2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
vorticism
vorticism
366
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

Was thinking there must be a clause like that.
vorticism wrote:
19 Nov 2025, 21:46
I guess the long spooling time means they can’t use the K to speed up the engine while it’s declutched on the grid.
This gives us our 5 sec (or more) spool time. But how good would it have been to see all 20 cars (22 if counting Cadillac) mega blip the ICE with the now-500hp MGUK, late fuel, late spark, and throw a flame for a couple seconds right before the launch...

Is there a correlating specification for what ICE speed (& thus fuel qty) and/or MGUK regen power can be used during declutch/idle/standstill. A sidenote is that this would go some way to telling us how much heat these passive cooling systems can soak up at a standstill.

Vappy wrote:
22 Nov 2025, 00:43
If cold blowing is re-used in 2026, perhaps this video could give us an idea of what that might sound like?
Maybe. Solve for:
-Can the ICE deliver sufficient gas flow during engine braking to the turbine and at what RPM, to prevent lag
-With or without combustion heat?
-What if any limits are there to injection timing (RBPT interview suggested this exists)
-Would such open throttle engine braking anti-lag be less taxing upon the ES
-Is any of this bad for ICE reliability

Fit to:
-1 spark rule

wuzak
wuzak
514
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

vorticism wrote:
22 Nov 2025, 06:23
Was thinking there must be a clause like that.
vorticism wrote:
19 Nov 2025, 21:46
I guess the long spooling time means they can’t use the K to speed up the engine while it’s declutched on the grid.
This gives us our 5 sec (or more) spool time. But how good would it have been to see all 20 cars (22 if counting Cadillac) mega blip the ICE with the now-500hp MGUK, late fuel, late spark, and throw a flame for a couple seconds right before the launch...

Is there a correlating specification for what ICE speed (& thus fuel qty) and/or MGUK regen power can be used during declutch/idle/standstill. A sidenote is that this would go some way to telling us how much heat these passive cooling systems can soak up at a standstill.
I would imagine the part throttle fuel flow rules would determine the amount that could be recovered.

Also, the net power of the PU would be what the clutch can hold for preloading at the start.

The launch would, therefore, not be the increse in power from the ICE, at least not completely, but the reduction of recovery.

michl420
michl420
24
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 17:08
Location: Austria

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

As I understand this, this is a possible race start procedure?!:
1 red light: ice up to rpm (10500?)
2 red light: MGUK start regeneration with allowed power (200kw?, 350kw?), batterie must be not full
lights out: MGUK reduces regeneration like driver demand.
This would give full power very early, and a (mostly) electric controlled start (if it is desired).

This preload had also nothing to do with the driveshaft cluch, because ICE and MGUK are both located "before" it.

saviour stivala
saviour stivala
46
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

michl420 wrote:
22 Nov 2025, 08:46
As I understand this, this is a possible race start procedure?!:
1 red light: ice up to rpm (10500?)
2 red light: MGUK start regeneration with allowed power (200kw?, 350kw?), batterie must be not full
lights out: MGUK reduces regeneration like driver demand.
This would give full power very early, and a (mostly) electric controlled start (if it is desired).

This preload had also nothing to do with the driveshaft cluch, because ICE and MGUK are both located "before" it.
MGU-K regeneration is the process of recovering energy during braking. This process is not compatible with race start, which is about using energy not recovering it.

gruntguru
gruntguru
572
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 07:43

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
22 Nov 2025, 02:26
gruntguru wrote:
22 Nov 2025, 00:42
@Wuzak - under the rules is it possible they can run the engine in generator mode with the car stationary? What fuel flow would be available? They could certainly do this with radically retarded timing to generate hot exhaust gas.
It seems so. . . .
C5.2.19 When the car is stationary on the grid prior to a standing start the MGU-K torque may only be negative (i.e. charging the ES) except for torque requested by an MGU-K active damping strategy whose sole purpose is to protect the MGU-K Mechanical Transmission. . . .
It looks to be specifically allowed!
As to the fuel flow allowed during this pre-launch spool-up phase, do you think it will be just the 869 MJ/hr from 5.4.5 below?
5.4.5 At partial load, the fuel energy flow must not exceed the limit curve defined below:
• EF (MJ/h) = 380 when the engine power is equal to or below -50kW
• EF (MJ/h) = 9.78 x engine power (kW) + 869 when the engine power is above -50kW

That might be enough if combined with late spark timing.
je suis charlie

wuzak
wuzak
514
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

I would think more, as they don't sit waiting for the lights to go out with 0kW power.

They hold the clutch at thr bite point and load the engine against the brakes.

If that was 50kW, the fuel flow would be over 50% greater.

saviour stivala
saviour stivala
46
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

The regulations will not allow the engine to be run as a generator in stationary mode. Running the engine as a generator is a form of energy recovery, but it can only happen while the car is in motion, not when the car is stationary.

mzso
mzso
69
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

diffuser wrote:
13 Nov 2025, 21:30
Multiple tanks is not allowed. There isn't a limit in tank size in the new regs. Just a flow rate restriction. I think my math says 93L/hr ish. You can do the math for a 1.5hr race.
I wonder if it's viable to have different fuel tank sizes and variable packaging.

mzso
mzso
69
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

vorticism wrote:
20 Nov 2025, 18:28
What I was getting at was, if it was permitted to use the 500 hp MGUK to increase the crankshaft speed of the 500 hp ICE beyond what the ICE itself can provide, then this should help spool up the turbine more quickly. But as the video alluded to, it takes 5 seconds to spool--does this mean the K can’t be used during idle? There are limits, discussed earlier in this topic, about what the MGUK can do independent of pedal position. It's too bad they can't use two accelerator pedals! How much fun would that be. Fiddle-throttle has a nice ring to it.

