably. It does seem like that wasn't the case.
None the less, the median improvement from 2024 to 2025 pole laps is close to half a second – and it’s even greater if you isolate McLaren’s performance. So the time is clearly there, and Fallows’ comment that if McLaren “stood still” they could be at the back of the grid after two more years of development is absolutely true. The hidden point, though, is that while the time exists in this formula, you also need the capability to extract it
.
What Fallows was really saying is that there’s much more lap time still available in this Formula, and he’s right. His hypothetical scenario wasn’t meant to reflect reality in a literal sense, but to underline how the field will continue to unlock performance if the rules are left unchanged.
However, he probably isn't the best spokesperson right now
