2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
saviour stivala
saviour stivala
46
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

diffuser wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 03:57
gruntguru wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 03:50
saviour stivala wrote:
22 Nov 2025, 18:07
IN MY HUMBLE OPINION the regulations will not allow the engine to be run as a generator in stationary mode. Running the engine as a generator is a form of energy recovery, but it can only happen while the car is in motion, not when the car is stationary.
Is this statement in reference to my post? I don't think anyone is really concerned with that ...The only time a F1 car is stationary is at the start of the race and in the pit box. Going in and out of the pits it will be charging the battery, if it isn't full. Well, unless there is some rule I haven't heard of that prevents it. It will charge the battery under Saftey car and VSC conditions. etc etc etc .
Yes, when the car is not stationary, and provided it is moving above 50km/h (2026), the MGU-K can either charge the ES by harvesting energy, by use of brake pedal, or deploy energy to crankshaft, by use of accelerator pedal.

wuzak
wuzak
515
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

gruntguru wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 04:02
mzso wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 02:14
gruntguru wrote:
21 Nov 2025, 10:10
Fortunately the ICE can make near full power with nowhere-near full boost - the extra boost is needed to maximise TE and eke out the last handful of ponies.
This goes against my understanding of forced induction.
A state-of-the-art 1.6 litre 6 cylinder racing engine with peak power at 10,500 rpm will have at least 200 KW. With 1 bar boost (2 Bar MAP) it will have 400+ KW. At this boost our F1 engine has reached its fuel flow limit so probably only makes 350 - 370 kW. The rules permit 4.8 Bar MAP but the extra boost is only used for leaning to increase TE. This TE increase gives our F1 engine the 400 - 440 KW we are expecting - not a lot more than it does at 2 Bar MAP.
I get an afr of ~8:1 at 10,500rpm with no boost, 100% volumetric efficiency.

What sort of afr would be required for stoichiometric? 12:1, 13:1?

So it wouldn't take much boost for them to be able to use the full fuel flow.

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
656
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 10:18
gruntguru wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 04:02
mzso wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 02:14
This goes against my understanding of forced induction.
A state-of-the-art 1.6 litre 6 cylinder racing engine with peak power at 10,500 rpm will have at least 200 KW. With 1 bar boost (2 Bar MAP) it will have 400+ KW. At this boost our F1 engine has reached its fuel flow limit so probably only makes 350 - 370 kW. The rules permit 4.8 Bar MAP but the extra boost is only used for leaning to increase TE. This TE increase gives our F1 engine the 400 - 440 KW we are expecting - not a lot more than it does at 2 Bar MAP.
I get an afr of ~8:1 at 10,500rpm with no boost, 100% volumetric efficiency.
What sort of afr would be required for stoichiometric? 12:1, 13:1?
So it wouldn't take much boost for them to be able to use the full fuel flow.
is the Miller cycle disadvantageous in this aspect ? ('response' with low or no boost)

Dr. Acula
Dr. Acula
46
Joined: 28 Jul 2018, 13:23

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 10:18
gruntguru wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 04:02
mzso wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 02:14
This goes against my understanding of forced induction.
A state-of-the-art 1.6 litre 6 cylinder racing engine with peak power at 10,500 rpm will have at least 200 KW. With 1 bar boost (2 Bar MAP) it will have 400+ KW. At this boost our F1 engine has reached its fuel flow limit so probably only makes 350 - 370 kW. The rules permit 4.8 Bar MAP but the extra boost is only used for leaning to increase TE. This TE increase gives our F1 engine the 400 - 440 KW we are expecting - not a lot more than it does at 2 Bar MAP.
I get an afr of ~8:1 at 10,500rpm with no boost, 100% volumetric efficiency.

What sort of afr would be required for stoichiometric? 12:1, 13:1?

So it wouldn't take much boost for them to be able to use the full fuel flow.
Stoichiometric with "normal" petrol would be 14.7:1. Possible that it's slightly different with the fuel that is used in F1.

wuzak
wuzak
515
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

Dr. Acula wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 17:19
wuzak wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 10:18
gruntguru wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 04:02

A state-of-the-art 1.6 litre 6 cylinder racing engine with peak power at 10,500 rpm will have at least 200 KW. With 1 bar boost (2 Bar MAP) it will have 400+ KW. At this boost our F1 engine has reached its fuel flow limit so probably only makes 350 - 370 kW. The rules permit 4.8 Bar MAP but the extra boost is only used for leaning to increase TE. This TE increase gives our F1 engine the 400 - 440 KW we are expecting - not a lot more than it does at 2 Bar MAP.
I get an afr of ~8:1 at 10,500rpm with no boost, 100% volumetric efficiency.