As for relying on the MGUK & ES alone to compensate for lag, you’d be leaving performance on the table if there is a way to overcome it by another means.
Isn't that what it always does when they use it for power deployment? Add electric power and the ICE speeds up as well.

mzso
mzso
69
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

gruntguru wrote:
21 Nov 2025, 10:10
Fortunately the ICE can make near full power with nowhere-near full boost - the extra boost is needed to maximise TE and eke out the last handful of ponies.
This goes against my understanding of forced induction.

User avatar
diffuser
251
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

mzso wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 01:51
diffuser wrote:
13 Nov 2025, 21:30
Multiple tanks is not allowed. There isn't a limit in tank size in the new regs. Just a flow rate restriction. I think my math says 93L/hr ish. You can do the math for a 1.5hr race.
I wonder if it's viable to have different fuel tank sizes and variable packaging.
The positioning is VERY restrictive. What I remember reading... it just about sounded like "you got to put it here". The tank itself is a bladder so it grows and shrinks with the amount of fuel in it. It's tall and slender. Has multiple vertical compartments with fuel being able to go down a compartment but not back up. It's probably been behind the driver for the last 30 years, if not more.
Last edited by diffuser on 23 Nov 2025, 02:22, edited 1 time in total.

mzso
mzso
69
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

diffuser wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 02:19
mzso wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 01:51
diffuser wrote:
13 Nov 2025, 21:30
Multiple tanks is not allowed. There isn't a limit in tank size in the new regs. Just a flow rate restriction. I think my math says 93L/hr ish. You can do the math for a 1.5hr race.
I wonder if it's viable to have different fuel tank sizes and variable packaging.
The positioning is VERY restrictive. What I remember reading... it just about sounded like "you got to put it here". The tank itself is a bladder so it grows and shrinks with the amount of fuel in it. It's tall and slender. Has multiple compartments with fuel being able to go down a compartment but not back up. It's probably been behind the driver for the last 30 years, if not more.
I meant package stuff around it when you need a larger size and different aero cover.

User avatar
diffuser
251
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

mzso wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 02:22
diffuser wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 02:19
mzso wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 01:51


I wonder if it's viable to have different fuel tank sizes and variable packaging.
The positioning is VERY restrictive. What I remember reading... it just about sounded like "you got to put it here". The tank itself is a bladder so it grows and shrinks with the amount of fuel in it. It's tall and slender. Has multiple compartments with fuel being able to go down a compartment but not back up. It's probably been behind the driver for the last 30 years, if not more.
I meant package stuff around it when you need a larger size and different aero cover.
I think the space is made there as part of the frame, the ICE is part of the frame. It could only be changed at great cost.

Image

Image

wuzak
wuzak
514
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

saviour stivala wrote:
22 Nov 2025, 11:40
michl420 wrote:
22 Nov 2025, 08:46
As I understand this, this is a possible race start procedure?!:
1 red light: ice up to rpm (10500?)
2 red light: MGUK start regeneration with allowed power (200kw?, 350kw?), batterie must be not full
lights out: MGUK reduces regeneration like driver demand.
This would give full power very early, and a (mostly) electric controlled start (if it is desired).

This preload had also nothing to do with the driveshaft cluch, because ICE and MGUK are both located "before" it.
MGU-K regeneration is the process of recovering energy during braking. This process is not compatible with race start, which is about using energy not recovering it.
saviour stivala wrote:
22 Nov 2025, 18:07
The regulations will not allow the engine to be run as a generator in stationary mode. Running the engine as a generator is a form of energy recovery, but it can only happen while the car is in motion, not when the car is stationary.
Please explain the meaning of the following regulation:

C5.2.19 When the car is stationary on the grid prior to a standing start the MGU-K torque may only be negative (i.e. charging the ES) except for torque requested by an MGU-K active damping strategy whose sole purpose is to protect the MGU-K Mechanical Transmission.

wuzak
wuzak
514
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

diffuser wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 03:07
mzso wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 02:22
diffuser wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 02:19


The positioning is VERY restrictive. What I remember reading... it just about sounded like "you got to put it here". The tank itself is a bladder so it grows and shrinks with the amount of fuel in it. It's tall and slender. Has multiple compartments with fuel being able to go down a compartment but not back up. It's probably been behind the driver for the last 30 years, if not more.
I meant package stuff around it when you need a larger size and different aero cover.
I think the space is made there as part of the frame, the ICE is part of the frame. It could only be changed at great cost.

https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1 ... fiJXQ.jpeg

https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1 ... KFUU3g.png
The fuel cell must be within the Survival Cell.

The ICE connects to the rear of the Survival Cell.

For 2026, the MGUK can be mounted on the ICE or the Survival Cell.

The ES must be within the Survival Cell.