https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/what ... dsq-shock/The first thing that can be discounted is some wild rumours that emerged after the Brazilian Grand Prix that the FIA had discovered tricks being done by teams.
Stories suggested that this involved an unspecified number of competitors using expanding titanium skid blocks that would run lower to the ground to help protect the plank.
It sounded like a nice theory, but it was one that was scoffed at by both engineers in the pitlane and the FIA – because the tactic was the complete opposite of what is needed.
I did. Page 5.AR3-GP wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025, 04:20I'm surprised that no one shared this yet?
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/what ... dsq-shock/The first thing that can be discounted is some wild rumours that emerged after the Brazilian Grand Prix that the FIA had discovered tricks being done by teams.
Stories suggested that this involved an unspecified number of competitors using expanding titanium skid blocks that would run lower to the ground to help protect the plank.
It sounded like a nice theory, but it was one that was scoffed at by both engineers in the pitlane and the FIA – because the tactic was the complete opposite of what is needed.
/end
there are some from Canada. Not perfect, but you can get an idea
As "The Race" article pointed out, the skids themselves are measured after the race, therefore little value in wearing them preferentially before the plank.Vettel165 wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025, 13:04Apparently, several teams are said to be using so-called skid blocks that expand when heated and thus protect the floor.
The expanded skid block reduces wear on the floor, allowing teams to run the car lower without risking disqualification. The lower the car runs, the more downforce it has, and the better the lap times.
There doesn't appear to be any real evidence to back that up, no factual reference it seems. As already mentioned by others in this thread, it looks to be something of false / speculative report from that source.Vettel165 wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025, 13:04McLaren may have been one of the teams that used “skid blocks” to artificially protect the car’s floor.
According to the Japanese outlet as-web.jp, the FIA has been investigating since the Brazilian GP whether teams have been manipulating their floors. Apparently, several teams are said to be using so-called skid blocks that expand when heated and thus protect the floor.
The expanded skid block reduces wear on the floor, allowing teams to run the car lower without risking disqualification. The lower the car runs, the more downforce it has, and the better the lap times.
The FIA was alerted by rival teams in Brazil that some cars were running incredibly low ride heights, yet the expected abrasion on the floor was missing.
As a result, FIA technical chief Jo Bauer inspected several cars in Interlagos and discovered components that artificially heated the skid blocks. The FIA ordered these elements to be removed immediately before qualifying, which could also explain why some teams — including McLaren — showed significant performance differences between the Sprint and qualifying.
Without the skid blocks, teams cannot run as low, because the floor plank would wear down too much. But this is exactly what happened to McLaren in Las Vegas. This circumstance suggests that the papaya-colored cars may also have used such an aid earlier.
The big question will Mclaren perfomance drop now after Las Vegas because of this?
One of the talking heads, don't recall which one, said they were concerned they would not get a fuel sample after the radio calls so hot foot over to McLaren to get the result as soon as possible. No doubt they considered other things at the same time, but it sounds like being able to get 1ltr of fuel was the main reason for the hastesearch wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025, 15:16in Austrian TV, Wurz said that the McLaren cars were checked earlier after the race than usual, potentially going back to rumors he heard about other teams pushing the FIA to have a closer look.
I guess it could also have happened because of the long upcoming travel to Qatar, though. And the fact that the McLaren was illegal also in the later validation check speaks against heat playing much of a part as well.
Would a hotter skid not be thicker? So if anything, checking as early as possible should have helped McLaren.search wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025, 15:16in Austrian TV, Wurz said that the McLaren cars were checked earlier after the race than usual, potentially going back to rumors he heard about other teams pushing the FIA to have a closer look.
I guess it could also have happened because of the long upcoming travel to Qatar, though. And the fact that the McLaren was illegal also in the later validation check speaks against heat playing much of a part as well.