What sort of afr would be required for stoichiometric? 12:1, 13:1?

So it wouldn't take much boost for them to be able to use the full fuel flow.
Stoichiometric with "normal" petrol would be 14.7:1. Possible that it's slightly different with the fuel that is used in F1.
It's a synthetic/bio fuel that has lower energy density, so I would expect a different stoichiometric ratio.

gruntguru
gruntguru
572
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 07:43

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 10:18
gruntguru wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 04:02
mzso wrote:
23 Nov 2025, 02:14
This goes against my understanding of forced induction.
A state-of-the-art 1.6 litre 6 cylinder racing engine with peak power at 10,500 rpm will have at least 200 KW. With 1 bar boost (2 Bar MAP) it will have 400+ KW. At this boost our F1 engine has reached its fuel flow limit so probably only makes 350 - 370 kW. The rules permit 4.8 Bar MAP but the extra boost is only used for leaning to increase TE. This TE increase gives our F1 engine the 400 - 440 KW we are expecting - not a lot more than it does at 2 Bar MAP.
I get an afr of ~8:1 at 10,500rpm with no boost, 100% volumetric efficiency.
What sort of afr would be required for stoichiometric? 12:1, 13:1?
So it wouldn't take much boost for them to be able to use the full fuel flow.
Yes. Of course a state-of-the-art NA racing engine will have a VE of around 120% so your 8:1 becomes 9.6:1. Best power NA (varying fuel quantity) is at say 10.8:1 (assuming fuel has a stoich of 12) so they would be able to use about 90% of the max fuel allocation under these conditions. Somewhere around 0.1 Bar of boost (1.1 Bar MAP) they would need the full fuel allocation.
je suis charlie

mzso
mzso
69
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 01:13
Fuel energy density must be between 38.0 MJ/kg and 41.0 MJ/kg. That's about 8% difference, so teh weight difference will be significant.
Only if you believe anyone is going to use fuel of much inferior energy density. I don't.

wuzak
wuzak
515
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

mzso wrote:
25 Nov 2025, 02:19
wuzak wrote:
24 Nov 2025, 01:13
Fuel energy density must be between 38.0 MJ/kg and 41.0 MJ/kg. That's about 8% difference, so teh weight difference will be significant.
Only if you believe anyone is going to use fuel of much inferior energy density. I don't.
They won't if there are efficiency gains using a formula with lower energy density.

They will probably aim for the highest energy density possible, but that's not to say that all fuel suppliers will achieve it.

User avatar
BorisTheBlade
34
Joined: 21 Nov 2008, 11:15

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

Hi everyone,

a couple of days ago, I made a post in the F1 Car & Hardware Development > 2026 F1 Cars - General Thread regarding ERS-K recovery - especially under partial load.
I only discovered this very thread here afterwards, were a lot of this was already discussed to a certain degree. So after having read through this, I was able to answer some of my questions and to fix some of my previous errors.
But some things are still not clicking for me...

