redbull have never been quick in a street track were downforce is king ,look at Hungary they is nothing new thereBadger wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:23Lando hounding Max within a second for 20 laps tells me something different. That was more than just sub-optimal tyres. The McLaren still has the race pace advantage due to their incredibly low deg.AR3-GP wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:18Max was on 7 laps older tires, that had a hard outlap and flat spot on them. Mclaren was fast (faster than Mercedes imo) but Red Bull was right there or just a tenth behind. Not anything like the 1+ second a lap drubbing from last year. It doesn't matter anyway. This is a Mclaren circuit and they finished in front. Mclaren's theoretical pace didn't earn them anything.f1isgood wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:17
I agree the lockup cost Max a bit but I'm not entirely sure if it cost him so much pace to basically allow Lando to be in his DRS for so many laps especially with dirty air not clearing up in these walled tracks. I think McLaren would have been extremely quick in clean air but yeah the lock up is indeed a very good point that potentially cost Max some solid pace.
Yes I think Mclaren still have a deg advantage. We saw that in Monza, but Singapore is a Mclaren track. The coming tracks are more suited to the RB21. The corner speeds are faster and we get something like Monza where Max is quick enough to compensate for the additional tire deg over the stint.Badger wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:23Lando hounding Max within a second for 20 laps tells me something different. That was more than just sub-optimal tyres. The McLaren still has the race pace advantage due to their incredibly low deg.AR3-GP wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:18Max was on 7 laps older tires, that had a hard outlap and flat spot on them. Mclaren was fast (faster than Mercedes imo) but Red Bull was right there or just a tenth behind. Not anything like the 1+ second a lap drubbing from last year. It doesn't matter anyway. This is a Mclaren circuit and they finished in front. Mclaren's theoretical pace didn't earn them anything.f1isgood wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:17
I agree the lockup cost Max a bit but I'm not entirely sure if it cost him so much pace to basically allow Lando to be in his DRS for so many laps especially with dirty air not clearing up in these walled tracks. I think McLaren would have been extremely quick in clean air but yeah the lock up is indeed a very good point that potentially cost Max some solid pace.
Singapore represents the worst-case scenario for tyre degradation — slow corners, minimal airflow, intense heat, high humidity, and constant traction demands. That’s why McLaren enjoyed a race pace advantage there: their car manages tyre temperatures better than anyone else. But at circuits like COTA, where overheating is far less of a factor, that strength won’t translate as much. Red Bull, meanwhile, no longer shows any clear weaknesses — the RB21 is now at least as strong as the McLaren in both slow and fast corners.Badger wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:23Lando hounding Max within a second for 20 laps tells me something different. That was more than just sub-optimal tyres. The McLaren still has the race pace advantage due to their incredibly low deg.AR3-GP wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:18Max was on 7 laps older tires, that had a hard outlap and flat spot on them. Mclaren was fast (faster than Mercedes imo) but Red Bull was right there or just a tenth behind. Not anything like the 1+ second a lap drubbing from last year. It doesn't matter anyway. This is a Mclaren circuit and they finished in front. Mclaren's theoretical pace didn't earn them anything.f1isgood wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:17
I agree the lockup cost Max a bit but I'm not entirely sure if it cost him so much pace to basically allow Lando to be in his DRS for so many laps especially with dirty air not clearing up in these walled tracks. I think McLaren would have been extremely quick in clean air but yeah the lock up is indeed a very good point that potentially cost Max some solid pace.
that's quite a big need to be a "just need"pantherxxx wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:18I still believe Verstappen can win the championship. He just needs to win the remaining races, while Russell and Norris consistently take points off Piastri — then it’s definitely possible. Singapore was probably Red Bull’s weakest track, since the circuit’s endless corners don’t allow the tires to cool properly, leading to overheating. That gave McLaren a clear race-pace advantage, but the upcoming tracks should suit Red Bull much better.
Mexico is like Baku without bumps. Long straights and slow or 90 degree corners with 1 high speed "esses" section. Given what Red Bull have shown, it should suit them.Badger wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:37I agree that COTA is better, but it’s not all good. The McLaren loves long radius corners where they can use their mid corner strength. COTA has a lot more of those than Singapore. They will be very strong there too, and likely faster towards the end of stints. Max will need to lead early and control from the front, preferably with a buffer to the McLarens.
The track I have the least hope for is Mexico. Another deg track where RB will be struggling relative to McLaren in the race.
Except it has peak wings, meaning the car balance will be unfavourable for RB who like running smaller wings for front-rear balance. It’s also higher deg.AR3-GP wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:39Mexico is like Baku without bumps. Long straights and slow or 90 degree corners with 1 high speed "esses" section. Given what Red Bull have shown, it should suit them.Badger wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:37I agree that COTA is better, but it’s not all good. The McLaren loves long radius corners where they can use their mid corner strength. COTA has a lot more of those than Singapore. They will be very strong there too, and likely faster towards the end of stints. Max will need to lead early and control from the front, preferably with a buffer to the McLarens.
The track I have the least hope for is Mexico. Another deg track where RB will be struggling relative to McLaren in the race.
Mexico is at high altitude. Less air density. That means the cars actually only generate Monza levels of downforce, despite the big wings. That’s the reason that cars reach 350km/h in Mexico with huge wings.Badger wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:41Except it has peak wings, meaning the car balance will be unfavourable for RB who like running smaller wings for front-rear balance. It’s also higher deg.AR3-GP wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:39Mexico is like Baku without bumps. Long straights and slow or 90 degree corners with 1 high speed "esses" section. Given what Red Bull have shown, it should suit them.Badger wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:37I agree that COTA is better, but it’s not all good. The McLaren loves long radius corners where they can use their mid corner strength. COTA has a lot more of those than Singapore. They will be very strong there too, and likely faster towards the end of stints. Max will need to lead early and control from the front, preferably with a buffer to the McLarens.
The track I have the least hope for is Mexico. Another deg track where RB will be struggling relative to McLaren in the race.
I know, but the balance front to rear will be the same as on a track like Singapore as you bolt on your biggest wings front and rear. On a track like Baku you have a small rear wing and that gives you more scope to add front grip by putting on say a medium front wing. Think about it in terms of front to rear balance instead of downforce generation.AR3-GP wrote: ↑05 Oct 2025, 16:52Mexico is at high altitude. Less air density. That means the cars actually only generate Monza levels of downforce, despite the big wings. That’s the reason that cars reach 350km/h in Mexico with huge wings.