Badger wrote: ↑24 Nov 2025, 22:00
AR3-GP wrote: ↑24 Nov 2025, 21:26
ME4ME wrote: ↑24 Nov 2025, 20:22
Also they better run that Honda PU hard. Nothing to lose really.
Speaking of, do we know what PU Verstappen used in Las Vegas? What was surprising to me is that they were actually quite slow on the straights in qualifying and the race. They were no quicker than Mclaren and well behind Mercedes. I thought this was strange because you would expect to see an advantage here with a fresh PU.
I mention this because in 2021, Mercedes actually ran the PU of Bottas too hard, bricked it, and had to replace it again...So it's possible that they damaged the Brazil PU (note this is heavy speculation)
Max was significantly down on SL speed in Vegas vs Merc and McLaren, in the range of 5 kph. I'd argue 3 main reasons. Firstly he was running slightly more drag, secondly there is no "spicy PU" (just a fresh PU running the normal settings, the power gain is quite marginal), and lastly the Merc PU excels in the cold temperatures of Vegas. They've had insane SL speed every year there, it just seems to bring out a few extra HP relative to the competition for them.
Tsunoda with the same rear wing minus a gurney flap, and likely a bit less front wing, was pretty much in line with the Merc.
More cold air => more dense, more oxygen through the intake plenum for given velocity of air ; but the ICE can't produce more power just from more oxygen alone, because fuelling is limited anyway; otherwise the design of ICE is suboptimal for 'regular' air temperatures like 25-35C. Maybe the colder air increases the thermal efficiency of intercoolers, turbos, MGU-H etc, but the teams reduce the 'cooling intake' to squeeze out every ounce of drag advantage (ie they will calculate the ducting area for engine cover/brakes etc very precisely and wont open them up even 1sq.cm more than necessary).
Nevertheless, here is a comparison pic of wing levels from raceday :
Purely from eyeballing :
FW : SF25 < RB21 < W16 < McL39
RW : SF25 < McL39 < RB21 < W16
- The Mercedes RW, even though it has more 'spoon' and more 'apparent frontal area', is built in a 'stacked' manner, like the front wings, with large slot gap (compared to others) between the mainplane and flap - I don't have enough aero knowledge to infer whether this reduces drag
(making the downforce vector closer to vertical, compared to the others whose vector might be leaning more rearwards) and results in less top speed penalty for the given downforce level.
OR
- Maybe such 'low-base-downforce' levels make the bodywork (engine cover, sidepod, severity of the floor edge vortices) have a bigger share of the total drag, and the difference in these things across the cars are playing a role in determining top speed.
OR
- Maybe the floor itself has vast differences across teams, and the way the air exits the diffuser, which then gets energized by the beam wing(s) and then interacts with the rear wing , has enough differences across teams, to have differently shaped overall downforce v overall drag profiles such that when all teams slap on the biggest wings, one team has lowest drag and when all teams slap on the smallest wings, another team has the lowest drag.
Suffice to say that it's very difficult to discern which car will have highest top speed just by eyeballing, when visible differences in wing levels are so subtle. If we bring DRS-ON into the query, then it gets more complex.