ERS-K recovery from ICE power under partial load
The chart below is a refinement of the one in the post linked above, showing the potential of what could be harvested under partial load.
Image
  • The dark green area is the theoretically harvestable power from the ICE - which is derived from C5.2.5 assuming a (IMHO still challenging) TE of 48 %.
  • The blue dots are the needed min. RPM (x1000) according to C5.2.4 - again assuming 48 % TE. This of course means, that you need the right gear for the desired speed in a certain corner.
  • The 50 kW base ICE output at/below -50 kW power demand might be intended to just keep the ICE from stalling - so there will not be much to harvest.
  • So between 0 kW and 300 kW power demand something between 100 kW and 170 kW could be harvestable - not nothing, but quite a bit less and on a narrower power demand band than I had initially thought.
Aside from having it gotten totally wrong, questions that I could not answer myself until now:
  • Is power demand only derived from the throttle pedal or also from the braking pedal?
  • If it is only the throttle pedal, is -50 kW the minimum value which stands for minimum Engine Braking? Or could it be possible to have the throttle pedal mapped from -350 kW to750 kW, making it a bit like "One Pedal Driving" in a BEV? Coincidently, there was a rule in an earlier revision of the Technical Regulations prohibiting certain points (like for example the 0 kW point on such a wide band) to be marked (felt by the driver). This rule seems to have vanished.
  • If both, how does it get aggregated? Adding both, ignoring the throttle pedal as soon as one hits the brake pedal, something else?
Full throttle ERS-K behaviour
The below chart basically shows the corridor of allowed full throttle behaviour as prescribed by the rules as I do understand it.
Image
  • The lower bound is defined by:
    C5.12.4
    Except for conforming to Article C5.2.8, the driver maximum power demand cannot be reduced by
    more than 150kW at the start of any full Throttle period and the power reduction will remain fixed
    for a minimum of 1s.
    Earlier, it said, that the ERS-K needed to provide at least 200 kW for the first second during full Throttle.
    5.12.6
    Unless the electrical DC power of the ERS-K is negative, the driver maximum power demand must
    not be reduced at any greater than the rates defined below:
    a. 50kW in any 1s period at Competitions where the FIA determines that the power limited
    distance exceeds 3500m. [...]
    b. 100kW in any 1s period at all other Competitions.
  • The upper bound is more a rough guesstimate for a scenario, where full throttle starts with 200 km/h leaving a corner, acceleration to 290 km/h in 2,5 seconds and reaching 345 km/h after 13,5 seconds.
    C5.2.8 defines the downslope of ERS-K output depending on speed.
So far, so good. I cannot imagine someone to use the lower bound under normal circumstances, as you would basically be a sitting duck with 150kW combined power against 750 kW of others.
But who or what controls the actual behaviour for a specific full throttle case? Will the drivers get presets between which to choose from straight to straight? Is it derived from the depletion rate beyond just preventing instant jumps from 350 kW to 0 kW? Or am I misunderstanding this and the lower bound does not define what might happing during full thottle, but what is allowed to happen when a driver lifts his right foot?

Could anyone shed some light on this?

gruntguru
gruntguru
572
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 07:43

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

BorisTheBlade wrote:
25 Nov 2025, 21:37
[*]Is power demand only derived from the throttle pedal or also from the braking pedal?
My guess is the teams can use either or both. Mode-switch settings will determine the relationship between pedal inputs and power/harvesting balance.
je suis charlie

gruntguru
gruntguru
572
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 07:43

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

There are lots of ambiguous or poorly worded sections in the rules. Here is another example:
"the driver maximum power demand must not be reduced at any greater than the rates defined below"
Pretty sure the intent of this wording is "during driver maximum demand, the PU output must not be reduced at any greater than the rates defined below"
je suis charlie

vorticism
vorticism
367
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

Issue 14 adds "Any intentional heating or cooling of the Fuel Flow Meter is forbidden."

gruntguru
gruntguru
572
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 07:43

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

BorisTheBlade wrote:
25 Nov 2025, 21:37
ERS-K recovery from ICE power under partial load
The chart below . . . . . . .
BTW - thanks for posting this - and all the work you have put into it. The graphical representation makes the whole thing easier to understand.
je suis charlie

saviour stivala
saviour stivala
46
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

gruntguru wrote:
25 Nov 2025, 23:17
BorisTheBlade wrote:
25 Nov 2025, 21:37
[*]Is power demand only derived from the throttle pedal or also from the braking pedal?
My guess is the teams can use either or both. Mode-switch settings will determine the relationship between pedal inputs and power/harvesting balance.
Power demand is met by both the throttle pedal and the brake pedal. With the later playing a significantly larger role in energy recovery for 2026 season.While the throttle pedal controls power demand from the engine, the brake pedal is the primary input for the energy harvesting system, which converts kinetic energy into electrical power to be stored in the battery for later use.

michl420
michl420
24
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 17:08
Location: Austria

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

BorisTheBlade wrote:
25 Nov 2025, 21:37
ERS-K recovery from ICE power under partial load
The chart below . . . . . . .
Very informativ post, thank you.
It shows also how the gear selection influence harvesting.

The full trottle deployment will imho selected from the software based from a preset profile and the ES state.