FOM/CVC take a windfall from credit crunch crisis

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

FOM/CVC take a windfall from credit crunch crisis

Post

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/busin ... 08832.html
F1 on profit lap as Libor falls
By Christian Sylt and Caroline Reid
Sunday, 25 October 2009
The commercial rights holder of Formula One motor racing, which is majority-owned by private equity firm CVC, has benefited from the downturn as falling interest rates allowed it to reduce its debt last year.

Accounts to 31 December 2008 for Delta 3, F1's London-based holding company, showed a 13 per cent rise in turnover to $1bn (£600m) due to an increase in race hosting fees.

CVC borrowed $2.8bn from RBS and Lehman Brothers to buy F1 in 2006 and over the past year there were fears that it could default due to an increase in prize money from $342m in 2007 to $521m, causing the operating profit to plummet 58 per cent to $86.4m.

However, the debt repayment accelerated as the loan is pegged to the London inter bank lending rate (Libor) which crashed last year. This led to interest charges being 26 per cent lower than in 2007. Delta 3 also repaid $83.7m of the principal and restructured its lending. "We expect to pay off $1bn over the next five years," said Nick Clarry, CVC's UK managing director.
By 2014 when the bond expires the debt will be down to 0.8 billion. If CVC sells at this point and the next owner pays a price according to the last valuation CVC will pocket 2 billion from their venture. Not exactly small change. Hopefully the FIA will do something to reduce the valuation and make it less attractive to venture capitalists to get into the game. The relentless squeezing of money out of race venues that are bankrupting themselves and pushing ticket prices through the roof is disgusting. The ultimate owner, the FIA has a responsibility to adress this together with the FOTA.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

Reventon
Reventon
0
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 13:25

Re: FOM/CVC take a windfall from credit crunch crisis

Post

CVC borrowed $2.8bn from RBS and Lehman Brothers to buy F1 in 2006
who did they buy it FROM ? who pocketed the $2.8 billion ??

User avatar
raceman
0
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 08:57
Location: Pune, India

Re: FOM/CVC take a windfall from credit crunch crisis

Post

Reventon wrote:
CVC borrowed $2.8bn from RBS and Lehman Brothers to buy F1 in 2006
who did they buy it FROM ? who pocketed the $2.8 billion ??
exactly! right question to ask.....

Pup
Pup
50
Joined: 08 May 2008, 17:45

Re: FOM/CVC take a windfall from credit crunch crisis

Post

Really? OK, have a seat.

They consolidated shares from four different sources, three banks and Bernie. I've read that both Bernie and a spinoff from Lehman Bros. still have small stakes.

It all started when Bernie paid a $300 million for the commercial rights long ago. Max gave him a 100 year deal. There were hints that Bernie later gave Max a $250 million gift. Birthday present.

Bernie then sold 50% of his company to two investment companies for $850 million. EMTV bought those shares from the investment companies for $1.1 billion. EMTV went bankrupt and Kirsch Media bought those shares, and another 25% from Bernie for $600 million.

Then Kirsch went belly up. So his creditors - Bayerische, Lehman, and Morgan Stanley - took over their 75%. CVC then came along and bought those shares from the banks, along with Bernie's remaining 25%. The numbers from that purchase vary, but $2.8 or $2.9 billion is what Sylit uses. I've read different things about where that money went. Some say the purchase price was $1.35 billion total, with the rest of the loan used as an early payout to CVC; others say that the $1.35b was just for Beyerische and Morgan Stanley's shares, Bernie's 25% cost another $1b, Bernie's Allsport was another $300m, and then the Lehman stake cost $600m. The latter is what I believe.

By the way, the original $300m loan to buy the commercial rights was never paid by Bernie, so that debt went to CVC also.

I don't buy this latest story from Sylit - in fact there's very little of what he writes that I trust. The problem is that almost everything written about F1 finances is done by him, regardless of where you read it. Probably because he's the only one who cares. It's a confusing mess, and I think Sylit's articles make it all just that much more opaque.

OK, so he has a much longer article about this over on pitpass, and I think the Independent did well to edit most of that down. In fact I think they stopped four paragraphs too soon. In the pitpass article, Sylit is making claims about CVC paying back a large chunk of their debt, and I don't see how that's possible considering that they're running at a loss. At best they've refinanced with lower rates. I do not believe that their current loan is variable, and I certainly don't believe that a loan of that size and risk could be had at libor+2. That's crazy. My suspicion is that Sylit has forgotten that the loan is a PIK loan, and that most of the the payments made last year were in kind - meaning that while they might look like huge paydowns, they are really just swapping interest for debt. If I'm right, then their total debt actually went up last year and not down.

I'm of the opinion that CVC has yet to make a dime on F1. I think they paid way too much, expecting more races, and smaller - not larger - payouts to the teams. There was a time after the purchase that Bernie was saying that the teams would need to take a 50% cut in their payouts. For the good of the sport. That obviously didn't happen.

Either that, or the books are so cooked that we'd never be able to figure out what's really going on. :wink:
Last edited by Pup on 27 Oct 2009, 17:46, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: FOM/CVC take a windfall from credit crunch crisis

Post

F1 was previously owned by the Haffa brothers and Kirch who were heavily endebted as well and went bust. From there the banks owned it until CVC stepped in. Originally Bernie and his family trust owned it but he sold his shares gradually until it was zero in 2005. With the CVC deal he got a small equity share back but I believe it is single digit. So basically the answer is Bernie, Slavica, Petra and Tamara Ecclestone got the money.

Edit: Oh, I see the Pup did a much longer thing on this issue. We seem to agree on some things. Christian Sylt seems to be the best writer I have read so far on the F1 finance scene. Re the Libor+2 you have to consider that Private Equity firms are not rated on single investments but on the total asset, risk and return screening. If their returns are consistently high their beta will save their bacon. So taking some of the money out from the initial finance deal and blowing up the debt was probably a shrewd move.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

Pup
Pup
50
Joined: 08 May 2008, 17:45

Re: FOM/CVC take a windfall from credit crunch crisis

Post

Like him or not, I guess we're stuck with Sylit, since he's our only source of info really.

What turned me off on him were two articles he did a few years back - one on McLaren and the other on Williams. In both articles, he was combining numbers from two completely different years to argue that each team was in a financial pickle.

In the McLaren article, he used income figures from the year they went without a sponsor to show how they couldn't possibly pay off their expenses of the year in which they had the FIA fine. :lol:

He also throws in things like this, from an article last week about how much Merc spends on their engine program...
...the earnings of the highest-paid director, believed to be the division's managing director Sten Ola Kallenius, accelerated 44% to £630,000. Not bad given that his engines have powered McLaren's Lewis Hamilton down from first to sixth place.
So, he's got it out for either Merc or McLaren obviously, but this is the sort of thing that he'll toss into his pitpass article, but which gets edited out of what's published in the Financial Times or elsewhere. So what you get if you read those articles is the bias, but without the over-the-top rhetoric that lets the reader know that he's got an axe to grind.

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: FOM/CVC take a windfall from credit crunch crisis

Post

Pitpass generally are a second rated source. They do not have a permanent travelling reporter IMO. They do take emotional positions towards persons and inject a lot of bias and opinion into their reporting. Sometimes they do get some things right like Lawrence with the Toyota affair, but most times not. Saward's blog has lately developed into an interesting source and even Allan's is better than Balfe. Michael Schmidt's blog is also informative due to his Stuttgard relationship. Haug used to be editor at AMuS when Schmidt was already there.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)