
If someone like Norris is following for so long it's just massive pace difference especially in a track with immense dirty air. Car was just not even second best today. As usual Max did more than the car deserved.
Yeah I mean, Mercedes was better in qualifying and on the softer compounds.wiktor977 wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 15:59third best lol
Relative to McLaren the pace wasn't there on the hards in my opinion. If Lando had qualified ahead, easy win by 10+ seconds.AR3-GP wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:10I think the pace was there in race trim, but hindered by the gamble for softs and the consequences of that. The softs were not good compared to medium, then he had to push the hards on the outlap and was on older tires than those around him. After the stops, he was faster than Russell with older tires. Russell said he was struggling. There were some issues with downshifts and rear locking, but they didn't have any long running in FP2. The humidity makes the engine control more difficult. There was never going to be an overtaking here, so it was decided by qualifying and Mercedes was just too quick yesterday considering the pace that both RUS and ANT showed.
Max was matching Norris (and both faster than Russell) with 8 laps older tires until Max locked up at whatever turn that was. Then the lockup has damaged the tires and compromised the pace. I didn't see anything too bad here and this is not a preferred circuit of the RB21.f1isgood wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:12Relative to McLaren the pace wasn't there on the hards in my opinion. If Lando had qualified ahead, easy win by 10+ seconds.AR3-GP wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:10I think the pace was there in race trim, but hindered by the gamble for softs and the consequences of that. The softs were not good compared to medium, then he had to push the hards on the outlap and was on older tires than those around him. After the stops, he was faster than Russell with older tires. Russell said he was struggling. There were some issues with downshifts and rear locking, but they didn't have any long running in FP2. The humidity makes the engine control more difficult. There was never going to be an overtaking here, so it was decided by qualifying and Mercedes was just too quick yesterday considering the pace that both RUS and ANT showed.
I agree the lockup cost Max a bit but I'm not entirely sure if it cost him so much pace to basically allow Lando to be in his DRS for so many laps especially with dirty air not clearing up in these walled tracks. I think McLaren would have been extremely quick in clean air but yeah the lock up is indeed a very good point that potentially cost Max some solid pace.AR3-GP wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:14Max was matching Norris with 8 laps older tires until Max locked up at whatever turn that was. Then the lockup has damaged the tires and compromised the pace. I didn't see anything too bad here and this is not a preferred circuit of the RB21.f1isgood wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:12Relative to McLaren the pace wasn't there on the hards in my opinion. If Lando had qualified ahead, easy win by 10+ seconds.AR3-GP wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:10I think the pace was there in race trim, but hindered by the gamble for softs and the consequences of that. The softs were not good compared to medium, then he had to push the hards on the outlap and was on older tires than those around him. After the stops, he was faster than Russell with older tires. Russell said he was struggling. There were some issues with downshifts and rear locking, but they didn't have any long running in FP2. The humidity makes the engine control more difficult. There was never going to be an overtaking here, so it was decided by qualifying and Mercedes was just too quick yesterday considering the pace that both RUS and ANT showed.
Max was on 7 laps older tires that had a hard outlap and flat spot on them. Mclaren was fast but Max was right there or just a tenth behind in ideal conditions (tires of same age, not flat spot). It's not anything like the 1+ second a lap drubbing from last year. It doesn't matter anyway. This is a Mclaren circuit and Max finished in front. Mclaren's theoretical pace didn't earn them anything.f1isgood wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:17I agree the lockup cost Max a bit but I'm not entirely sure if it cost him so much pace to basically allow Lando to be in his DRS for so many laps especially with dirty air not clearing up in these walled tracks. I think McLaren would have been extremely quick in clean air but yeah the lock up is indeed a very good point that potentially cost Max some solid pace.
Lando hounding Max within a second for 20 laps tells me something different. That was more than just sub-optimal tyres. The McLaren still has the race pace advantage due to their incredibly low deg.AR3-GP wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:18Max was on 7 laps older tires, that had a hard outlap and flat spot on them. Mclaren was fast (faster than Mercedes imo) but Red Bull was right there or just a tenth behind. Not anything like the 1+ second a lap drubbing from last year. It doesn't matter anyway. This is a Mclaren circuit and they finished in front. Mclaren's theoretical pace didn't earn them anything.f1isgood wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:17I agree the lockup cost Max a bit but I'm not entirely sure if it cost him so much pace to basically allow Lando to be in his DRS for so many laps especially with dirty air not clearing up in these walled tracks. I think McLaren would have been extremely quick in clean air but yeah the lock up is indeed a very good point that potentially cost Max some solid pace.